Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION Miscellaneous Application No.1150 of 2019 In Contempt Petition (Civil) No.1921 of 2017 In Civil Appeal No.6950 of 2009 Ranbir Singh Applicant/Petitioner Versus SK Roy, Chairman, Life Insurance Respondents Corp. of India & Anr. WITH MA11512019 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA18682019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA18622019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA18612019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 1 WITH MA18742019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA18732019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1660/2018 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA19402019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA18822019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA18832019 in CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA18762019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 WITH MA18882019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No.1921/2017 in C.A. No.6950/2009 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.2042 of 2022 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Respondents With T.C.(C) No.48/2016 With T.C.(C) No.47/2016 With T.C.(C) No.49/2016 And With T.C.(C) No.50/2016 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. These are: A Facts ....................................................................................................................3 A.1. Transferred cases arising out of the arbitration ................................................. 11 B Submissions of Counsel .................................................................................... 14 C Analysis ..............................................................................................................2 1 C.1. Group of Companies Doctrine......................................................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.3460 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.2950 of 2020 ) RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION JAIPUR AND OTHERS .... Appellant(s) Versus M/S JAIN BANDHU SNEH RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER. . Respondent (s) With Civil Appeal Nos. 3462-3463 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.4224-4225 of 2020) Civil Appeal No.3461 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.5473 of 2020) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted.1. The judgment dated 19.08.2019 of the High Court of Rajasthan in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.605 of 2018 and the order dated 04.01.2020 passed in DB Review Petition (Writ) No.187 of 2019 has been challenged in these Appeals. 1 | Pa ge For the sake of convenience, M/s. Rajasthan Financial Corporation has been referred to as The Corporation, M/s. Sun On Mount Hotels Pvt. Ltd. has been referred to as the Auction Purchaser and M/s. Jain Bandhu Sneh Resort Pvt. Ltd. as the Borrower.2. The ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3070 OF2022(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.34723 OF2016 ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO. (INDIA) LTD. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. Aggrieved by the opinion rendered by the Full Bench of the High Court of Gujarat in a Stamp Reference under Section 54(1)(a) of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), made by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority of the State of Gujarat, the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd., has come up with the above appeal. 12. We have heard Mr. V. Chitambaresh, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, learned counsel appearing for the State of Gujarat.3. The Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC for short) granted certain facilities to a borrower and the borrower committed default in repayment. Unable to recover the loan, the Bank assigned t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3189 OF2022(arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 4125 of 2019) KALYANI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE SULTHAN BATHERY MUNICIPALITY & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT VIKRAM NATH, J.Leave granted.2. Appellants - eight in number, have assailed the correctness of Judgment and Order dated 12.09.2018 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in W.A. No.2108 of 2016 between Sulthan Bathery Municipality vs. Kalyani and 12 others, whereby the judgment of the Single Judge was set aside and the writ petition filed by the appellants was dismissed. 13. The relevant facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the appellants are the owners of the land in dispute measuring 1.7078 hectares. The land is situate within the territorial limits of Respondent No.1, Sulthan Bhathery Grama Panchayat (hereinafter referred to as the Panchayat), later on declared a Municipa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.18890 of 2021) AKHILESH PRASAD Appellant versus JHARKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS. Respondents JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal challenges the judgment and final order dated 12.05.2021 passed by the Division Bench of High Court1 in LPA No.609 of 2017.3. In the Graduate Level (Special) Competitive Examination held in the year 1994 for filling up the posts of Cooperative Development Officers, the then Bihar Public Service Commission vide letter dated 24.07.1995 1 High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. 2 recommended the name of the appellant, who was at serial No.98 in the merit list, under Scheduled Tribe (ST, for short) category. The claim that the appellant belonged to ST category (Gond) was supported by a Certificate issued to that effect on 03.06.1995 by the Scrutiny Officer, Sonpur (Saran) which place now fa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3185 OF2022(Arising out of SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CIVIL) No.3250 OF2020 SATWARATNA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. & ANR. Appellants VERSUS BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. Respondents JUDGMENT INDIRA BANERJEE J.Leave granted. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 25.04.2019 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, allowing Writ Petition No.1515 of 2017 filed by the Respondent No.1-Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and quashing an order passed by the Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, granting permission for redevelopment of a building to M/s. Satwaratna Cooperative Housing Society Limited being the Appellant No.1 before us, and hereinafter referred to as the Appellant-Society, subject to the conditions specified in the said order. Sometime in 1972-73, a residential building consisting of Ground + three floors was c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.71597160 OF2008SMT. KAITHUAMI [L]. THROUGH L.RS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SMT. RALLIANI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Application for substitution to bring on record legal representatives of the deceased appellant No.3Thanzami is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The present appeals challenge the common judgment and order of the Gauhati High Court, Aizawl Bench, dated 7th November, 2007, passed in RSA No.12 of 2006 with Cross Objection No.4 of 2006, vide which, the learned single judge of the High Court has allowed the said Second Appeal filed by the respondents herein and dismissed the crossobjection preferred by the appellants herein. 13. For appreciating the controversy in question, it will be appropriate to reproduce the family chart, which is as under: C Dr.LalrinlianaSallo(p-1D) 2 4. P.S. Dahrawka and Kaithuami, through whom the parties herein are claiming inherit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.694-695 OF2022(Arising out of SLP (Crl) Nos.5781-5782 OF2020 Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan Appellant(s) VERSUS The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.Leave granted.2. The challenge in these appeals is to the judgment and order dated 02.08.2019 in the Crl. M.C. No.414/2019 and Crl.M.A.No.1754/2019 whereby the Delhi High Court dismissed the application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) for quashing of the summoning order dated 1.6.2018 and the order framing notice dated 3.11.2018, issued against the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred Page 1 of 16 to as the N.I. Act). On the criminal complaint instituted by one Satish Gupta (respondent no.2), the order under Section 251 of the Cr.P.C. was issued against the appellant by the Magistrates Court. The...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 569-570 OF2022Shraddha Gupta Appellant Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh and Others Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 27.09.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.21964 of 2019 and the subsequent order dated 10.11.2020 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Review Application No.2/2019, the original accused, Shraddha Gupta, against whom an FIR has been filed under Section 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Gangsters Act, 1986), has filed the present appeals.2. The facts leading to the present appeals in nutshell are as under: That a written report was made by respondent no.4 herein (original informant) on 24.05.2016 to the effect that her sister and her family members had previous enmity wi...
Tag this Judgment!