Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2624 OF2020(arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 13964 of 2018) RAJENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2625 OF2020(arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 16261 of 2018) RAJENDRA SINGH ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted.2. The High Court by the impugned order dismissed two appeals arising from separate orders of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) deciding 1 two accident compensation claims. The appellants had claimed further enhancement of compensation.3. The deceased in the first appeal was a housewife aged about 30 years. The second deceased was her daughter aged about 12 years. The claimants are the husband/father of the deceased and three minor siblings. The two deceased on 25.12...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.192 OF2011RANA NAHID @ RESHMA @ SANA & ANR. Appellants VERSUS SAHIDUL HAQ CHISTI Respondent JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 28.07.2010 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.295 of 2009 in and by which High Court allowed the revision petition filed by the respondent thereby setting aside the order passed by the Family Court which has converted the application for maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. into Section 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 and also setting aside the maintenance amount awarded to appellant No.1.2. Brief facts of the case which led to the filing of this appeal are that the marriage between appellant No.1-Rana Nahid @ Reshma @ Sana and respondent Sahidul Haq Chisti was solemnized on 1 08-03-1998 as per the Muslim rites and appellant No.2-son was born out...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2632 OF2020( Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.20569 of 2016) Surendra Kumar Bhilawe Appellant versus The New India Assurance Company Limited Respondent JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 23.2.2015 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, hereinafter referred to as National allowing Revision Petition No.4126/2014 filed by the Respondent, hereinafter referred to as the Insurer, setting aside an order dated 09.1.2014 Commission, 2 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur, hereinafter referred to as the District Forum allowing the Complaint Case No.404 of 2012; and an order dated 22.7.2014 passed by the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Pandri, Raipur (C.G), hereinafter referred to as the State Commission, dismissing an appeal being Appeal No.FA/14/8...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 (Non-Reportable) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) No.1531 OF2018SHAMITA SINGHA & ANR. ..PETITIONERS VERSUS RASHMI AHLUWALIA & ANR. ..RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.The petitioners in this proceeding are both daughters of Late Pawan Kumar Singha(deceased). They seek transfer of a suit for partition and certain other ancillary reliefs instituted in the Delhi High Court. The said suit has been 2 registered as CS(OS)No.2888 of 2014. The plaintiff in that suit is Rashmi Ahluwalia, who is the widow of the deceased. She was the second wife of the deceased. The petitioners in this proceeding, Shamita Singha and Masoom Singha are daughters of Pawan Kumar Singha, deceased, from his first marriage, which was later dissolved. Both of them have been impleaded as defendants in that suit for partition. The third defendant in that suit is Ms.Sanjana, who is the daughter of Rashmi Ahluwalia, from her first marriage. It has been pleaded in the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.488-489 OF2017Mustak @ Kanio Ahmed Shaikh Appellant versus State of Gujarat .Respondent JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal is against a common judgment and order dated 29th September 2015 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, dismissing Criminal Appeal No.1145 of 2006, filed by the Appellant, partly allowing Criminal Appeal No.567 of 2006, filed by Respondent State, affirming the judgment and order of conviction dated 18th January 2006, passed by Additional City Sessions Judge (Court No.6) at Ahmedabad City in Sessions Case No.245 of 2004, but enhancing the sentence of rigorous imprisonment from six to seven years, for offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. 2 The learned Sessions Judge had, by his aforesaid judgment 2. and order convicted the Appellant and one Salim alias Salim Chaurala Yakubhai Patel, hereinafter referred to as the first accu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.458 OF2020[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) NO.1882 OF2018 D. DEVARAJA Appellant OWAIS SABEER HUSSAIN Respondent VERSUS JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is against a judgment and order dated 31-1-2018 passed by the Karnataka High Court, disposing of the application of the appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing an order dated 27-12-2016 passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate III, Bengaluru City in PCR No.17214 of 2013, taking cognizance of a private complaint being PCR No.17214 of 2013 inter alia against the accused appellant, for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 220, 323, 330 348, 506B read with Section 34 2 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court did not quash the impugned order of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dated 27.12.2006, but remitted the complaint back to the Learned Additional Chief Metropol...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2617 OF2020(arising out of SLP (C) No.9866 of 2019) SIRI CHAND (DECEASED) THR. LRS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SURINDER SINGH ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been filed questioning the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 05.09.2018 dismissing the revision filed by the landlord-appellant.3. Brief facts giving rise to the appeal are: - 3.1 The appellant is a landlord of a shop measuring 14 sq. yds. Respondent took the shop on rent @Rs.2,000/- per month for 2 running a hair cutting and dressing work. The respondent-tenant on 27.07.1993 executed an agreement/rent deed undertaking to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- each month. The rent deed was to be applicable w.e.f. 28.07.1993. The house tax and electricity bills were undertaken to be paid by the tenant. Rent was to be paid up to 5th day in each month to the owner. In event, the tenant failed to make the paym...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2611 OF2020(arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 9689 of 2018) SAVITHA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/s. CHODAMANDALAM M.S. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant, a housewife, is in appeal against inadequacy of compensation granted to her in a motor accident case.3. The appellant while travelling in a bus belonging to respondent no.3 on 25.12.2008 met with an accident when a lorry rashly and negligently dashed against the bus. The appellant suffered nine injuries out of which seven were grievous in nature. P.W.4, the Orthopedic Surgeon who operated upon the appellant, deposed that she had suffered 32 per cent total body disability and was 1 not capable of doing household work. The Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.5,82,500/ with interest at the rate of 6%, redetermined by the High Court in appeal at Rs.6,50,350/.4. Learned...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2612 OF2020(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.28724 of 2018) Smt. Sangita Arya & Ors. Appellants versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT INDU MALHOTRA, J.Leave granted.1. 2. The present civil appeal has been filed by the Claimants/Dependents of one Harish Singh Arya, who died at the age of 35 years in a motor vehicle accident on 18.06.2007. On 18.06.2007, the deceased Harish Singh Arya had taken his uncle Govind Lal Arya, an Enforcement Officer for Passenger Tax, Champawat for inspection in his taxi. The taxi had stopped on the side of the road at Village Chandini near Tanakpur Khatema Road, Uttarakhand. The deceased 1 had gone to answer natures call on the side of the road, when at about 2:30 p.m., one Tata Sumo bearing No.UP 02D5208, being driven at a high speed from the wrong side of the road, hit the deceased, and seriously injured him. The Enforcement Team was able to sto...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Civil Appeal No.2573 of 2020 etc. (arising out of SLP (C) No.18525 of 2009 etc.) Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia etc. vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. etc. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2573 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.18525 of 2009) VINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIA Appellant Versus STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2574 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.22867 of 2009) (Arjunbhai Sumanlal Bhavsar vs. State of Gujarat and ors.) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2575 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.33708 of 2009) (Rajenbhai Baldevbhai Shah vs. Baljiben Kabhaibhai Patanwadia and ors.) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2576 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.22460 of 2009) (Rajenbhai Baldevbhai Shah vs. Laxmanbhai Fakirbhai and ors.) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2577 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.24357 of 2009) (Gopiraj Dhanraj Bagmar...
Tag this Judgment!