Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4088 OF2010SMT. LAKSHMAMMA ....APPELLANT(s) VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ......RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.The appellant assails the orders of the Bangalore Development Authority (hereinafter called as the Authority) dated 15.11.2006 and 17.09.2003, as affirmed by the High Court. The former declines to restore khata in the name of the appellant, and the latter cancels the khata standing earlier in the name of the appellants vendor. 1 2. The Scheduled Caste (Harijan) House Building Co-operative Society Limited (hereinafter called as the Society), respondent no.2, was allotted 4 acres 23 guntas of land in Survey No.32 of Marenahalli for development of residential layout for its members. Bye law No.5(iii) restricted membership of the Society to Scheduled Caste persons only. The Society allotted and sold site no.10 to the appellants vendor on 24.12.1985. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3352/2018 (ARISING FROM SLP (C) No.7492/2018) NON-REPORTABLE VINOD APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE, CHANDRAPUR & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) KURIAN, J.JUDGMENT Leave granted.2. In the nature of order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents since the interest of the respondents is not otherwise affected.3. The appellant has been non-suited by the High Court on the ground that the second writ petition filed is not maintainable, having withdrawn earlier writ petition without any leave.4. Writ Petition No.2748/2016 reads as follows:- The order dated 28.07.2016 passed in the earlier Shri V.A. Dhabe, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is granted. The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. 1 It is fairly clear that the petition was 5. withdrawn only on account of the pendency of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)8293 OF2018[Arising out of D. No.15103/2017]. Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis . Petitioner Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice .Respondents Vs. S.A.BOBDE & L.NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.ORDER1 Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated on 30.1.1948; about 70 years ago. 9 accused were tried for the conspiracy and murder of Gandhiji. After trial the judgment was delivered by Learned Special Judge, Delhi on 10.02.1949 convicting seven accused and acquitting one. Accused Nathuram Godse and Narayan Apte were given death sentence, four of the accused were given life sentence and remaining one was given a sentence of seven years of Imprisonment. The conviction was challenged in Punjab High Court in Appeal, High Court vide judgment dated 21.06.1949 upheld the conviction for five of the accused persons and acquitted two of the accused persons. None of the accused are alive today.2. The petitioner who describes...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.423-424 OF2018State of Tamil Nadu .Appellant Versus S. Martin Etc. . Respondents JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. Original accused Nos.2 and 3 approached the High Court of Judicature at Madras by filing petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. namely Crl. O.P. No.13106/2013 and 14971/2013 respectively seeking quashing of Crime No.304 of 2012 registered pursuant to FIR304of 2012 dated 12.03.2012 with Adambakkam Police Station, Chennai. Said petitions were allowed by the High Court vide its common judgment and order dated 15.10.2014 which is presently under challenge at the instance of State of Tamil Nadu in these appeals by special leave. 2 2. The aforesaid FIR was registered pursuant to reporting by M. Nataraj, Inspector of Police, Crime, Adambakkam Police Station, Chennai. The FIR inter alia stated that the informant had received information that several crores of unaccounted money was stashed...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.470 OF2018(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.)NO.9393 OF2017 KRISHNAKANT TAMRAKAR APPELLANT THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VERSUS ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. Leave granted. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 3rd May, 2017 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in CRA No.1823 of 2009 whereby prayer for bail, pending disposal of criminal appeal against life sentence has been declined though the appellant has been in custody for more than ten years.2. The appellant stands convicted under Sections 148, 302/149 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment, apart from other sentences. According to the prosecution, on 23rd June, 2005 at 11.30 A.M., the appellant along with the co-accused caused the murder of one Shahid. In view of evidence in support of the 1 charge, the trial Court convicted and sentenced the appellant. The appellant applied for bail pending conside...