Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8430 OF2018VIJAY KUMAR JAIN APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STANDARD CHARTERED BANK & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1266 OF2018JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1. The present appeal arises out of an Appellate Tribunals judgment rejecting the appellants prayer for directions to the resolution professional to provide all relevant documents including the insolvency resolution plans in question to members of the suspended Board of Directors of the corporate debtor in each case 1 so that they may meaningfully participate in meetings held by the committee of creditors [CoC]..2. We may take the facts of Civil Appeal No.8430 of 2018. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. the corporate debtor, was incorporated on 06.01.1986. It is said to be a profit-making company in the business of processing of oil-seeds and refining crude oil for edible use. In September, 2017, Company Petition Nos.1371 and 1372 were filed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.73907391 OF2009N. Sankaranarayanan .Appellant(s) VERSUS The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board & Ors. .Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.74057406 OF2009Aruna Theatres & Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. .Appellant(s) VERSUS The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.In Civil Appeal Nos.73907391 of 2009 1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 04.03.2008 passed by 1 the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No.1499 of 2005 and Writ Petition No.5718 of 2005 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the writ appeal and the writ petition filed by the appellant herein.2. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in these appeals, it is necessary to set out few relevant facts hereinbelow.3. The appellant herein is the appellant in Writ Appeal No.1499 of 2005 and writ petitioner in W.P. No.5718 of 2005 whe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1330 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(c) No.9394 of 2012) Smt. Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar (D) Th. LR .Appellant(s) VERSUS Arthur Import and Export Company & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 30.09.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.6235 of 2011 whereby the Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants herein. 1 3. Few facts need mention infra to appreciate the short controversy involved in this appeal.4. The dispute, which has reached to this Court in this appeal at the instance of one party to such dispute, arises out of and relates to the entries made in the revenue records in relation to the disputed land.5. The dispute began from the Court of Superintendent of land records. Thereafter it reached to the Deputy Director of Lan...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1331 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.23299 of 2018) Shri Rajendra Lalitkumar Agrawal .Appellant(s) VERSUS Smt. Ratna Ashok Muranjan & Anr. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Second Appeal No.44 of 2017 whereby the High Court dismissed the second appeal filed by the appellant herein. 1 3. In order to appreciate the short controversy involved in this appeal, few relevant facts need mention hereinbelow.4. The appellant is the plaintiff whereas the respondents are the defendants in the civil suit out of which this appeal arises.5. The appellant filed a civil suit against the respondents for specific performance of the contract in relation to the suit property. The said suit was based on an agreement dated 08.08.1984. The respondents filed their writ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.57535754 OF2011Mahadev P Kambekar (D) TR. LRS. .Appellant(s) VERSUS Shree Krishna Woolen Mills Pvt. Ltd. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 19.07.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No.169 of 1999 in Suit No.503 of 1980 and in Appeal No.199 of 1999 in Suit No.503 of 1980 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court allowed both the appeals filed by the appellants 1 herein (defendant) and the respondent(plaintiff) herein respectively.2) In order to appreciate the controversy involved in these appeals which lies in a narrow compass, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts hereinbelow.3) The appellants are the legal representatives of Mahadev Pandurang Kambekar, who was the original defendant whereas the respondentShree Krishna Woolen Mills Pvt. Ltd. is the plaintiff in the Civil Suit ou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Civil Appeal No1299./2019 @ SLP(C)No.27695/2018 Sumit Kumar Saha vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Reportable CIVIL APPEAL NO.1299 OF2019(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.27695 of 2018) SUMIT KUMAR SAHA Appellant VERSUS RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ... Respondent JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1.2. Leave granted. This appeal arises out of final judgment and order dated 16.02.2018 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission (the National Commission, for short) in First Appeal No.182 of 2014.3. On 27.03.2007 the appellant purchased one Volvo Hydraulic Excavator for a sum of Rs.49,75,000/- with VAT amounting to Rs.1,99,000/-, the total purchase value thus being Rs.51,74,000/-. Immediately after the purchase said Hydraulic Excavator was insured with the respondent vide Civil Appeal No1299./2019 @ SLP(C)No.27695/2018 Sumit Kumar Saha vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. 2 Contrac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s) 1316 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 33030 of 2013) DELHI DAYALBAGH HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY VERSUS .Appellant(s) REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) AND CIVIL APPEAL NO(s) 1317 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 4518 of 2013) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.Civil Appeal arising out of SLP(C ) No.33030/2013 Leave granted.2. Civil Appeal arising out of SLP(C ) No.33030/2013 has been filed assailing the order dated 2nd July, 2013 passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies under Section 94 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003. Indisputedly, the Order passed by the Registrar under challenge before us dated 2nd July, 2013 is 1 appealable under Section 112 of Act 2003. The appellant approached directly to this Court primarily on the premise as alleged that the judgment which was passed by the Delhi High Court i.e. the impugned judgment before us in Civil Appeal arising...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.884 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P (C) No.18502 of 2018) The State of Bihar & Anr. ........Appellants Versus Dr. Sachindra Narayan & Ors. ........Respondents JUDGMENT Hemant Gupta, J.The present appeal is directed against an order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna on 13.03.2018 whereby the Writ Petition was allowed directing the appellant to provide financial assistance for payment of the arrears as well as current pension to the employees of the Anugraha Narayan Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna (Institute).2. The Institute is incorporated by the Anugraha Narayan Sinha Institute of Social Studies Act, 1964, (Act). The Institute has a perpetual succession and a common seal. The Chairman of the Board of Control is 1 a nominee of the State Government. The State Government is also to nominate two persons of eminence in consultation with the Chairman; whereas, the o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s) 1313 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 8138 of 2013) DELHI DAYALBAGH COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. .Appellant(s) VERSUS REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS. ..Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s) 1314 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 9015 of 2010) CIVIL APPEAL NO(s) 1315 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 26905 of 2010) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 8138 of 2013, SLP(Civil) No(s). 9015 of 2010, SLP(Civil) No(s). 26905 of 2010 1.2. Leave granted. The above noted appeals are directed against the orders separately passed by the High Court of Delhi in writ petitions filed at the instance of the present appellant Society which came 1 to be dismissed upholding the order of the Cooperative Tribunal setting aside the award passed by the Registrar Cooperative Societies holding that the Arbitrator had no jurisdiction to examine the vali...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL No.171 of 2019 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.10681/2015) THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DHARMENDRA RATHORE ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.172 of 2019 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.10671/2015) THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RAMU @ BRAJMOHAN JADON ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN,J.Leave granted.2. These two appeals raising similar question of law has been heard together and are being decided by this 1 common judgment. State of Madhya Pradesh has filed the appeal questioning the judgment of Division Bench of the High Court dated 30.10.2013 passed in Writ Appeal No.244 of 2013 and judgment of Division Bench in Writ Appeal No.71 of 2014 dated 20.06.2014 following the earlier judgment dated 30.10.2013.3. For deciding the appeals, it shall be sufficient to refer to the facts in Civil Appeal The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Dhar...
Tag this Judgment!