Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4398 OF2016Anil Kumar .Appellant(s) VERSUS Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is filed by the claimant against the final judgment and order dated 19.03.2015 passed by the High Court of Karnataka Bench at Dharwad in Misc. First Appeal No.24385 of 2011(MV) whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the claimant (appellant herein) and affirmed the judgment and award dated 12.04.2011 passed by the Member, MACTII, Bellary in M.V.C. No.711 of 2010. 1 2. Few relevant facts need to be mentioned hereinbelow to appreciate the question involved in the appeal.3. The appellant was working as a cleaner in a lorry bearing Regn. No.AP21/V4682 belonging to respondent No.2 herein. At the relevant time, it was insured with respondent No.1. On 05.12.2004, at about 1.00 p.m. near VGM Factory, Belgal Road, Bellary, when the appellant...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9100 OF2018(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.20085 of 2017) NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .. APPELLANT VERSUS ASHALATA BHOWMIK AND ORS. .. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT S.ABDUL NAZEER, J.1. 2. Leave granted. National Insurance Co. Ltd. has filed this appeal challenging the judgment and order in MACAP No.25/2015 dated 15th March, 2017 whereby the High Court of Tripura at Agartala has directed the appellant-insurer to pay the compensation to the respondents awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, West Tripura, Agartala (for short 'the Tribunal') in a sum of Rs.10,57,800/- with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of payment. 1 3. The first respondent is the mother of deceased Dilip Bhowmik. The second respondent is his wife and respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are his children. On 20.5.2012 at about 7.00 p.m. Dilip Bhowmik was returning from Kathaltali to his...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6409 of 2017 Reportable KAILASH SINGH .APPELLANT Versus THE MANAGING COMMITTEE, MAYO COLLEGE, AJMER & ORS. .RESPONDENTS With Civil Appeal No.6410/2017 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Mayo College, Ajmer is an educational institution founded in 1875 by Sir Richard Southwell Bourke, the 6th Earl of Mayo, who was also the Viceroy of India from 1868 to 1872. It is one of the oldest educational institutions which was set up as a public boarding school, offering admission to the then elite. This character of the institution changed in the post-independence era, but it continued to be a prestigious centre of learning. The Mayo College is an unaided, non- governmental educational institution receiving no grant either from the State or the Central Government and is affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi, for purposes of students taking that examination to pass the 12th standard. 1 2. The ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013BIR SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 99359937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8802 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1086 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.9048 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P(C) NO.36324 OF2017 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.36324 of 1. 2017 2. In State of Uttaranchal vs. Sandeep Kumar Singh and others1 [Civil Appeal No.4494 of 2006) the following question arose for consideration of this Court: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in relation to a particular State would be entitled or not, to the benefits or concessions allowed to 1 (2010) 12 SCC7942 Scheduled Caste candidate in the matter of employment, in any other State?. 3. In the course of the deliberations that took place this Court noticed the Constitution Bench judgments o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013REPORTABLE BIR SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 99359937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8802 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1086 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.9048 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P(C) NO.36324 OF2017 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J1 Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.36324 of 2017 2. In State of Uttaranchal vs. Sandeep Kumar Singh and others1 [Civil Appeal No.4494 of 2006) the following question arose 1 (2010) 12 SCC7941 for consideration of this Court: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in relation to a particular State would be entitled or not, to the benefits or concessions allowed to Scheduled Caste candidate in the matter of employment, in any other State?. 3. In the course of the deliberations that took place this Court noticed the Constitution Bench judgments of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013BIR SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 99359937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8802 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1086 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.9048 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P(C) NO.36324 OF2017 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.36324 of 1. 2017 2. In State of Uttaranchal vs. Sandeep Kumar Singh and others1 [Civil Appeal No.4494 of 2006) the following question arose for consideration of this Court: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in relation to a particular State would be entitled or not, to the benefits or concessions allowed to 1 (2010) 12 SCC7942 Scheduled Caste candidate in the matter of employment, in any other State?. 3. In the course of the deliberations that took place this Court noticed the Constitution Bench judgments o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013BIR SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 99359937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8802 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1086 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.9048 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P(C) NO.36324 OF2017 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.36324 of 1. 2017 2. In State of Uttaranchal vs. Sandeep Kumar Singh and others1 [Civil Appeal No.4494 of 2006) the following question arose for consideration of this Court: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in relation to a particular State would be entitled or not, to the benefits or concessions allowed to 1 (2010) 12 SCC7942 Scheduled Caste candidate in the matter of employment, in any other State?. 3. In the course of the deliberations that took place this Court noticed the Constitution Bench judgments o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013BIR SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 99359937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8802 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1086 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.9048 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P(C) NO.36324 OF2017 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.36324 of 1. 2017 2. In State of Uttaranchal vs. Sandeep Kumar Singh and others1 [Civil Appeal No.4494 of 2006) the following question arose for consideration of this Court: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in relation to a particular State would be entitled or not, to the benefits or concessions allowed to 1 (2010) 12 SCC7942 Scheduled Caste candidate in the matter of employment, in any other State?. 3. In the course of the deliberations that took place this Court noticed the Constitution Bench judgments o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013BIR SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 99359937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8802 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1086 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.9048 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P(C) NO.36324 OF2017 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.36324 of 1. 2017 2. In State of Uttaranchal vs. Sandeep Kumar Singh and others1 [Civil Appeal No.4494 of 2006) the following question arose for consideration of this Court: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in relation to a particular State would be entitled or not, to the benefits or concessions allowed to 1 (2010) 12 SCC7942 Scheduled Caste candidate in the matter of employment, in any other State?. 3. In the course of the deliberations that took place this Court noticed the Constitution Bench judgments o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1085 OF2013REPORTABLE BIR SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S) 99359937 OF2014WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10081 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8141 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 8802 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1086 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.9048 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P(C) NO.36324 OF2017 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J1 Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.36324 of 2017 2. In State of Uttaranchal vs. Sandeep Kumar Singh and others1 [Civil Appeal No.4494 of 2006) the following question arose 1 (2010) 12 SCC7941 for consideration of this Court: Whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in relation to a particular State would be entitled or not, to the benefits or concessions allowed to Scheduled Caste candidate in the matter of employment, in any other State?. 3. In the course of the deliberations that took place this Court noticed the Constitution Bench judgments of th...
Tag this Judgment!