Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.71 OF2012RUPALI DEVI APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.619 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5695/2010]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.620 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.8246/2010]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.621 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.7387/2011]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.622 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5052/2014]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.623 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5139/2014]. JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 Whether a woman forced to leave her matrimonial home on account of acts and conduct that constitute cruelty can initiate and access the legal process within the jurisdiction of the courts where she is forced to take shelter with the parents or other family members. This is the precise question that arises for determination in this group of appeals.2. The opinions of this Court on the aforesaid question being sharply divided, the present ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.71 OF2012RUPALI DEVI APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.619 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5695/2010]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.620 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.8246/2010]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.621 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.7387/2011]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.622 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5052/2014]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.623 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5139/2014]. JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 Whether a woman forced to leave her matrimonial home on account of acts and conduct that constitute cruelty can initiate and access the legal process within the jurisdiction of the courts where she is forced to take shelter with the parents or other family members. This is the precise question that arises for determination in this group of appeals.2. The opinions of this Court on the aforesaid question being sharply divided, the present ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.71 OF2012RUPALI DEVI APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.619 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5695/2010]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.620 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.8246/2010]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.621 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.7387/2011]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.622 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5052/2014]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.623 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5139/2014]. JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 Whether a woman forced to leave her matrimonial home on account of acts and conduct that constitute cruelty can initiate and access the legal process within the jurisdiction of the courts where she is forced to take shelter with the parents or other family members. This is the precise question that arises for determination in this group of appeals.2. The opinions of this Court on the aforesaid question being sharply divided, the present ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.71 OF2012RUPALI DEVI APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.619 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5695/2010]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.620 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.8246/2010]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.621 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.7387/2011]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.622 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5052/2014]. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.623 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5139/2014]. JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 Whether a woman forced to leave her matrimonial home on account of acts and conduct that constitute cruelty can initiate and access the legal process within the jurisdiction of the courts where she is forced to take shelter with the parents or other family members. This is the precise question that arises for determination in this group of appeals.2. The opinions of this Court on the aforesaid question being sharply divided, the present ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.2176 OF2007JAGDISH PRASAD PATEL (DEAD) THR. LRS.& ANOTHER Appellants VERSUS SHIVNATH & OTHERS Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 05.02.2007 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur dismissing the Second Appeal No.174 of 1989 filed by the appellants, thereby affirming the decision of the first Appellate Court in Civil Appeal No.29-A/85 holding that in the absence of any order of abandonment or revocation of the patta given to the forefathers of the respondents-plaintiffs, grant of patta in favour of the appellants/defendants was illegal and that the appellants- defendants cannot claim any right over the suit properties.2. Case of Respondents-plaintiffs is as under:- Respondents-Shiv Nath and deceased Vishwanath/predecessor in interest of respondents No.2 to 10 filed a suit for declaration of title 1 over the suit lands in khasra numbers 41-1....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 725 OF2012PALAKOM ABDUL RAHIMAN Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER BADIADKA POLICE STATION, KERALA & ANR. .Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(s). 727 OF2012JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. The present appeals arise out of the judgment dated 16th November, 2007 passed by the High Court of Kerala in Criminal Appeals convicting the accused appellants(accused No.1 and accused No.3) for offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and also under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. 1 2. The accused persons faced trial for double murder of a father and son (Assainar & Abdul Rahiman) and causing grievous injuries to PW2 Mohammed, son of deceased Assainar. That in all, 11 persons were initially chargesheeted including appellants for offence punishable under Section 143, 148, 323, 324, 325 and 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. There was separate charg...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 36033607 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.70107014/2009) Shriram Tomar and another Etc. Appellants Versus Praveen Kumar Jaggi and others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.3608 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(C) No.6075/2009) Dev Narain Shukla and others ..Appellants Versus Praveen Kumar Jaggi and others ..Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Leave granted.2. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of appeals, and as such they arise out of the impugned 1 common judgment and order passed by the High Court, all these appeals are being decided and disposed of by this common judgment and order. 2.1 All these appeals arise out of the impugned common judgment passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh) passed in Writ Appeal Nos. 1510/2007, 1509/2007, 1508/2007, 1511/2007 and 1535/2007, by which the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the said appea...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO._3600 OF2019(Arising from SLP(C) No.4210 of 2019) Food Corporation of India ..Appellant Versus Rimjhim ..Respondent JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 03.08.2018 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in L.P.A. No.383 of 2018, by which the Division Bench has allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondent herein the original writ petitioner and has quashed and set aside the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court, dismissing the 1 writ petition preferred by the original writ petitioner and consequently quashed and set aside the action of the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the FCI) rejecting the case of the original writ petitioner for appointment on the post of Assistant GradeII(Hindi), the original respondent the appellant herein ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 694695 OF2011SAMPAT BABSO KALE & ANR. APPELLANT(S) Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta, J.1. These appeals by the accused are directed against the judgment of the High Court of Bombay dated 13.10.2010 in Criminal Appeal No.473 of 1991 whereby the appeal of the State was allowed and the appellants were convicted for offences punishable under Section 302/498A of Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) read with Section 34 of IPC and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.2. Briefly stated the facts are that the Appellant No.2, Tarabai Dhanaji Dhaigude is the sister of the Appellant No.1, Sampat 2 Babso Kale. Appellant No.1, was married to Sharada Sampat Kale on 25.04.1987. After residing for about one year at Thergaon, Chinchwad, they shifted to a quarter in MIDC Colony, Chinchwad. Sharada died of burn injuries suffered during the night intervening 08.07.1989...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.636 of 2019 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.8641/2018) BASALINGAPPA ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MUDIBASAPPA ...RESPONDENT(S) ASHOK BHUSHAN,J.JUDGMENT This is an appeal by accused challenging the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dated 04.07.2018 by which judgment the Criminal Appeal filed by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused has been allowed and the accused has been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to fine of Rs.8,00,000/-, in default of which to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.2. The brief facts of the case for deciding the appeal are:- 1 2.1 The complainant gave a notice dated 12.03.2012 to the accused, the appellant stating dishonour of cheque dated 27.02.2012 for an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- for want of sufficient funds. Thereafter, on non-payment of the amount, a complaint dated 25.04.2012 was filed by the complai...
Tag this Judgment!