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NOs.254-255 OF2017HARITA SUNIL PARAB ........PETITIONER(s) STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS VERSUS with .....RESPONDENT(s) TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NOs.253 OF2017HARITA SUNIL PARAB ........PETITIONER(s) VERSUS RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, RATLAM AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NOs.254-255 OF2017The present application seeks transfer of F.I.R. No.351 of 2016 under Sections 354, 354A, 323, 506, 509 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) registered at the Tilak Marg Police Station, New Delhi, and F.I.R. No.1742 of 2016 under Sections 379, 1 323, 376, 354, 506, 420, IPC before the Indirapuram Police Station, District Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh), registered on complaints lodged by the petitioner against respondents nos. 2 to 4, to the court of competent jurisdiction at Mumbai, Maharashtra.2. The petitioner, who appears in person, submits that she is a permanent...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1375-1376 OF2013Appellants Respondent ASIAN RESURFACING OF ROAD AGENCY PVT. LTD. & ANR. CENTRAL BURUEAU OF INVESTIVATION VERSUS WITH Criminal Appeal Nos.1383/2013, 1377/2013, 1382/2013, 1394/2013, 1384/2013, 1393/2013, 1386-1387/2013, 1385/2013, 1406/2013, 1396/2013, 1395/2013, 1391/2013, 1389/2013, 1388/2013, 1398/2013, 1397/2013, Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.2610/2013, Criminal Appeal Nos. 1390/2013, 1399/2013, 1402/2013, 1400/2013, 1401/2013, 1404/2013, 1403/2013, 1405/2013, Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 6835/2013, 6834/2013, 6837/2013, Criminal Appeal No.388/2014, Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos.10050-10051/2013, 9652-9653/2013, Criminal Appeal No.234/2014, Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 5678/2014, 1451/2014, 1399/2014, 2508/2014, 2970/2014, 2507/2014, 2939/2014, 2977/2014, 4709/2014, 6372/2014, 6391/2014, 6691- 6692/2014 and 9363/2017. 1 JUDGMENT Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.CRIMIN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3392 OF2006STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH . APPELLANT :Versus: RAVINDER KUMAR SANKHAYAN (DEAD) AND ORS. .RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3393 & 3394 OF2006JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. These appeals emanate from the judgment and interim orders dated 24th May, 2005 and 5th July, 2005 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Civil Writ Petition No.555 of 2004, during the pendency of the said writ petition. Civil Appeal No.3392 of 2006 has been filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh (for short the State) against the 2 judgment and order dated 5th July, 2005, whereas the other two appeals, i.e. Civil Appeal Nos.3393 & 3394 of 2006 have been filed by the Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation (for short HPTDC) against the judgment and orders dated 24th May, 2005 and 5th July, 2005, respectively.2. The stated writ petition was filed by the original respondent No.1, who died durin...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2247 OF2018(Arising out of SLP (C) No.5485 of 2017) SHIVAWWA AND ANR. . APPELLANTS :Versus: THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANR. . RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This appeal emanates from the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dated 9th July, 2015 in M.F.A. No.4401/2008 (MV) which had allowed the appeal filed by respondent No.1 (Insurance Company) and set aside the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short the Tribunal) granting compensation to the appellants. 2 2. A claim petition was filed in reference to the death of one Chanabasayya Sidramayya Hiremath, son of appellant No.1 and brother of appellant No.2 herein. On 23rd January, 2001, the deceased was returning, after unloading food-grains, on tractor-trailer bearing No.KA-29/T-1651/T-1652 belonging to respondent No.2, and being driven by an employee of respondent No.2, one Mallikarjuna Bee...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE / ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.3356 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.26993 of 2017) REPORTABLE Honble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad through Registrar General The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Appellant Respondent OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.8312 of 2018) 3355 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)D.No.39750 of 2017 Honble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad through Registrar The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.27284 of 2017 Dr. Ajay Krishn Vishvesha & Ors. Rajat Singh Jain & Ors. Versus WITH versus WITH Versus WITH Appellant Respondent Petitioner ...Respondent Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.27876 of 2017 Saroj Yadav & Ors. Petitioner versus The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad & Ors. Respondent 1 Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.8334 of 2018) (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)D.No.31887 of 2017 WITH Lal Bahadur-II &...
Tag this Judgment!