Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1258-1259 OF2018HIMACHAL ASSOCIATION & ANR. PRADESH CRICKET VERSUS .....APPELLANT(S) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.135 OF2017JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.Two FIRs are the subject matter of these appeals. One FIR No.12 of 2013 dated August 01, 2013 is under Sections 406, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) has been registered against the appellants herein as well as some other persons. Second FIR No.14 of 2013 dated October 03, 2013 is under Section 447 read with Section 120B of the IPC, Section 3 of Prevention of Criminal Appeal Nos. 1258-1259 of 2018 & Anr. Page 1 of 53 Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and Section 13(2) of the PC Act. The appellants filed petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) before the High Court of Him...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.8271 OF2018GEETA DEVI & ANR. .. Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN .. Respondent(s) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.8336 OF2018ORDER1 It is brought to our notice that an Arbitrator is appointed under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 at the instance of the parties to resolve the disputes arising between the parties, which are also subject matter of these special leave petitions. 1 2. If that be so, then the Arbitrator would mediate between the parties and submit his report by the next date of hearing on the disputes as to whether the parties have amicably settled the same or not, and if so, on what grounds.3. In the meantime and till next date of hearing, petitioner No.1Naresh Kumar of SLP(Crl.) No.8336/2018 shall not be arrested in connection with the offences in question.4. In the meantime, the interim order dated 11.10.2018 passed in SLP(Crl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10880/2018 (ARISING FROM SLP (C) NOS.32552 OF2017 NON-REPORTABLE ARUN KUMAR JHA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RANVIR SINGH & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.Leave granted.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the Insurance Company. There is no appearance for respondent No.1/owner.3. This is a case where the appellant was denied the benefit of functional disability. In view of the judgment of this Court in K. Janardhan v. United India Insurance Company Limited & Another, reported in (2008) 8 SCC518 the law is well settled that being a driver, in the nature of injury resulting in amputation of right leg below one third the thigh, there cannot be any dispute that there is 100% functional disability. The Commissioner, Workmen Compensation has granted compensation only to the tune of Rs.3,87,187/- with penalty. 1 4. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2/Insurance Company h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10873 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO.5895 OF2018 M/S HINDON FORGE PVT. LTD. & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GHAZIABAD & ANR. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10874 OF2018[ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO.12841 OF2018 JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1.2. Leave granted. These matters come to us from a Full Bench judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 06.02.2018. By an order of reference dated 19.09.2017, a learned Single Judge noticed divergent opinions expressed by two different Benches of the 1 Allahabad High Court on the question whether an application under section 17(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the SARFAESI Act or the Act), at the instance of a borrower, is maintainable even before physical or actual possession of secured assets is taken by b...
Tag this Judgment!