Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.581 OF2016FOUNDATION FOR ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FORE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR PETITIONER(S) Versus THE ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION THROUGH THE MEMBER SECRETARY RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta, J.1. The petitioner, Foundation for Organizational Research and Education Fore School of Management is a registered educational institution running courses in management. On 15th March, 2016, the petitioner applied to the respondent, the All India Council for Technical Education (for short the AICTE) for extension of approval of existing seats and for increase in seats in certain courses. On 25th April, 2016, the AICTE granted extension of approval to the petitioner for existing seats in the existing courses. However, in this communication nothing was 1 written with regard to the prayer for increase in seats. Correspondence was exchanged between the parti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.747 OF2019EDUCATION PROMOTION SOCIETY FOR INDIA AND ANOTHER PETITIONER(S) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta, J.1. By means of this writ petition the petitioner no.1 Society which claims to represent a large number of educational institutions including medical colleges running postgraduate (P.G.) medical courses, has prayed that this Court may grant extension of time to respective medical colleges/deemed universities for carrying out counselling for P.G. courses since large number of seats in these colleges are lying vacant.2. Shri Maninder Singh, learned senior counsel for the petitioners urges that these colleges have spent a huge amount of money on the infrastructure of the colleges. He submits that 1 there is an acute shortage of doctors in India and, in fact, the Union of India has permitted increase of seats in government medical colleges without increas...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CIVIL)NOS. 1380213805 of 2019 THE SILPPI CONSTRUCTIONS CONTRACTORS PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ETC. ETC. RESPONDENT(S) ORDER1 Keeping in view the urgency of the matter, after detailed hearing the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed and we had directed that a reasoned order would follow. Hence the present order.2. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 issued notice inviting tenders for two works at Kochi. The estimated cost of the works were Rs. 53 crores and Rs. 72 crores respectively. The petitioner The Silppi Constructions Contractors, (hereinafter referred to as the firm) uploaded its competitive bid on the site and complied with all the conditions. The technical bids of the petitioner were rejected by the tendering authorities on 28.03.2019. The petitioner filed 1 appeals before the appellate authority on 28.03.2019 itself which were rejected on 09.04.2019.3. Thereafter, the petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 21569/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-06- 2019 in CRMSTB No.1/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) SUNITA BHATI Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s) Date :21. 06-2019 This petition was mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. Pai Amit, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER List today at the end of the Board. [ CHARANJEET KAUR ]. [ VIDYA NEGI ]. A.R.-CUM-P.S. COURT MASTER ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.4 SECTION II REVISED S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 21569/2019 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-06-2019 in CRMSTB No.1/2019 passed by the High Cou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1801 OF2013State of Haryana Appellant Versus Angoori Devi & Anr. Respondents JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal filed by the State of Haryana is against a judgment and order dated 3.5.2012 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh allowing the appeal filed by the respondents, reversing the judgment of conviction passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajhar convicting the respondents under Sections 498A read with Section 304B of the Indian 2 Penal code and acquitting the respondents.2. The victim (Babli) and her sister (Neeru) were married to two brothers, Kartar (Respondent No.3) and Pawan, sons of Smt. Angoori Devi (Respondent No.1) and Akhey Ram (Respondent No.2). After 3 years of marriage the victim, wife of Kartar Singh (Respondent No.3) died of burn injuries.3. The victims father (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) lodged ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9750 OF2010State of Bihar & Ors. .. Appellants Versus Meera Tiwary & Anr. .. Respondents JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, filed by the State of Bihar & Others, is against the judgment and order dated 30.5.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna, disposing of the Contempt Application being MJC No.2194 of 2005, filed by the respondent no.1 with a direction to the competent authority to finalise the family pension due and payable to the respondent no.1, taking into account the notional salary, which was payable to her husband on the date of his retirement, that is, 30.6.1995, as early as possible and in any case within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order.2. Shri Amardeo Tiwari, since deceased, husband of the respondent no.1, was appointed Junior Engineer in the Public Works Department on or about 1.8.1958. He was promoted to the post of Temporary Assistan...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3747 OF2019Hari Sankaran ... Appellant Versus Union of India & Others ... Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned Order dated 31.01.2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Company Appeal (AT) No.29 of 2019 by which the learned Appellate Tribunal has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellant herein ExDirector of respondent No.2 Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited (hereinafter referred to as the IL&FS) and has confirmed the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal) dated 01.01.2019 by which the learned Tribunal allowed the said 2 application preferred by the Central Government under Section 130(1) & (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the Companies Act) and has permitted recasting and re opening of...
Tag this Judgment!