Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC688IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.. OF2024(Arising out of SLP (C) No.24805 of 2023) RASHMI KANT VIJAY CHANDRA & ORS. APPELLANT(S) Versus BAIJNATH CHOUBEY & COMPANY RESPONDENT(S) ORDER Leave Granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 24th August, 2023 passed in S.A.No.100 of 2021 by the High Court of Calcutta, whereby the judgment and order dated 12th December, 2019 passed by the City Civil Court at Calcutta1 in Title Appeal No.14/2018 was set aside. The First Appellate Court set aside the findings returned by the Presidency Small 1 Hereinafter referred as First Appellate Court 1 | SLP (C) No . 2 4805/2023 Cause Court2 in favour of the respondent-tenant, at Calcutta in Ejectment Suit No.1079 of 2002 by order dated 27th November, 2017.3. The issue inter se the parties, is one between a landlord and tenant. The facts stretch about 90 years in time beginning on 19th February, 1933, when one Harak...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC682IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 258-259 OF2021PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SUS ROAD BANER VIKAS MANCH AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 265-266 OF2021JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. These Civil Appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 27th October 2020 passed by the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi1 in Original Application2 No.210 of 20203 wherein the Tribunal disposed of the OA preferred by the Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch, 1 Hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal. 2 Hereinafter referred to as OA3Earlier OA No.34 of 2019 (WZ). Initially the OA was preferred before the Tribunal, Western Zone, and was subsequently transferred to the Principal Bench, New Delhi. 1 Respondent No.1 herein, by directing the Pune Municipal Corporation4 to close the Garbage Processing Plant5 operated by Noble Exchange Environment Solution Pune LLP6, at Baner, Pune and to shift the same to an alte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC684Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3747 OF2024Ravinder Kumar Appellant versus State of Haryana ... Respondent JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 The appellant claims that he has been practising as a general Physician since 2001 and as a Radiologist since 2007. On 27th April 2017, a team comprising four officers raided the appellant's clinic. Based on the complaint against one woman, Dhanpati (accused no.1), that she is running a racket of sex determination and medical termination of pregnancy, a decoy patient was selected. The allegation is that Dhanpati was contracted to do the medical termination of the pregnancy of the decoy patient. The decoy patient and shadow witness, S.I. Usha Rani, informed Dhanpati that they knew the sex of the foetus. Dhanpati called the decoy patient on 27th April 2017 at Criminal Appeal No.3747 of 2024 Page 1 of 14 8 am for MTP. The shadow witness informed Dhanpati that family memb...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC683REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3083 OF2024JASEELA SHAJI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. The appellant, who is the wife of one Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji (Shaji A.K.)1, has approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 4th March 2024 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.1271 of 20232, vide which it has dismissed the said habeas corpus petition filed by 1 Hereinafter referred to as detenu. 2 habeas corpus petition 1 the appellant for production of the detenu, who was detained pursuant to the order of detention dated 31st August 20233 passed under the provisions of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 19744.2. By order dated 31st of July 2024, this Court allowed the present appeal; quashed and set aside the impugned judgment and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC686IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.23320 of 2023) ROHAN BUILDERS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... APPELLANT VERSUS BERGER PAINTS INDIA LIMITED ..... RESPONDENT W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.24489 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.26938 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 26990-26991 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.27353 of 2023) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.1344 of 2024) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.2115 of 2024) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8131 of 2024) CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.12170 of 2024) A N D CIVIL APP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC680IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3190 OF2014BEENA AND ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CHARAN DAS (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. What was once a dispute between landlord and tenant for the eviction of the tenant from the premises in dispute ended into a consent order way back in the year 1979. Unfortunately, the said consent order gave rise to a bitter civil dispute between the parties, which has now landed in this Court after the suit was dismissed by the court of first instance which judgment and order was upheld by the First Appellate Court. However, the decree so passed was reversed by the High Court in Second Appeal. This is how the parties are now before this Court.2. Late Bhawani Parshad alias Bhagati Parshad (now represented by his legal representatives) was the landlord 1 and late Charan Dass (now represented by his legal representatives) was a tenant in the premises consisting of a hou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC678NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9731-9732 OF2024LAKSHMESH M. APPELLANT VERSUS P. RAJALAKSHMI (DEAD BY LRS.) AND ORS. ETC.ETC. AND ORS. ... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.1. These two Appeals have been preferred against the final judgment and order dated 05.12.2014 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in RFA Nos. 902 of 2008 and 887 of 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned judgment). While disposing of these Regular First Appeals against the judgment and order dated 31.03.2008 passed by XII Addl. City Civil and Sessions (CCH No.27) Judge at Bengaluru in O.S No.5634 of 1980, by the common impugned order, the High Court while upholding the Trial Court judgment decreeing the suit and holding that the Civil Appeal Nos. 9731-9732 of 2024 Page 1 of 13 Appellant/Plaintiff is the lawful owner of the suit property, has further held that site allotted to Defendant No.20 (Respondent No.27 in Civ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC675REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(@ SLP (C) No.13835 of 2022) MANILAL Appellant (s) Versus THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeal calls in question the correctness of the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur dated 27.04.2022 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.997 of 2019. By the said judgment, the Division Bench dismissed the appeal of the appellant and 1 confirmed the order dated 27.11.2018 of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the appellant.3. We have heard Mr. Nishant Bishnoi, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Milind Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent-State and perused the records of the case. We have also considered the written submissions filed by the parties.4. The facts lie in a very narrow compass. The respondent- authorities under the provisions of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC676IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4177 OF2024SK. GOLAM LALCHAND APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NANDU LAL SHAW @ NAND LAL KESHRI @ NANDU LAL BAYES & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. Heard Shri Rauf Rahim, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Shri Pijush K. Roy, learned senior counsel for the respondent No.1.2. The dispute in this Civil Appeal is about the property measuring more or less 6 Cottahs 1 Chittack and 30 sq. ft. along with 17 rooms (about 4395 sq. ft. which comprises of tile sheds/huts) situate at 100/3 Carry Road, Howrah. 13. The plaintiff-respondent Nandu Lal claims that he had acquired rights in the aforesaid property through his father late Salik Ram along with his other brothers and that Brij Mohan, his cousin, the son of his uncle late Sita Ram, had no exclusive right to sell the property in favour of anyone much less to one of the tenants S.K. Golam Lalchand, the defendant-appellant.4. The Tit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC681IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 2764 OF2024(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.3419 OF2024 RAGHUVEER SHARAN ... APPELLANT VERSUS DISTRICT SAHAKARI KRISHI GRAMIN VIKAS BANK & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (C) No.508 OF2024IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 2764 OF2024@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.3419 OF2024 JUDGMENT PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 2764 OF20241. The appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 09.11.2023 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Criminal Revision No.1925 of 2023 whereby the High Court has dismissed the appellants revision application affirming the order passed by the Special Court MP/MLA) Gwalior on 17.04.2023 in exercise of power under 2 Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731 to summon the appellant as an accused.2. The facts of the case, briefly stated, are that in the year 1998, one Rajendra Bharti ...
Tag this Judgment!