Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Miscellaneous Application No.of 2023 @ Dy. No.16203 of 2023 With Interlocutory Application No.79306, 79307 & 79308 of 2023 in Criminal Appeal No.463 of 2022 Vijay Kumar Ghai & Ors. ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS State of West Bengal & Ors. ... RESPONDENT(S) ------------ Amit Jalan APPLICANT JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J.The present Miscellaneous Application has been moved by the applicant- Amit Jalan along with the application seeking permission to file intervention. 12. We have heard learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant who is not a party to the proceedings in Criminal Appeal No.463 of 2022, which was decided by this Court vide order dated 22.03.2022, is seeking clarification of the said order solely on the ground that the same may have a bearing on the case of the applicant.3. From a perusal of pleadings, we find that three criminal prosecutions were launched by the Revenue Department under Sections 132 a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.60 OF2023RITU CHHABARIA PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J.1. The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the writ petitioner herein seeking the release of her husband on default bail. The writ petition also raises an issue of grave importance of personal liberty enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. 1 FACTS2 Briefly, the facts relevant to the present writ petition are that an FIR was lodged under Section 120(B) read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC) along with Sections 7,12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, wherein the writ petitioners husband was not named.3. Subsequently, two supplementary chargesheets were filed, wherein the writ petitioners husband (hereinafter referred to as accused) was made...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Miscellaneous Application No.531 of 2023 With Interlocutory Application No.69324, 69326 & 69341 of 2023 in Criminal Appeal No.249 of 2020 Mukul Agarwal & Ors APPELLANT(S) VERSUS State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. ... RESPONDENT(S) ---------------- Mukesh Maganlal Doshi APPLICANT JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J.This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by the applicant- Mukesh Maganlal Doshi, seeking clarification of the order dated 10.02.2020 passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.249 of 2020. The said Miscellaneous Application is accompanied by an application 1 seeking permission to file intervention for clarification and an application for intervention.2. It is pertinent to point out at this stage itself that applicant was not a party in Criminal Appeal No.249 of 2020, which was decided by order dated 10.02.2020, the clarification whereof is being sought by the applicant.3. The facts as culled out in the app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3134-3135 OF2023[@ SLP (CIVIL) NO(S).8708-8709/2019 ]. THE SUB REGISTRAR, AMUDALAVALASA & ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S DANKUNI STEELS LTD. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. By order dated 13.06.2002, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh ordered M/s. Midwest Iron & Steel company Ltd. (which is Respondent No.3 in the appeals) to be wound up. Though pursuant to order dated 22.09.2003, efforts were made to sell the property of respondent no.3 in three lots, finally, based on an auction for a consolidated sale, the 1 second respondent herein, namely, M/s. SMC Marketing Private Ltd. who figured as the highest bidder, became the successful auction purchaser. It bid for the property which consisted of land, building, civil works, plant & machinery and current assets, etc. The amount for which the second respondent was declared the highest bidder was Rs.8.35 crore...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2012 OF2013SHRI RAKESH RAMAN APPELLANT Versus SMT. KAVITA RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.1. This appeal arises out of a divorce proceeding initiated by the appellant under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), in the Court of Additional District Judge (North), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. His suit was decreed and the marriage was dissolved by the Order of the Additional District Judge (North) dated 02.05.2009. The respondent/wife, then, filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court which has set aside the order of the Trial Court and Page 1 of 17 dismissed the petition of the husband. Aggrieved by the said Order, the appellant/husband has filed a Special Leave Petition before this Court, in which leave was granted on 26.02.2013.2. The appellant and the respondent were married under Hindu rituals and customs in Delhi, on 16.04.1994. Regrettably, it did n...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.451 OF2011Bothilal Appellant versus The Intelligence Officer Narcotics Control Bureau ...Respondent with CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1185 OF2011JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 Criminal Appeal No.451 of 2011 has been preferred by accused no.3 and Criminal Appeal No.1185 of 2011 has been preferred by accused no.1. As per the case of the prosecution, PW2 Nalini Ranjan, Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Criminal Appeal No.451 of 2011 Page 1 of 16 Bureau (for short, NCB), South Zonal Unit, Chennai received information on 16th May 2002. Based on the information, she along with her team and two independent witnesses namely Devendran and Prabhu conducted a raid at Room No.303, Hotel Suriya, Periamet, Chennai where accused no.4 F. Anna Raj was staying. The officers of NCB found that apart from accused no.4, accused nos.1 to 3 were also present in the room. The door of the room was opened by ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8553-8557 OF2014STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ETC. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DR. P. A. BHATT & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.701 OF2017IN C.A. NO.8556 OF2014@ C.A. NOS .8553-8557 OF2014CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.674 OF2017IN C.A. NO.8555 OF2014@ CA NOS. 8553-8557 OF2014CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.916 OF2017IN C.A. NO.8557 OF2014@ CA NOS.8553-8557 OF2014JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. These civil appeals arise out of a common order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad confirming the order of the learned Single Judge, holding that the 1 respondents possessing a degree of BAMS (Bachelor of Ayurved in Medicine and Surgery) should be treated at par with the doctors holding MBBS degrees and that they are entitled to the benefits of the recommendations of the Tikku Pay Commission.2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.3. On the basis of a M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 Non-reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. OF2023[Arising out of SLP(C)NOs.8219-8226 of 2019]. AMRESH KUMAR SINHA & ORS.ETC.ETC. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2023[Arising out of SLP(C)NO.9666 of 2019]. WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs. OF2023[Arising out of SLP(C)NOs.11772-11773 of 2019]. JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard Shri Navniti Prasad Singh, learned Senior Advocate leading the arguments on behalf of the 2 appellants, Mr. Saket Singh and Mr.Samir Ali Khan, learned counsel appearing for the State of Bihar.3. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants as against the common judgment and order dated 05.02.2019 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna whereby the Letter Patent Appeals (LPAs) of the respondents have been allowed and the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 28.11.2017 allowing the writ petitions has been set...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8388 OF2017Shanti Bhushan (D) thr. Lr. & Ors. Appellants v. State of U.P. & Ors. ...Respondents JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 The dispute involved in this appeal is about the determination of the market value of a property at Allahabad purchased by the appellants under a registered sale deed dated 29th November 2010 (the sale deed) from Hari Mohan Das Tandon (the vendor). The property has been described in the Schedule to the sale deed which reads thus: SCHEDULE OF THE PROPERTY Civil Appeal No.8388 of 2017 Page 1 of 26 Part Portion of Free Hold Site No.49 Civil Station, Allahabad of which Nagar Nigam No.is 19 Old, 77/29 New, and 19A Old 79/31 New, Lal Bahadur Shastri Marg (Elgin Road), Allahabad measuring 7818.00 sq.mts. land alongwith construction and super structure standing thereon shown in Red Colour in the annexed map and bounded as under: BOUNDARIES East : Part Portion of Freehold Si...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3802-3803 OF2020M/S. N.N. GLOBAL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LIMITED APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. INDO UNIQUE FLAME LTD. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.Index A. THE REFERENCE ............................................................................................................................... 2 B. A BIRDS OVERVIEW OF THE FACTS IN N.N. GLOBAL ...................................................................... 3 C. THE FINDINGS IN N.N. GLOBAL IN REGARD TO THE QUESTION UNDER THE CAPTION VALIDITY OF AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN AN UNSTAMPED AGREEMENT................................................... 5 D. SUBMISSION OF THE PARTIES ....................................................................................................... 15 E. ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 29 F. ...
Tag this Judgment!