Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4632-4638 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.21856-21862 OF2010 Telangana Housing Board versus ......Appellant Azamunnisa Begum (Died) Thru. Lrs. & Ors. ....Respondents JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.Leave granted.1. The question for our consideration relates to the interpretation of Section 87 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli and the meaning of the expression clerical error. The further question is whether a clerical error can be corrected at any time or only within a reasonable time.2. In our opinion, the correction sought to be made by the respondents is not a clerical error and so the further question really does not arise. However, the expression at any time cannot be interpreted to stretch over a period of 25 years, as in the present case. C.A. Nos.______________/2018 (@ SLP (C) Nos. 21856-21862 of 2010) Page 1 of 31 Land Acquisition Proceedings 3. On 24th May,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.654 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.7049 of 2014) Chandra Bhawan Singh .Appellant(s) VERSUS The State of Uttar Pradesh .Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.655 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No.7664 of 2014) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. These appeals are filed by the accused persons against the final judgment and order dated 20.05.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.1114 of 1986 whereby the High 1 Court dismissed the appeal in respect of the appellants-accused and affirmed the judgment and order dated 07.05.1986 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur in Sessions Trial No.291 of 1984.3. In order to appreciate the issues involved in the appeals, it is necessary to set out the facts of the case.4. Four persons, namely, (1) Tribhuwan Singh (appellant), (2) Chandra Bhawan Singh (appellant) (3) Smt. Makoi Devi and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE INTHESUPREMECOURTOFINDIA CIVILORIGINALJURISDICTION WRITPETITION(C)No.76OF2018 ALAKHALOKSRIVASTAVA ......PETITIONER VERSUS UNIONOFINDIA&ORS. .......RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT DipakMisra,CJI. TheinstantWritPetitioninitiallyraisedtwoissues,first,the treatmentofaneightmontholdfemalechildwhohadbecomea victim of a crime committed under the Protection of Children fromSexualOffencesAct,2012(forbrevity,thePOCSOAct)and thesecond,speedytrialandmonitoringofthetrialsunderthe POCSOActinachildfriendlycourtregardbeinghadtotheletter andspiritoftheprovisionscontainedinthesaidAct. 2 2. The first prayer was dealt with vide orders dated 31st January,2018,1st February,2018and12th March,2018.Itis necessary to note here that regard being had to the health condition of the child, a team of doctors from the All India InstituteofMedicalSciences(AIIMS)wassenttovisitthepatient atKalawatiSaranChildrenHospital.Thatapart,adirectionwas issued to the authorities of ...
Tag this Judgment!