Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6944 OF2015STATE OF ORISSA & ANR. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ORISSA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD KARMACHARI SANGH & ANR. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.12.2012 in Writ Appeal No.268 of 2011 whereby, the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa has dismissed the intra-court appeal filed by the appellant State of Orissa and has affirmed the order dated 25.10.2010 in W.P. (C) No.8438 of 2010, as passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court, holding the employees of the Orissa Khadi and Village Industries Board 1 entitled to pension at par with the Government 1 Hereinafter also referred to as the Board. 1 employees and also directing the State Government to amend the applicable regulations accordingly.2. In this appeal, the appellant State of Orissa has essentially contended that the High Court was not justified in ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8836/2022 PRAKASH KUMAR JENA & ORS. ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF ODISHA & ORS. .. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No.8837 / 2022 WITH C.A. No.8838 / 2022 JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in W.A. No.319 of 2020, the original writ petitioners working as Home Guards and the State of Orissa both have preferred the present appeals. :1. :2. Civil Appeal arising out of SLP No.3906 of 2022 has been filed by the State of Orissa and others challenging the order passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in W.P. (C) No.19556 of 2020 by which the High Court has disposed of the said writ petition in terms of the judgment and order passed in W.A. No.319 of 2020 which is the subject matter of C.A.No.8836 of 2022. Therefore, C.A. No.8836 of 2022 arising out of the impugned judgment and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.82 OF2022BHASIN INFOTECH AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD. .PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.1. In this transferred case, registered on withdrawal of a writ petition filed by the petitioner in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Writ Petition No.3790 of 2022) to this Court, the petitioner-company has challenged the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No.1 in not accepting its proposal to convert the subject land from leasehold to freehold as per the policy formulated on 06.11.2013 and amended on 03.05.2016.2. In the writ petition so filed in the High Court and transferred to this Court, the petitioner has sought the reliefs in the following terms: - a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 24.01.2022 passed by Respondent No.1 (Annexure-11) to the writ petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOSOF2023(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NOS. 2849-2854 OF2022 CARDINAL MAR GEORGE ALENCHERRY ...APPELLANT Versus STATE OF KERALA & ANR. RESPONDENTS WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NOS. 1487-1493 OF2022EPARCHY OF BATHERY, REP. THROUGH MOST REV. DR. JOSEPH MAR THOMAS ... PETITIONER Versus STATE Of KERALA & ORS. ETC. ... RESPONDENTS WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO(S). OF2023ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.7364 OF2022 CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF THAMARASSERY PETITIONER REP. THROUGH MAR REMEGIOSE INCHANAYIL Versus STATE OF KERALA & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) 1 JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. Leave granted in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2849-2854 of 2022.2. All these matters are arising out of the impugned common judgment and order dated 12.08.2021 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Crl. MC No.8936 of 2019, Crl. MC No.205 of 2020, Crl. MC No.1414 of 2020, Crl. MC No.1409 of 2020, Crl. MC No.2138 of 2020, Cr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEALS No.822-823 OF2023ARISING OUT OF PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) No.11104-11105 OF2022MS. X .. APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT Hima Kohli, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant/prosecutrix, who claims to have been exposed to the horrors of the notorious casting couch syndrome, at the hands of the respondent No.2/accused herein, is aggrieved by the orders dated 21st September, 20221 and 07th October, 20222, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in exercise of its Criminal Appellate jurisdiction allowing the anticipatory bail application3 filed by the respondent No.2/accused in connection with FIR4 filed by her with the MIDC Police Station, Mumbai. Initially, the FIR was registered under Sections 354, 354-B and 506 of the 1 First Impugned Order 2 Second Impugned Order 3 Anticipatory Bail Application No.2594 of 2022 4 CR FIR No.915 of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
// 1 // REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8460 / 2022 (@SLP (C) No.32002 OF2018 Indian Railway Appellant(s) Construction Company Limited Versus M/s National Buildings Respondent(s) Construction Corporation Limited JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 14.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in FAO(OS) No.112 of 2018 by which the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal, the Indian Railway Construction // 2 // Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as IRCON) has preferred the present appeal.2. The brief facts leading to filing of the present appeal in nutshell are as under:2. 1 That, an Agreement was entered into between IRCON and the respondent M/s. National Buildings Construction Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as NBCC), whereby the respondent was awarded the work of construction of Railway Station cum Commercial Complex at Vashi,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
// 1 // REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS . /2023 (@SLP (C) NOS.3475253 OF2016 STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JAYANTIBHAI ISHWARBHAI PATEL .. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 31.08.2015 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Special Civil Application No.9740/2012 by which the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat has allowed the said writ petition and has declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have // 2 // lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 2013) as also the judgment and order dated 01.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Gujarat in Misc. Civil Application (For Review) No.3036 of 2015 in Special Civil Application No.9740/2012, the State of G...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 5758 of 2012 M/s. Creative Garments Ltd. Appellant Versus Kashiram Verma Respondent JUDGMENT Rajesh Bindal, J.1. The Management has filed the present appeal challenging the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 10.06.2010 vide which the order passed by the Single Bench dated 06.07.2006 was upheld. As a consequence, the award of the Labour Court was held to be valid. The Labour Court vide its award dated 28.10.2005 had directed 1 reinstatement of the respondent with continuity of service from 08.12.1997 with full back wages.2. A perusal of the paper-book shows that the notice in the Petition for Special Leave to Appeal was issued on 22.10.2010. As the respondent remained unserved, fresh notice was directed to be issued on 13.12.2010. Dasti service was also permitted through nearest civil court or trial court. On 24.10.2011, this Court being not satisfied tha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
[Non-Reportable]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.738 OF2023(@ SLP(CRL.) NO.9665 OF2017 MEENU PRAKASH BHANTU Appellant Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondents JUDGMENT Rajesh Bindal, J.1. The Order dated 12th October, 2017 passed by the High Court for Judicature at Allahabad is under challenge before this Court. Vide the aforesaid order, the Criminal Miscellaneous Application filed by the appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short CrPC) for quashing of the orders dated 4th July, 2017 passed by the Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Criminal Revision No.306 of 2017 and the order dated 29th August, 2017 1 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, was disposed of by the impugned order.2. While examining the issue in detail, a brief narration of the facts of the case would be relevant: The Respondent No.2/complainant lodged FIR bearing Case Crime No.170/2014 dated 20th June, 2014 at Pol...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1304 OF2018PRADEEP KUMAR ...APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL, J.1. On 01.10.2003, Umesh Chowdhary, a resident of village Chitarpur falling within the territorial limits of Police Station Dhaurpur District was allegedly murdered by accused Pradeep Kumar (Appellant No.2 in CRA No.940 of 2004) before the High Court Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur and 2 Bhainsa alias Nandlal (Appellant No.1. before the High Court in the very same appeal) in relation to which FIR No.126/03 (Ex.P-6) was registered at Police Station Dhaurpur.2. On 02.10.2003, Investigation Officer, I. Tirkey (PW-19) commenced investigation and after verifying the place of occurrence sent the dead body for post-mortem analysis which was conducted by Dr. Kamlesh Kumar (PW-14) in terms of his report (Ex.P-10). Investigation revealed that the crime was committed on account of animosity which the Appellant...
Tag this Judgment!