Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.88 OF2021IN REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO.19482 OF2020IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.3441 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3441-3442 OF2019 EX. HAVILDAR BHOOP SINGH Petitioner VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents ORDER We have gone through the curative petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, (2002) 4 SCC388 2 The Curative Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ...........................CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit) .............................J.(Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) .............................J.(Sanjay Kishan Kaul) .............................J.(S. Abdul Nazeer) New Delhi, August 30, 2022...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) No.934 OF2022IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4139 OF2020Export Credit Guarantee Corporation (ECGC) Limited Petitioner Versus Haris Marine Products Respondent ORDER Application seeking oral hearing in the Review Petition is dismissed. After considering the facts on record and the rival submissions, by its detailed judgment dated 25.04.2022, this Court allowed the appeal, which judgment is now subject matter of the instant Review Petition. We have gone through the grounds raised in the Review Petition but do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference. 2 This Review Petition is therefore dismissed. .CJI. [Uday Umesh Lalit]. .J.[S. Ravindra Bhat]. .J.[Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha]. New Delhi; 30th August, 2022....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.210 OF2021IN REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1182 OF2018IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.2793 OF2012MARAYAMMAL & ORS. Petitioners VERSUS K.S. VENKIDUSAMY & ANR. Respondents ORDER Application seeking oral hearing is rejected. We have gone through the curative petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, (2002) 4 SCC388 2 The Curative Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ...........................CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit) ............................J.(Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) ............................J.(Sanjay Kishan Kaul) New Delhi, August 30, 2022...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.66 OF2021IN REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1837 OF2020IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.2210 OF2020ARJUN PRAKASH Petitioner VERSUS SHYAM SAHANI & ORS. Respondent ORDER Application seeking oral hearing is rejected. We have gone through the curative petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, (2002) 4 SCC388 2 The Curative Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ...........................CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit) .............................J.(Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) .............................J.(Sanjay Kishan Kaul) .............................J.(A.S. Bopanna) New Delhi, August 30, 2022...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.76 OF2021IN REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.980 OF2020IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.1637 OF2020M/s. ICE TV PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner VERSUS M/s. SREEDEVI DIGITAL SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondents ORDER Application seeking oral hearing is rejected. We have gone through the curative petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, (2002) 4 SCC388 2 The Curative Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ...........................CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit) .............................J.(Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) .............................J.(Sanjay Kishan Kaul) .............................J.(Indira Banerjee) New Delhi, August 30, 2022...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CURATIVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.120 OF2021IN REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1857 OF2020IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.2906 OF2020PM COLD STORAGE PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner VERSUS MONOTRONE LEASING PRIVATE LIMITED Respondent ORDER We have gone through the curative petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra & Another, (2002) 4 SCC388 2 The Curative Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ...........................CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit) ............................J.(Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) ............................J.(Sanjay Kishan Kaul) ............................J.(B.R. Gavai) ............................J.(Krishna Murari) New Delhi, August 30, 2022...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) No.OF2022(Diary No.9265 of 2022) IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.4714 OF2019Rakesh @ Bhura Rajak Petitioner Versus State of Madhya Pradesh Respondent ORDER Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Review Petition is allowed. The concurrent view taken by the Sessions Court and the High Court in convicting and sentencing the petitioner for having committed offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code was under challenge before this Court. Having considered the matter, this Court found no reasons to interfere and the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. 2 The grounds taken in Review Petition do not make out any error apparent on record to justify interference. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. .CJI. [Uday Umesh Lalit]. .J.[Ajay Rastogi]. New Delhi; 30th August, 2022....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.7951 OF2002VIRAJ TRA DESAI Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. Respondents WITH TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.194-202 OF2003SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.2833 OF2015WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.37-52 OF2002WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.284 OF2003TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.43 OF2004TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS.66-72 OF2004WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.216 OF2003SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.4409 OF2003WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) DIARY NO.17953 OF2003SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.3770 OF2003ORDER Prayer for transfer of investigation to Central Bureau of Investigation having been negated by the Division Bench of the High Court vide its Order dated 05.04.2002 in Special Civil Application No.3755 of 2002, the instant petition was preferred. 2 Around the same time, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.109 of 2003 at the instance of the National Human Rights Co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.5247 of 2022 Securities and Exchange Board Of India Appellant Versus Rajkumar Nagpal & Ors. Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.Table of Contents A. Facts .................................................................................................................. 4 i. The dispute .............................................................................................................. 4 ii. The suit before the Bombay High Court ............................................................... 5 iii. The impugned judgment ...................................................................................... 10 B. Issues ............................................................................................................... 12 C. Submissions ................................................................................................... 12 D. Overview of contractual...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION Arbitration Petition (Civil) No.05 of 2022 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. .... Petitioner Versus Afcons Gunanusa JV .... Respondent With Civil Appeal No 5880 of 2022 With Civil Appeal No 5879 of 2022 And With Miscellaneous Application Nos. 1990-1991 of 2019 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 10021-10022 of 2017 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are: A Factual Background .................................................................................... 5 A.1 Facts of Petition for Arbitration (Civil) No 5 of 2022 .............................. 5 A.2 Facts of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No 13426 of 2021 ................... 13 A.3 Facts of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No 10358 of 2020 ................... 17 A.4 Facts of Miscellaneous Application Nos 1990-1991 of 2019 .............. 19 B Submissions of Counsel ........
Tag this Judgment!