Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1411 OF2013State of Madhya Pradesh .. Appellant Versus Kalicharan & Ors. .. Respondents JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 18.11.2008 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Judicature at Jabalpur, Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No.43 of 1997 whereby the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal preferred by the original accused and set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 2 16.01.1997 passed by the learned Trial Court, whereby the learned Trial Court convicted the respondentoriginal accused for commission of the offence under Sections 148, 302/149, 325/149, 323/149 of the IPC and altered the conviction of the accusedRamavtar from Section 302/149 of the IPC to Section 304 Part II of the IPC and sentenced him to five years R.I. with fine of Rs.5000/ and set aside his conviction for the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1432 OF2012Kamlakar Versus .Appellant(s) State of Maharashtra .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.S. Bopanna,J.1. The appellant herein was arrayed as accused No.1 in the proceedings before the Sessions Case No.87 of 2005. Along with the appellant, five other accused, namely, accused Nos. 2 to 6 were also charged of the offences under Sections 147, 148 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that the accused persons were the members of an unlawful assembly and pursuant to the common object, had committed riot and armed with deadly weapon like katti committed murder of one Dhammanand, on March 13, 2005 at about 00.15 Hrs at Dhanegaon. The accused did not plead guilty of the charge and had sought that he be tried. The proceedings 2 was accordingly held in the Sessions Court at Nanded.2. The learned Sessions Court having considered the matter in detail, through its judgm...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.917944 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(Criminal) Nos. 49484975/2019 Surinder Singh Deswal @ Col. S.S.Deswal and others versus Virender Gandhi M.R. SHAH, J.Leave granted. JUDGMENT Appellants Respondent 2. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of appeals and, as such, all these appeals, arise out of the impugned common judgment and order passed by the High Court, are being decided and disposed of together by this common judgment and order.3. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, by which the High Court has dismissed the respective revision applications and has confirmed the order passed by the first appellate court learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panchkula, directing the appellants herein original 1 appellants original accused to deposit 25% of the amount of compensation, in view of the pro...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9023 OF2018Parsa Kente Collieries Limited ..Appellant Versus Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited ..Respondent JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 28.02.2018 passed by the Commercial Appellate Court/Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.3785 of 2017, by which the High Court has allowed 1 the said appeal preferred by the respondent herein Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited and has quashed and set aside the award passed by the learned Arbitrator, confirmed by the Commercial Appellate Court at Jaipur, the appellant the original claimant Parsa Kente Collieries Limited has preferred the present appeal.2. That in the month of March, 2006, the respondent floated a tender for joint venture to undertake coal block development, mining and transportati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1475 OF2017GUMAN SINGH .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN .. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.The appellant, Guman Singh impugns judgment dated 10.03.2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur, which confirms his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC, for short) for murder of Shiv Charan and under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC for attempt to murder Babu Singh. Appellant stands sentenced under Section 302 IPC to life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to serve additional rigorous imprisonment for one year and for an offence under Section 307 IPC to rigorous imprisonment of 10 years with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment, an additional rigorous imprisonment of one year. Criminal Appeal No.1475 of 2017 Page 1 2. The conviction arises out of FIR No.464/2009 reg...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1791-1795 OF2014CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VERSUS .....APPELLANT(S) SAKRU MAHAGU BINJEWAR AND ORS. Etc. Etc. .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1802 OF2014AND CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1801 OF2014ORDER SURYA KANT, J.This is a set of cross-appeals preferred by (i) Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as CBI), and (ii) the convicts against the judgment dated 14th July, 2010 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur whereby five criminal appeals have been decided by way of a common order. While the CBI is aggrieved by the commutation of death sentence, the convicts (hereinafter referred to as the respondentsaccused in the lead case) 1 have questioned their conviction by the Special Court as affirmed by the High Court.2) Firstly, a very brief reference to the facts may be made. Bhaiyyalal Sudam Bhotmange was residing on the outskirts of Kh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.33602 OF2017 CIVIL APPEAL No.5011 OF2019CENTURY METAL RECYCLING PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.Leave granted.2. Impugned order dated 12th September, 2017 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismisses Writ Petition Tax No.307 of 2017 filed by the appellants, namely M/s Century Metal Recycling Pvt. Ltd. and Gauri Shankar Agarwala, inter alia, on the grounds that the High Court would not exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as the matter relates to the valuation of imported aluminium scrap which could be assailed in a statutory appeal and it would not be appropriate for the writ court to decide whether the appellant had or had not agreed to valuation by the customs authorities. Civil Appeal arising out of SL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5012 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.23127 OF2018 ABDUL KUDDUS .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.5025 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No._13011 OF2019ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.25095 OF2017 CIVIL APPEAL No.5026 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.__13012 OF2019ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.25101 OF2017 CIVIL APPEAL No.5013 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.25052 OF2017 CIVIL APPEAL No.5014 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.2512 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.5015 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.5342 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.5024 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No._13010 OF2019ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.26459 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.5016 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.26935 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.. OF2019@ SLP(CRL.) No.1907 OF2019NARAD PATEL VS. SATE OF CHHATTISGARH1Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.883 OF2019(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.1907 of 2019) NARAD PATEL Appellant STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondent VERSUS JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal challenges the correctness of the final Judgment and Order dated 27.11.2018 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No.1101 of 2002.3. The appellant was tried in Special Case no.13 of 2002 on the file of the Special Judge, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh for having committed offences punishable under Sections 294, 506-B of IPC and under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (the Act, for short). It was alleged that during the night intervening 30.09.2001 and 01.10.2001 the appellant had cut the hedge (Medh) of the paddy field ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4875-4884 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.21962-21971 OF2018 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER ...Appellants TWAD BOARD & ANOTHER VERSUS M. NATESAN ETC. ...Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals arise out of the judgment dated 16.12.2016 passed by the High Court of Madras in Writ Appeal No.1434 of 2016 and batch in and by which the High Court has affirmed the order of the learned Single Judge directing reinstatement and the back wages at 50%.3. Between 1986-89, the respondents were engaged as Store Watchman on daily wages under NMR basis temporarily in newly created Sectional stores in various Sub Divisions under the control of Rural Water Supply (RWS) Divisions, Nagercoil. In the Engagement Order, it has been specifically mentioned that the 1 engagement on daily wage basis will be purely temporary and the services will be terminated when the requirement is over and that they...
Tag this Judgment!