Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION(CRL.) No.282 OF2022IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.612 OF2019MOHD. FIROZ . PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH . RESPONDENT(S) ORDER BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. The instant application has been filed by the applicant-appellant seeking the following prayers: (a) Pass an order clarifying that pursuant to the Judgment of this Honble Court dated 19.04.2022 in Criminal Appeal No.612 of 2018, the sentence to be served by the Applicant is life imprisonment simplicitor for the offence under Section 302, 5(m),(i) and 6 of the Protection of Children under Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO), imprisonment for a term of 20 years for the offence under Section 376A, IPC, rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for the offence under Section 366, IPC and rigorous 1 imprisonment for 7 years for the offence under Section 363, IPC. (b) Pass an order clarifying that the sentence imposed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Seoni under Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.21762 OF2017ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) APPELLANT(S) VERSUS AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No.8193/2012; C.A. No.5057/2012; C.A. No.5058/2014; C.A. No.9974/2018; C.A. No.5056/2012; C.A. No.4196/2015; C.A. No.4374/2015; C.A. No.9380/2017; C.A. No.13071/2017; C.A. No.12058/2017; C.A. No.16375/2017; C.A. No.12869/2017; C.A. No.17527/2017; C.A. No.21845/2017; C.A. No.5719/2018; C.A. No.9886/2018; C.A. No.9200/2018; C.A. No.9860/2018; C.A. No.10114/2018; C.A. No.1643/2019; C.A. No.3596/2018; C.A. No.6762/2018; C.A. No.3972/2018; C.A. No.3343/2018; C.A. No.3359/2018; C.A. No.3971/2018; C.A. No.3347/2018; C.A. No.6489/2018; C.A. No.10598/2018; C.A. No.7643/2018; C.A. No.8321/2018; C.A. No.8554/2018; C.A. No.9172/2018; C.A. No.10406/2018; C.A. No.11259/2018; C.A. No.11884/2018; C.A. No.226/2019; C.A. No.170/2019; C.A. No.2047/2019; C.A. No.2335/2019; C.A....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6876 OF2022Jaycee Housing Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Appellant(S) Versus Registrar (General), Orissa High Court, Respondent(S) Cuttack & Ors. With CIVIL APPEAL No.6878 OF2022With CIVIL APPEAL No.6877 OF2022JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 12.04.2022 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in respective writ petitions, by which, the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the respective writ petitions in which the appellants herein original writ petitioners challenged a 1 notification dated 13.11.2020, issued by the State of Odisha through its Principal Secretary, Law Department in establishing the Court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) as Commercial Courts for the purposes of exercising jurisdiction and powers under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the original writ petitioners have preferred the present appeals.2....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7630 OF2022(Arising out of SLP (C) No.21524 of 2018) JSK INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.Leave granted.2. The repudiation of a claim in respect of a Marine Cargo Open Policy gives rise to this appeal and the appellants are the claimants before us. The policy, initially covered a sum of rupees two hundred crores. Under the heading Risk Details, against Sl.No.1 of the policy document, next to the column Voyage, it was indicated from anywhere in India to anywhere in India. Period of Insurance was from 29th October 2009 to Midnight on 28th October 2010.There was subsequent addition of terms and raising of insurance coverage as well. Fresh 1 | Pag e endorsement schedules were issued incorporating the changes. These endorsement schedules, however, carried the expression Attached to and forming part of policy No.12012/21/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4324 OF2015BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4323 OF2015BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.1. These two appeals have been filed by BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. (C.A. No.4324 of 2015) and BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. (C.A. 1 No.4323 of 2015) (hereinafter referred to as Appellants) challenging certain findings of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi (APTEL) in the common judgment and order dated 28.11.2014 (Impugned Order) passed in Appeal Nos.61 and 62 of 2012 (Tariff Appeals). The Tariff Appeals were filed by the appellants before the APTEL challenging certain findings of the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) in the Tariff Order dated 26.08.2012 for Truing Up of financials for FY200809 and FY200910 and Ag...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REVISED JUDGMENT (With modifications as set out in the Order dated 18.10.2022 passed in M.A. No.1798 of 2022 in CA No.7261 of 2022) REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7261 OF2022(arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.506 of 2020) The Bengal Secretariat Cooperative ...Appellant Land Mortgage Bank and Housing Society Ltd. Versus Sri Aloke Kumar & Anr. Respondents JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is at the instance of a Co-operative Society registered under the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1940 (for short, the Act 1940) and is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court at Calcutta (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction, Appellate Side) dated 08.08.2018 in the CO No.2714 of 2014 by which the High Court rejected the civil revision filed by the Appellant Society herein thereby affirming the order passed by 1 the Civil Judge (Senior Division), 9th Court at Alipore, District South 24 Paraganas in t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.7604 of 2022 (@ Special Leave Petition (C) No.25127 of 2018) RAJ BALA & ORS. Appellants Versus RAKEJA BEGAM & ORS Respondents JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This instant Appeal arises out of the final judgment and order dated 24.08.2017 in F.A.O. No.5948 of 2013 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh. The Appellants- claimants who are respectively the wife and children of the victim of a motor vehicle accident are dissatisfied with and aggrieved by the said judgment and order and they filed this Appeal seeking enhancement of the quantum of compensation. Page 1 of 173. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of this Appeal are as follows: - On 11.08.2009, the deceased-Sudesh Kumar was amongst the passengers in a bus bearing registration No.JK-01Y-0432 of Jammu and Kashmir State Road Transport Corporation, driven by the deceased husband of the first Respondent, on i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.7605 of 2022 (@ Special Leave Petition (C) No.25303 of 2019) Divya Appellant Versus The National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. Respondents JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. Leave Granted.2. Little was known to the little girl when she was taken in an autorickshaw by her parents about the jinx that she had to face and the consequences which would be lifelong and haunting, both mentally and physically. On 08.08.1998, when the appellant/claimant was a suckling, to be precise aged two years, her parents took her in an autorickshaw bearing registration No.TN-29-0958. When they were travelling from near Vaishnav College, from west to east, a car bearing registration No.Page 1 of 21 TMQ-2266 driven rashly and negligently came from the opposite direction, that too through its off side, dashed against the autorickshaw. She sustained very serious injuries. Taking into account the injuries sustained and its serious cons...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1791 OF2022(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.351 of 2021) MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MANISH SISODIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) With CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1790 OF2022(@ Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.658 of 2021) JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.Leave granted.2. The order of summoning issued by the Additional Chief Metropolitan MagistrateI, Rouse Avenue Courts, New Delhi, in a criminal complaint of defamation filed by Respondent No.1 herein against six individuals, was challenged before the High Court unsuccessfully, by persons arrayed as Accused Nos.1 and 5 and hence both of them have come up with the above Criminal Appeals. 13. We have heard Shri R. Venkataramani and Ms. Pinky Anand, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel, as well as Shri Shadan Farasat, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.14. On 19.07.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7283-7284 OF2022(@ SLP (C) Nos. 31198-31199/2017) Sarup Singh @ Ram Sarup Appellant(s) Versus HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. and Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court reducing the amount of compensation from Rs. 20,64,000/- as awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) to Rs.11,34,136/- alongwith interest @ 6% p.a., the original claimants have preferred the present appeals.2. The deceased at the time of accident was of 28 years of age. The original claimants wife of the deceased, minor daughter, father and sister of the deceased filed the claim petition before the Tribunal. The learned Tribunal considered the notional income of the deceased at Rs. 10,000/- per month and thereafter adding 30% towards the 1 future prospect and thereafter...
Tag this Judgment!