Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5838 OF2018(Arising out of SLP (C) No.12472 OF2018 U.P.P.S.C., Through its Chairman & Anr. Appellant (s) Versus Rahul Singh & Anr. Respondent(s) With CIVIL APPEAL NO.5839 OF2018(Arising out of SLP (C) No.13166 of 2018) And CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5840-5842 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.13567-13569 OF2018 JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta, J.Applications for impleadment are allowed.2. Leave granted.3. These appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment since they arise out of one judgment delivered by the High Court of Allahabad on 30.03.2018. 2 4. Briefly stated, the facts necessary for the decision of this case are that the appellant U.P. Public Service Commission (for short the Commission) issued an advertisement on 22.02.2017 inviting applications for filling up vacancies in the Upper Subordinate Services of the State. The selection is conducted through a three stage test consisting of preliminary written...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.551 OF2018Disha Panchal and Others .Petitioners Versus Union of India The Secretary and Others . Respondents With WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.554 OF2018Rishi Dutt .Petitioner Union of India and Others Versus With . Respondents WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.621 OF20182 Yash Singhania .Petitioner Union of India and Others Versus With . Respondents WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.600 OF2018Akshat Aggarwal & Ors. .Petitioners Union of India and Others Versus . Respondents JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. These petitions highlight improper conduct of Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2018 by Respondent Nos.2 and 3, which is a single window online entrance test for admission to 19 prestigious National Law Universities in the country. The petitioners had appeared for said CLAT and had faced various difficulties, which according to them, were occasioned as a result of mismanagement by respondent Nos.2 and 3. Some of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Reportable Civil Appeal No.5805 of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.11164 of 2018) Medical Council of India .... Appellant Vedantaa Institute of Academic Excellence Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Versus .Respondents JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. Leave granted. Vedantaa Institute of Academic Excellence Pvt. Ltd. and Vedantaa Institute of Medical Sciences, Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein filed Writ Petition No.4319 of 2018 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking a direction to the Appellant to send its Experts team for the purpose of verifying the compliance of the deficiencies pointed out earlier. They also prayed for a direction to the Appellant to forward its recommendation to the Central Government before 30th April, 2018. They sought a further direction to Respondent No.3 herein, Union of India to 1 consider the grant of renewal permission on the basis of the recommendations received from the Appellant. The High Court al...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NONREPORATABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1022 OF2011JAYASWAMY ...APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.By the impugned judgment dated 12.08.2010 in Criminal Appeal No.1498 of 2004, the High Court has reversed the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court in S.C. No.143/1994 insofar as the appellant (accused No.1) is concerned, and consequently convicted the appellant for the offences under Sections 302 and 326 of IPC. The High Court further, confirmed the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court insofar as it relates to accused Nos. 2 to 5.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that at about 4:30 pm on 15.01.1994, the accused Nos. 1 to 3 (including the appellant) along with accused Nos.4 and 5, with the common intention of 2 committing murder of deceased persons, namely Kumari Radhika (aged about 11 years) and Smt. Manjula, as well as to cause grievous hu...
Tag this Judgment!