Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.883 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(c) No.14306 of 2015) Jayaprakash & Anr. .Appellant(s) VERSUS T.S. David & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This appeal is filed by the plaintiffs against the final judgment and order dated 05.11.2014 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in R.F.A. No.541 of 2007 whereby the High Court allowed the 1 appeal filed by defendant Nos. 3 & 4 (respondent Nos.1 & 2 herein) and set aside the judgment and decree dated 20.02.2007 passed by the sub-Court, Kottayam in O.S. No.337 of 2001.3. In order to appreciate the short controversy involved in the appeal, few relevant facts need mention hereinbelow.4. The appellants are the plaintiffs whereas the respondents are the defendants in the civil suit out of which this appeal arises.5. The appellants filed a civil suit being O.S. No.337/2001 against the respondents (defendants) in the Co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 873-874 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.30923-30924 of 2016) MAYA DEVI (D) THROUGH LRs & ORS. Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. ...Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted 2. These appeals arise out of the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in and by which the High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.2,19,413/- per acre and also dismissed the review holding that the subsequent evidence sought to be brought is not relevant as it is based upon post notification.3. Respondent No.2-Haryana State Ware Housing Corporation had acquired 40 kanal and 8 marlas land at Rania for construction of warehouse/godown vide Notification dated 12.02.1988 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'); out Page No.1 of 10 of which 40 kanal 8 marlas land, 21 kanal 6 marlas land was of the present appellants; Notification dated 21.02.1989 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.882 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(c) No.9651 of 2017) N.C. Bansal .Appellant(s) VERSUS Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation & Anr. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1)2) Leave granted. This appeal is filed by the plaintiff against the final judgment and order dated 19.12.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in CM(M) No.1223 of 2016 whereby the High Court dismissed 1 the petition and upheld the order of the Trial Court dated 21.09.2016 in Civil Suit No.7930 of 2016.3) In order to decide the short question, it is not necessary to set out the facts in detail and mentioning of the few facts alone would suffice.4) The controversy involved in the appeal is whether the two Courts below were justified in dismissing the three applications filed by the plaintiff in a pending suit, namely, (i) application under Order 7 Rule 14 of the Code for filing of documents, (ii) application under ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.885 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.15476 of 2016) Surender Singh .Appellant(s) State of Haryana & Ors. VERSUS WITH .Respondent(s) CIVIL APPEAL NO.890 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.18631 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL NO.896 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.19204 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL No.888 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.18594 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL No.889 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.18534 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL No.886 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.15541 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL NO.887 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.38745 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 897-900 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 19859-19862 of 2016) 1 CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 909-912 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 38735-38738 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL NO.904 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.19955 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 891-895 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos. 38746-38750 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 901-903 OF2018(Ari...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICITON CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 624/2016 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH APPELLANT(s) VERSUS NANDE @ NANDKISHORE SINGH RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT N.V. RAMANA, J.This appeal by special leave arises out of a judgment dated 22 nd April, 2009 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior, passed in Criminal Appeal No.349 of 2002. By the said judgment, the High Court reversed the order of conviction against the respondent herein for the offences punishable under Section 304, Part I and 307, IPC passed by the learned trial Court, and acquitted him of the charges.2. According to the prosecution, on 1st June, 1994 at about 9.30 p.m. Rajendra Pathak (PW12, the SHO of P.S. Singhonia on receiving a telephone call from Khariyahar hospital that some women belonging to the village Kotla Ka Pura were admitted in the hospital 2 with serious burn injuries, rushed to the hospital and conducted inquiry. In the investigation, it was reveale...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.824 OF2018(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.19771 OF2017 M/S INDIAN FARMERS FERTILIZER CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED APPELLANT VERSUS M/S BHADRA PRODUCTS ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. 2. Leave granted. An interesting question arises as to whether an award delivered by an Arbitrator, which decides the issue of limitation, can be said to be an interim award, and whether such interim award can then be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 1 The brief facts necessary to dispose of the present appeal are as follows.3. The appellant before us issued a tender enquiry to 19 parties, including the respondent, for supply of Defoamers. The respondent submitted its bid, pursuant to which a Letter of Intent dated 2nd November, 2006 was issued to the respondent for supply of 800 Metric Tonnes of Defoamers to be used for production of 3,08,880 Metr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.165 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.9571 of 2012) ISSAC @ KISHOR .....Appellant Versus RONALD CHERIYAN AND ORS. ....Respondents ORDER R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 25.07.2012 passed by Kerala High Court at Ernakulam allowing Criminal Revision Petition No.3413 of 2008 preferred by respondent no.1 herein thereby setting aside the acquittal of the appellant-accused no.1 for the offences punishable under Section 302 IPC and Section 394 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and further remitting the matter back to the trial Court for retrial.3. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is that, the deceased-Brijitha was sixty three years old widow and used to stay Page No.1 of 11 alone in her house which was situated in five acres of agricultural land. Natarajan, father of accused no.1 used to stay in the same house where Brijitha was staying. He was a permanent emp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.197-198 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos. 10077-78 of 2015) DASHRATH @ JOLO & ANR. ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondent(s) R. BANUMATHI ORDER Leave granted. These appeals arise out of the judgment dated 2. 13.05.2014 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissing the criminal appeal Nos.598-99/2009 thereby confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is that, on 3. 03.08.2008 at about 1.30 p.m., PW-19-Birichram went to the house of one Bhojram for inviting him for the sixth day birth of his child (chhati). The appellants who are neighbours of Bhojram and were standing in front of their houses, threatened PW-19 that they will kill him. When PW-19 asked the appellants not to abuse, appellant Dashrath @ Jolo who was having battleaxe alongwith one Phodol @ Duryodhan (since dead) who was also having battleaxe and on...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.161 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.3168/2017) LACHHMAN DASS APPELLANT (S) RESHAM CHAND KALER AND ANR. RESPONDENT (S) VERSUS With Criminal Appeal No.162 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.3167/2017) LACHHMAN DASS APPELLANT (S) MOHINDER PAL CLAIR & ANR. RESPONDENT (S) VERSUS Criminal Appeal No.163 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.3169/2017) LACHHMAN DASS APPELLANT (S) SUKHWINDER SINGH & ANR. RESPONDENT (S) VERSUS JUDGMENT N . V . R A M A N A , J . 2 Criminal Appeal No.161 of 2018 @ SLP (Crl.) No.3168 of 2017 1. Leave granted.2. This case arises out of an order dated 19.01.2017, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh, in CRM-M-36539/2016, wherein the High Court has granted regular bail to the respondent no.1 in FIR2052015, dated 05.11.2015, filed under Sections 302, 307, 324, 148 & 149 of Indian Penal Code of 1860 [hereinafter IPC for brevity]. and Sections 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE CORRECTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION M.A. NOS.1795-1796 OF2017IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS.17869-17870 OF2017ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD APPELLANTS VERSUS RABI SANKAR PATRO & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS WITH Diary No(s).39667/2017 IA13880/2017 in C.A. No.17870/2017) MA18071808/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA17971798/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA17991800/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18011802/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18031804/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18051806/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18641865/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18661867/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18701871/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18681869/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18721873/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA1112/2018 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18741875/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 MA18761877/2017 in C.A. No.17869-17870/2017 Diary No(s). 42444/2017 IA4872018 in C.A. No.17870/2017) MA56/2018 in C.A. No.17869-1787...
Tag this Judgment!