Skip to content


Supreme Court of India Court July 2021 Judgments Home Cases Supreme Court of India 2021 Page 5 of about 44 results (0.061 seconds)

Jul 07 2021 (SC)

Dharmesh @ Dharmendra @ Dhamo Jagdishbhai @ Jagabhai Bhagubhai Ratadia ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.432 OF2021[Arising from SLP (Crl) No.673/2021]. DHARMESH @ DHARMENDRA @ DHAMO JAGDISHBHAI @ JAGABHAI BHAGUBHAI RATADIA & ANR. ... Appellants Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT ...Respondent JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. An unfortunate incident took place on 10.11.2019, which is alleged by the complainant to be caused by certain members of his caste providing assistance to the police which resulted in a free fight where the appellants herein were also present. Two persons succumbed to their injuries and an FIR was registered on 11.11.2019 with the Amreli Police Station against 13 persons, being CR No.I-94 of 2019 under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 506(2), 504, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 120B and 34 of the IPC as [1]. well as Section 135(ii) of the Gujarat Police Act. In pursuance of the investigations chargesheet was filed in the Court. A counter FIR was also filed on 11.11.2019, being I-95/2019 again...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2021 (SC)

Sri Sai Rr Institute Of Pharmacy Vs. Dr. A.p.j. Abdul Kalam Technical ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) NO.446 OF2021SRI SAI RR INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS DR. A.P.J.ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.448 OF2021SHRI BADRINATH COLLEGE OF PHARMACY ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS DR. A.P.J.ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Both these writ petitions filed by the petitioner colleges seek various directions, including the direction to respondent No.1 Dr. A.P.J.Abdul Kalam Technical University (hereinafter referred to as the University), i.e, to comply with 1 Notification dated 19.3.2021 issued by the State Government and grant conditional affiliation to the petitioner colleges for Academic Year 20202021; direction directing the University to organize special examinations for B. Pharma students for Academic Year 20202021 in view of the aforesaid Notification dated 19.3.2021; and direction t...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2021 (SC)

Ripudaman Singh Vs. Tikka Maheshwar Chand

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2336 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.4035 OF2017 .....APPELLANT(S) RIPUDAMAN SINGH VERSUS TIKKA MAHESHWAR CHAND .....RESPONDENT(S) ORDER Leave granted.1. The plaintiff is in appeal before this Court challenging the judgment and decree passed by the High Court on 28.10.2006 whereby appeal filed by the defendant was allowed and the suit for declaration challenging the orders passed in mutation proceedings was dismissed.2. The parties herein are the two sons of late Vijendra Singh. The appellant filed a suit for possession in the year 1978 disputing the Will dated 04.12.1958 executed in favour of the defendant. The appellant claimed half share of the land as described in the plaint. During the pendency of suit, a decree was passed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. The terms of compromise read as under:1. The plaintiff shall be delivered possession of Khasra No.513/1 area mea...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2021 (SC)

Rakesh Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.556 OF2021Rakesh and another Appellants Versus State of U.P. and another Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 10.09.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.2811 of 2008, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellants original accused challenging their conviction for the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w 34 of the IPC, passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, 1 Hathras (hereinafter referred to as the learned trial Court), the original accused nos. 1 & 3 have preferred the present appeal.2. That both the appellants herein along with one another accused Suresh were tried by the learned trial Court for the offences punishable under Section 302 r/w 34 of the IPC for having killed one Bhishampal Singh ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //