Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2326 of 2011 U.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION .... Appellant(s) Versus MANOJ KUMAR YADAV & ANR. .Respondent(s) WITH Civil Appeal Nos.2328-2330 of 2011 Civil Appeal No.2327 of 2011 JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Civil Appeal No.2326 of 2011 and Civil Appeal Nos.2328-2330 of 2011 : The Appellant is aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court by which the results of the main written examinations of Combined State/Upper Subordinate Service (Backlog/Special 2004 (hereinafter referred to as Backlog Examination, 2004) and Provincial Civil Service (P.C.S.) Examination, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the P.C.S. Examination, 2004) were quashed. Examination, Recruitment) 1 2. An advertisement was issued by the Appellant inviting applications for appointment to posts under the Combined State/Upper Subordinate Services in February, 2004. The preliminary examination was conducted on 19.12.2004 and the results wer...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.129 OF2018Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI The petitioner, a registered society, has preferred this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking appropriate directions for prohibiting the respondent Nos. 4 to 7 from releasing/screening/publishing feature film, namely, Aiyaary with direct or indirect references to the petitioner society's land/building/membership, for such an action is bound to affect the Right to Life under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. It is also prayed that the said respondents should be commanded to delete all those parts in the ensuing feature film which has direct or indirect references to the society in question. 2 2. It is contended by Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, that the film, which is going to be released, has projec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3370 OF2007Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd. .Appellant(s) VERSUS The Appellate Authority & Anr. Respondent(s) WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 3377-3381/2007, 3376/2007 and 3371-3375/2007 JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) These appeals are directed against the common final judgment and order dated 04.05.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in Writ Petition Nos.5858 of 2005, 2821, 2705, 2706/2006, 6219/2005, 721/2006, 3737/2005, 3935/2005, 1386, 1389, 1 1586 & 2060/2006 whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by the appellant herein and partly allowed the writ petitions filed by respondent-Consumer.2) The controversy involved in these appeals is short as it would be clear from the facts mentioned hereinbelow.3) For the sake of convenience, the facts pertaining to C.A. No.3370 of 2007 were taken into account. Respondent No.2 is running Oi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2114-2115 OF2018[Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.14441-14442 of 2017]. Chairman Cum Managing Director, Ennore Port Trust (Presently known as Kamarajar Port Limited) .. Appellants Versus V. Manoharan And Ors. .. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2116-2118 OF2018[Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.30359-30361 of 2017]. JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1)2) Leave granted. These appeals arise from the final judgment and order dated 05.01.2017 passed by the High Court of 1 Judicature at Madras in W.A. No.1020 of 2016, W.A. No.1351/2016 and W.A. No.1378 of 2016 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court while reversing/set aside the judgment of the Single Judge partly allowed the writ appeals and gave certain directions to the Port Trusts (appellants herein) for their compliance in favour of the writ petitioners (respondents herein).3) In order to appreciate the issues involved in these appeals, it is necessary to s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2693 OF2013UCO Bank & Ors. ....Appellants versus Rajendra Shankar Shukla ...Respondent JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.1. This appeal raises an interesting question of law on access to justice in a departmental inquiry. In our opinion, the respondent (Rajendra Shankar Shukla) was not given a fair opportunity to defend himself by denying him financial resources. On the merits of the case also, we are of the view that the impugned judgment and order of the High Court does not call for any interference.2. The allegation against Shukla was that while in charge of the extension counter of the UCO Bank from 3rd October, 1987 to 8th July, 1994 he issued a cheque on 25th January, 1991 for an amount of Rs.3 lakhs in favour of his brother. At that time, Shukla had only about C.A No.2693 of 2013 Page 1 of 9 Rs.1,000/- in his account. We are only concerned with this broad allegation.3. Shukla was issued a charge sheet...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2112 OF2018[Arising out of SLP (C) No.25814 of 2004]. G. Saraswathi & Anr. .. Appellants Versus Rathinammal & Ors. .. Respondents JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This appeal arises from the final judgment and order dated 21.04.2004 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in L.P.A. No.32 of 2000 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment and 1 decree dated 30.10.1998 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court in A.S. No.630 of 1984.3. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass and it would be clear from the facts stated hereinbelow.4. The appellants are the plaintiffs whereas the respondents are the defendants in the civil suit out of which this appeal arises.5. The appellants filed a civil suit against the respondents for specific performance of the agreement. The respondents filed their written statement and denied th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2113 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.14648 of 2017) Auto Cars .Appellant(s) VERSUS Trimurti Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) Leave granted.2) This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 24.04.2017 passed by the High Court at Calcutta in A.P.O. No.200 of 2017 in C.S. 1 No.15/14 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein and affirmed the order dated 18.08.2016 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court in GA No.766 of 2016, in consequence, affirmed the ex- parte decree dated 09.02.2015 in C.S. No.15 of 2014.3) The controversy involved in the appeal lies in a narrow compass. However, few facts need mention infra to appreciate the controversy.4) The appellant is defendant No.1 whereas respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are defendant Nos.2 and 3 in the civil...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1650 of 2018 SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED .Appellant versus ABDUL SAMAD & ANR. ..Respondents JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The divergence of legal opinion of different High Courts on the question as to whether an award under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) is required to be first filed in the court having jurisdiction over the arbitration proceedings for execution and then to obtain transfer of the decree or whether the award can be straightway filed and executed in the Court where the assets are located is required to be settled in the present appeal. CIVIL APPEAL No.1650 of 2018 Page 1 of 21 Facts:2. The appellant claims that the first respondent approached the appellant for grant of a loan for purchase of a Tata Lorry-HCV2005model, which loan was granted by the appellant on the terms & conditions specified in the Loan Agreement dated 18.8.2005. Res...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3585 OF2008Kurukshetra University .Appellant(s) VERSUS Prithvi Singh Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 22.09.2006 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No.13094 of 2006 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein and affirmed the Award dated 23.01.2006 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ambala in Ref.No.25 of 2003. 1 2. The controversy involved in the case is short as it would be clear from the narration of the relevant facts infra.3. The appellant is the Kurukshetra University (hereinafter referred to as the University). The respondent was working as Security Guard in the University as daily rated employee.4. On 18.08.1999, the respondent while on duty alleged to have misbehaved with one lady Research Scholar, who was workin...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2127 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.35758 of 2016) Khatoon & Ors. .Appellant(s) VERSUS The State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary & Ors. .Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.2128 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.34436 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL NO.2130 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.36516 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL NO.2129 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.249 of 2017) CIVIL APPEAL NO.2131 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.250 of 2017) 1 CIVIL APPEAL No.2133 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.1727 of 2017) CIVIL APPEAL No.2132 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.1723 of 2017) CIVIL APPEAL NO.2134 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.6339 of 2017) CIVIL APPEAL NO.2145 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.12373 of 2017) CIVIL APPEAL NO.2139 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.9581 of 2017) CIVIL APPEAL NO.2142 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.8326 of 2017) CIVIL APPEAL NO.2140 OF2018(Arising out of S.L....
Tag this Judgment!