Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10574 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.19953 of 2015) The Life Insurance Corporation of India .Appellant(s) VERSUS Sri Kalappa M. Sankad (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted. 1 2. This appeal is filed against the impugned final judgment and order dated 13.02.2015 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Writ Appeal No.3120 of 2014(SRES) whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant.3. The issue involved in the appeal is short. It would be clear from the facts mentioned herein below.4. Mr. Kalappa M. Sankad was the original respondent herein. He died pending appeal and, therefore, represented by his legal representatives as respondents to continue the lis.5. Mr. Kalappa was working with the appellant Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) since 1988. He joined as an Apprentice Development Officer at Gulbarga office and th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.935 OF2018KAMAL NATH .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1000 OF2018JUDGMENT A.K.SIKRI, J.Writ Petition (Civil) No.935 of 2018 is filed by the petitioner, who is the President of the Madhya Pradesh Congress Committee, claiming the following reliefs: (a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents to issue directions for conducting VVPAT verification at least 10% randomly selected polling stations Writ Petition (Civil) No.935 of 2018 & Anr. Page 1 of 22 2 in each assembly constituency/assembly segment to ensure free and fair elections; (b) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents to publish voter list in text format as per rules, and to expeditiously decide all complaints qua final publication of voter list under Rules 22(1)(c) of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7608 OF2009Powai Panchsheel Coop Hsg. Society & Anr. .Appellant(s) VERSUS Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 26.03.2008 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No.2017 of 2003 whereby 1 the High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the appellants.2. In order to appreciate the issues involved in this appeal, it is necessary to set out the facts in detail hereinbelow.3. The appellants herein were the writ petitioners whereas the respondents herein were the respondents in the writ petition out of which this appeal arises.4. Respondent no.1 is a statutory authority created under the Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority Act, 1976 (for short called MHADA Act). It is known as Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board (for short Board...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1550 OF2010Dahisar Saraswati Coop. Housing Society Ltd. ... Appellant(s) Versus State of Maharashtra & Others ... Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 27.7.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Application No.241 of 2008 whereby the said application filed by the appellant was dismissed. 1 2. Brief facts of the case lie in a narrow compass as would be clear from its narration infra.3. The appellant hereina housing cooperative society was the complainant. They filed a complaint under the provisions of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (for short called the Act) against respondent nos. 2 to 6 in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate 26th Court Borivali Mumbai being Complainant Case No.429/55/04 seeking prosecution of respondent nos. 2 to 6 for allegedly committing several violations of the provis...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL No.10577 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) No.16836 of 2018) THE INCOME TAX OFFICER APPELLANT(S) VERSUS URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10578 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) No.16837 of 2018) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) APPELLANT(S) VERSUS URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST KOTA RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10579 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) No.16838 of 2018) INCOME TAX OFFICER APPELLANT(S) URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST KOTA RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10580 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) No.16839 of 2018) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPELLANT(S) VERSUS URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST THROUGH DIRECTOR RESPONDENT(S) 1 WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10581 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) No.18076 of 2018) THE INCOME TAX OFFICER APPELLANT(S) VERSUS URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10584 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) No.23293 of 2018) INCOME TAX OFFICER ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.90519052 OF2018(arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 42754276 of 2017) OM PRAKASH AGARWAL SINCE DECEASED THR. LRS. & ORS. ... APPELLANT(S) VISHAN DAYAL RAJPOOT & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.These appeals have been filed by the appellant(landlord), questioning the judgment of Allahabad High Court in Small Causes Court Revision filed by the respondents(tenant) challenging the decree of eviction passed by Additional District Judge, Firozabad. The issue which has arisen in these appeals pertains to the jurisdiction of Court of Additional District Judge in deciding Small Causes Suit on 22.10.2016. 2 2. The facts necessary to be noticed for deciding these appeals are: The appellant, the landlord of premises in question filed Judge Small Causes Suit No.1 of 2008 in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Small Cause Court, Firozabad praying for decree of eviction, rent and damages. B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS._1281-82 _OF2018(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CRL.) NOS. 7040-7041 OF2014 Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives Appellants Versus State of Karnataka & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.1. Leave granted.2. The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society. Yet, it has made great progress over the years. It is our evolving and developing jurisprudence that has made this possible. But we still have a long way to go to bring the rights of victims of crime to the centre stage and to recognise them as human rights and an important component of social justice and the rule of law. Crl. Appeal Nos._______/2018 (@ S.L.P. (Crl.) Nos. 7040-7041 of 2014) 2 3. The travails and tribulations of victims of crime begin with the trauma of the crime itself and, unfortunately, contin...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1058889 OF2018(@ SLP (C) NO(S).1235912360 OF2018 SEBASTIANI LAKRA & ORS. . APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta J.Leave granted.2. These appeals filed by the claimantsappellants are directed against the judgment dated 21.12.2017 delivered by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack whereby compensation of 2 Rs.40,90,000/ awarded by the IInd Addl. District Judge cumVth Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Rourkela (hereinafter referred to as the MACT) has been reduced to Rs.36,00,000/.3. The MACT found that the revised basic pay of the deceased was Rs.51,328/ and he was entitled to DA of Rs.7,237/ at the time of his death i.e. he was getting a total salary of Rs.58,565/. However, the MACT, for the purposes of compensation, assessed the monthly income of deceased at Rs.50,000/ per month and deducted 1/3 for his personal expenses leaving a datum figu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S)._10560-10564_OF2018[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NOS. 9320-9324 OF2015 M/S. TVS MOTOR COMPANY LTD. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No._10566__OF2018[ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.9325 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL No._10567_OF2018[ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.10579 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL No._10565_OF2018[ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.9326 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL No.10568_OF2018[ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.25434 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL No.10576__OF2018[@ SLP(C) No.28105 OF2018 [@SLP(C)..CC No.14354 OF2016 AND CIVIL APPEAL No._10569_OF2018[@SLP(C) No.2905 OF2018 JUDGMENT Civil Appeal Nos.__/2018 [@SLP(C) Nos. 9320-9324 of 2015]. a/w connected matters Page 1 of 46 A.K.SIKRI, J.Leave granted.2. This group of eleven appeals was heard together and is being disposed of by this common judgment as identical issues are involved in all these appeals.3. At the outset, the issues involve...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1041210413 OF2018(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C)NOS.3611236113 OF2013 ALD AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD. ... APPELLANT VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER NOW UPGRADED AS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) & ORS. WITH ... RESPONDENTS Civil Appeal Nos. 1041410450 of 2018 @ SLP(C) NOS.3659036626 OF2013 Civil Appeal Nos. 1045110455 of 2018 @ SLP(C)NOS.24742478 OF2014 Civil Appeal Nos. 1049810499 of 2018 @ SLP(C)NOS.1006010061 OF2014 Civil Appeal Nos. 1045610481 of 2018 @ SLP(C) Nos. 36753700 of 2014, Civil Appeal Nos.1048210497 of 2018 @ SLP(C) NOS.37023717 OF2014 Civil Appeal Nos. 1050910513 of 2018 @ SLP(C)NOS.1131311317 OF2014 Civil Appeal Nos. 1050310507 of 2018 @ SLP(C)NOS.1131911323 OF2014 Civil Appeal No.10523 of 2018 @ SLP(C)NO.13961 OF2014 Civil Appeal Nos. 1052510527 of 2018 @ SLP(C)NOS. 1320413206 OF2014 Civil Appeal No.10544 of 2018 @ SLP(C)NO.30638 OF2014 Civil Appeal No.10522 of 2018 @ SLP(C)NO.13960 OF2014 Ci...
Tag this Judgment!