Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1954 OF2012HAALESH @ HALESHI @ KURUBARA HALESHI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1955 OF2012and CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1303 OF2014JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. Learned counsel for the parties were heard.2. In Sessions Case No.25 of 2000 out of the nine accused, seven accused persons (A-1 to A-7) were convicted for various offences and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for different Page 1 of 14 period with a maximum of life imprisonment for an offence under Section 302 in aid with Section 149 IPC and remaining two accused persons i.e. (A-8 and A-9) were acquitted.3. Accused Nos. 1, 2 and 3 accepted the judgment of the Trial Court and did not file any appeal against it. Accused Nos. 4, 5 and 6 together filed a Criminal Appeal No.219 of 2007 before the High Court whereas accused No.7 filed a separate Criminal Appeal No.229 of 2007. The High Court by ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2024INSC167CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.666/2012 DATTATRAYA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT(S) ORDER This appeal arises out of the final judgment and order dated 23.11.2010 passed by the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No.06/2009 whereby the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 316 of the Indian Penal Code (for short IPC) was upheld and the appellant was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 and 10 years of R.I. under Section 316 of IPC, and was directed to pay fine amount of Rs.5000 and Rs.2000/-, respectively.2. The facts of this case are that the appellant (32 years of age in the year 2007), was married to one, Meenabai Dattatraya Gawali, (who was 30 years of age on the date of the incident). The wife Meenabai (deceased) was having a pregnancy of nine months at that time. It is the case of the prosecution that the appellant came home at ab...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 2024 INSC97REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.753/2023 SUSHIL KUMAR PANDEY & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.921/2023 JUDGMENT In these two writ petitions, we are to address the legality of the selection process of District Judge Cadre in the State of Jharkhand initiated in the year 2022. An advertisement bearing No.01/2022 was published on 24th March, 2022, inviting applications from the eligible candidates for the said posts. The vacancies specified in the advertisement itself were twenty-two. Appointment procedure to the said posts is guided by the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2001 (the 2001 Rules). In the year 2017, the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Regulation, 2017 (the 2017 Regulation) was framed in terms of Rule 11 and Rule...
Tag this Judgment!