Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4881 OF2010DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. By this appeal maintained under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2003), the appellant seeks to challenge the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission). 1 BACKGROUND FACTS2 The appellant is a statutory body constituted under the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the DVC Act). It was entrusted with multifarious functions. One of the functions it was entrusted was that it was duty bound to carry out generation, transmission and distribution of electrical energy both hydro electrical and thermal. It was also called upon to, op...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1512 OF2018(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) No.4762 OF2018 STATE OF PUNJAB APPELLANT VERSUS RAKESH KUMAR RESPONDENT WITH Criminal Appeal No.1514 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.4816 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1515 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.4817 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1517 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.4869 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1516 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.4818 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1513 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.4796 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1518 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.4881 of 2018) 1 Criminal Appeal No.1521 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.5032 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1530 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.5897 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1520 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.4968 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1526 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.5893 of 2018) Criminal Appeal No.1525 of 2018 (Arising ou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3168 OF2010Shri H.D. Sharma .Appellant(s) VERSUS Northern India Textile Research Association Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 06.02.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.2311/2009 whereby the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent herein and set aside the order of the Industrial Tribunal. 12) In order to appreciate the issues involved in this appeal, which lie in a narrow compass, few facts need mention hereinbelow.3) The appellant (workman) was appointed on 26.05.1978 as Duplicating Machine Operatorcum Clerk by the respondent Northern India Textile Research Association, Ghaziabad (UP). On 24.04.1987, the appellant was dismissed from service on five charges of misconduct after holding a Departmental Enquiry.4) The respondent (employer) on 27.04.198...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11759 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.30465 of 2017) Roshina T .Appellant(s) VERSUS Abdul Azeez K.T. & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 30.08.2017 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Writ Petition (C) No.15385/2017 whereby the Division Bench of the 1 High Court allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 herein and directed the appellant herein, by issuing a writ of mandamus, to restore the possession of the flat in question to respondent No.1 herein.3. Facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. They, however, need mention in brief infra to appreciate the short question involved in this appeal.4. The dispute essentially relates to the possession of a flat bearing No.3D, 3rd floor located in building known as Royal CourtBlock IV at Kozhikode (hereinafter referred to as the fla...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11763 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.28637 of 2018) Meera Mishra .Appellant(s) VERSUS Satish Kumar & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 12.07.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Bench at 1 Lucknow in Writ Petition No.3476 of 2007 whereby the Single Judge of the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 herein and set aside the order dated 14.02.2007 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mishrit cancelling the license of respondent No.1 for fair price shop and order dated 07.06.2007 passed by the Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow rejecting his appeals.3. The issue involved in this appeal is short as would be clear from the facts stated infra.4. The dispute relates to a fair price shop at Gram Panchayat Ambaghat, Block Godalamau, Tehsil Mishrit D...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6057 OF2012Mallappa Dead by L.Rs. & Ors. .Appellant(s) VERSUS The Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.1573 OF2018Arvind & Ors. .Appellant(s) VERSUS The Special Land Acquisition Officer Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.In Civil Appeal No.6057/2012 1. This appeal is directed against the final order/judgment dated 12.10.2007 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in M.F.A. No.594 of 2003 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal filed 1 by the respondents herein and reduced the compensation awarded to the appellants herein by award dated 30.09.2002 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division) Hubli in LAC No.58/87.2. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in this appeal, it is necessary to set out the facts of the case hereinbelow.3. The appellants are the claimants (landowners) and the respondents are the State Authoritiesno...
Tag this Judgment!