Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2565 OF2022Commissioner of Income ...Appellant(s) Tax 8 Mumbai Versus Glowshine Builders & Respondent(s) Developers Pvt. Ltd. JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 04.09.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Income Tax Appeal No.1756 of 2014, by which, the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by Page 1 of 44 the Revenue, thereby confirming the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, G Bench, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the ITAT) by which the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) of Rs. 15,94,06,500/ was deleted, the Revenue has preferred the present appeal.2. The dispute pertains to the Assessment Year (AY) 200910 i.e., Financial Year (FY) 2008 09. The assessee entered into an agreement dated 06.05.2008 with one M/s Kirit City Homes Pvt. Ltd. The development rights in a property at...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.530 OF2022Dinesh Kumar .Appellant VERSUS The State of Haryana .Respondent JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.1. The appellant, and one Mange Ram, were convicted in Sessions Trial No.47 of 2000, for offences under Sections 302/364/392/394/201 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (IPC), by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jagadhri, Haryana. They were awarded life sentence under Section 302 IPC, and lesser sentence on the remaining convictions, vide order dated 11.07.2003. The two then filed separate appeals before Punjab and Haryana High Court. During the pendency of his appeal the coaccused Mange Ram passed away on 24.10.2004, and his appeal stood abated vide order dated 11.05.2017. The appeal of the present appellant was dismissed and the conviction and sentence of the trial court was upheld by the High Court, vide its order dated 31.05.2017. His SLP before this Court was given leave on 28....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
ITEM NO.1502 COURT NO.2 SECTION II-B (FOR JUDGMENT) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 10051/2022 ATULBHAI VITHALBHAI BHANDERI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT Respondent(s) ([HEARD BY: HON. AJAY RASTOGI AND HON. AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ.]. IA No.160204/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No.160205/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH SLP(Crl) No.331/2023 (II-B) (IA No.4409/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No.4411/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date :04. 05-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Sunil Murarka, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Gunnam Venkantewara Rao, Adv. Ms. S. Lakshmi Iyer, Adv. Ms. Anwesha Padhi, Adv. Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. Mrs. Taruna Singh Gohil, AOR Ms. Ranu Purohit, Adv. Mr. Alapati Sahithya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Mittal, Ad...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2338-2339 OF2010HEINZ INDIA LIMITED ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERELA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6633 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6635 OF2012JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The issue which this court has to deal with had placed the courts in a prickly pickle, on several occasions- whether medicated talcum powder is medicine or drug, or a cosmetic, or in terms of the statutes in question, medicated talcum powder?. The present appeals, by special leave, concern two sets of appeals: one, from the State of Kerala and the other from the State of 2 Tamil Nadu. The Kerala High Court, by its judgment1 rejected the revisions filed by the appellant/assessee (hereafter Heinz) aggrieved by the Kerela Sales Tax Appellate Tribunals orders holding that its product Nycil Prickly Heat Powder was classifiable not under Entry 79 of the First Schedule to Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (her...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO . OF2023(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.28241 OF2019 KANIMOZHI KARUNANIDHI .....APPELLANT VERSUS A. SANTHANA KUMAR & ORS. .....RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO . OF2023(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.28242 OF2019 KANIMOZHI KARUNANIDHI .....APPELLANT VERSUS A. SANTHANA KUMAR & ORS. .....RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant in both the appeals (hereinafter referred to as the returned candidate) has challenged the legality of the impugned common order dated 19.11.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Original Application Nos. 929/2019 and 1 930/2019 filed by the appellant in Election Petition No.3/2019, whereby the High Court has dismissed both the said applications. Factual matrix:3. The factual matrix giving rise to the present appeals are that on 19.03.2019, the nominations were invited pursuant to the notification issued by the Chief Election ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.930 of 2023 (@ Special Leave Petition (C) No.10747 of 2016) Damodhar Narayan Sawale (D) through LRs. Appellant (s) Versus Shri Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske & Ors. Respondent (s) JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. This appeal filed under Article 136 of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment and final order dated 30.10.2015 in Second Appeal No.435 of 1995 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, whereby and whereunder the High Court reversed the judgment and decree of the Court of Additional District Judge, Buldana, in Regular Civil Appeal No.98 of 1987, reversing the judgment and Page 1 of 40 Civil Appeal No.930 of 2023 decree of dismissal passed by the Court of Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chikhli in Regular Civil Suit No.257 of 1985 (originally numbered as Regular Civil Suit No.104 of 1979 on the file of the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Buldana, before ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8486 OF2011M/S TRIMURTHI FRAGRANCES (P) LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL APPELLANT(S) Versus GOVT.OF N.C.T OF DELHI THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (FINANCE) & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8485 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8487 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8488 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8491-8494 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8495 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8496-8501 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8502 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8617 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10374-10379 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 289 OF20232 JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. This judgment will dispose of appeals arising from judgments of three High Courts, on the question of taxability of pan masala or gutka/gutkha1, under state enactments. The appellants unsuccessfully argued that state legislatures were not empowered to levy sales tax on those articles, in view of the provision in the Constitution enabling the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1581 OF2021Kailash Vijayvargiya Appellant Versus Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri and others Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1582 OF2021CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1583 OF2021JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 01.10.2021 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in Criminal Revision Application No.92/2021, by which the High Court has allowed the said revision application preferred by respondent no.1 herein original complainant (victim) and Crl.A. No.1581/2021 Etc. Page 1 of 63 has quashed and set aside order dated 12.11.2020 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore (for short, learned CJM) rejecting the petition filed by respondent no.1 herein original complainant under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (Code/Cr.PC) original respondent nos. 2 to 4 (alleged accused) have preferred the present appeals.2. The facts ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1380 OF2023(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.11673/2019) KUNTI AND ANR. .APPELLANTS V. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL, J.Leave Granted.1. The present appeal arising out of special leave petition is directed against the judgement and order dated 18.10.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as the High Court) in Application u/s 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908, (hereafter CrPC) No.32337 of 2013, filed by the Appellants praying for quashing the order dated 22.11.2012 passed by the Chief Judicial 2 Magistrate, Bulandshahr, in Case No.6695 of 2012 arising out of Case Crime No.421 of 2012 under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 417 and 418 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. By the said judgement, the Honble High Court dismissed the Application filed by the Appellant(s) and held that no grounds to interfere are found....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1682-1683 OF2022M.K. RAJAGOPALAN ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. PERIASAMY PALANI GOUNDER . RESPONDENT(S) & ANR. WITH C.A. No.1756/2022 C.A. No.1759/2022 C.A. No.1757/2022 C.A. No.1807/2022 C.A. No.1810/2022 C.A. No.1827/2022 JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Preliminary and brief outline .............................................................................. 2 Particulars of the proceedings and the parties .................................................. 7 The relevant factual and background aspects ................................................ 13 Initiation of CIRP ................................................................................................... 14 CoC Meetings and ancillary proceedings .............................................................. 16 Resolution plan approved by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) .................... 26 Disapproval of the Appellate Tribunal (N...
Tag this Judgment!