Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.496 OF2007JAYKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR VERSUS .......APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.498 of 2007 POPCORN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER ........APPELLANT(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) CIVIL APPEAL No.18489 of 2017 (arising out of SLP (C) No.33322 OF2011 POPCORN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. AND ANOTHER VERSUS ........APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) CIVIL APPEAL No.18492 of 2017 (arising out of SLP (C) No.30293 OF2017 JAYKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD. ........APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) VERSUS1JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted in both Special Leave Petitions.2. The present batch of appeals, between the same parties, arise from a controversy relating to auction settlement by the Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board (hereinaft...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.496 OF2007JAYKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR VERSUS .......APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.498 of 2007 POPCORN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER ........APPELLANT(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) CIVIL APPEAL No.18489 of 2017 (arising out of SLP (C) No.33322 OF2011 POPCORN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. AND ANOTHER VERSUS ........APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) CIVIL APPEAL No.18492 of 2017 (arising out of SLP (C) No.30293 OF2017 JAYKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD. ........APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) VERSUS1JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted in both Special Leave Petitions.2. The present batch of appeals, between the same parties, arise from a controversy relating to auction settlement by the Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board (hereinaft...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.496 OF2007JAYKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR VERSUS .......APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.498 of 2007 POPCORN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER ........APPELLANT(s) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) CIVIL APPEAL No.18489 of 2017 (arising out of SLP (C) No.33322 OF2011 POPCORN PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD. AND ANOTHER VERSUS ........APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) CIVIL APPEAL No.18492 of 2017 (arising out of SLP (C) No.30293 OF2017 JAYKRISHNA INDUSTRIES LTD. ........APPELLANT(s) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS.....RESPONDENT(s) VERSUS1JUDGMENT NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted in both Special Leave Petitions.2. The present batch of appeals, between the same parties, arise from a controversy relating to auction settlement by the Mumbai Housing and Area Development Board (hereinaft...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.27333/2015) Prasadi Devi VERSUS ...Appellant(s) Nagar Palika Sawai Madhopur, (Now Nagar Parishad) Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1)2) Leave granted. This appeal is filed by the plaintiff against the final judgment and order dated 16.04.2015 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4592 of 2014 whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant herein and affirmed the order of the Trial Court. 13) It may not be necessary to set out the entire facts for the disposal of the appeal in detail except to state those facts, which are necessary to appreciate the short issue raised in the appeal. This is because the learned counsel for the appellant (plaintiff) has made a statement at the Bar, which we are inclined to accept. Learned counsel for the respondent(defendant) has no objection to the state...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.18612 OF2017[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 26140 OF2013 SHIVANG MATHUR Appellant (s) VERSUS SOHAN LAL & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.Leave granted.1. In a petition under Article 226 of the 2. Constitution of India, the High Court passed the following cryptic order :- ....... In this matter, learned court below has pleased to allow the order of amendment and such order is also discretionary. This Court in exercise of power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India will not interfere same. Accordingly, the same is dismissed summarily..... with the 3. The issue pertains to the steps taken for amendment of a plaint. The trial court partly allowed it and in revision, the amendment was wholly allowed. The petition under Article 227 of the 2 Constitution was disposed of by the short Judgment referred to above.4. Without going into the merits of the matter, the learned counsel on both ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.1651 of 2015) State of Uttarakhand ..Appellant(s) VERSUS Jairnail Singh .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) Leave granted.2) This appeal is filed by the State against the final judgment and order dated 22.05.2014 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Criminal Appeal No.33 of 2005 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal filed by the respondent(accused) herein and set aside the order of conviction and sentence dated 01.03.2005 passed by the Trial Court in Session Trial Nos.319 & 320 of 2000 by which the respondent(accused) was convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and Section 25(1-A) of 1 the Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and a fine of Rs.5000/- under Section 307 of IPC, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo impr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2306-2307 OF2017SAGAR PANDURANG DHUNDARE . APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KESHAV AABA PATIL AND OTHERS . RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 5132-5133 OF2017JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. The crucial question to be decided is whether a family member of the original encroacher can be disqualified, under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (for short the Act). The enabling provision, as introduced by an amendment in 2006, reads as follows:14.Disqualifications.-(1) No person shall be a member of a Panchayat, or continue as such, who xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx (j-3) has encroached upon the Government land or public property; or 2.3. 2 On the undisputed facts of these cases, there is no allegation that the appellants are encroachers themselves, in the sense that they themselves first encroached upon the Government property and they continue to occupy the same. The allegation is that their father/grandfather a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.18619 OF2017[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.31117 OF2017 [ DIARY No.11875 OF2017 STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS BHAGTA (D) THROUGH LRS & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.18618 OF2017[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.31120 OF2017 [ DIARY No.11555 OF2017 JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. The appellants are before this Court with certain grievances regarding the compensation awarded by the court in land acquisition proceedings. A batch of similar appeals came up before this Court, i.e. Civil Appeal Nos. 1949-1966 of 2016 & connected matters, when this Court passed the following Judgment :-1. All these appeals are filed by the State, aggrieved by the compensation awarded for the lands acquired for the purpose of construction of Ranjit Sagar Dam Project vide Notification dated 07.08.1995 under Section 4(1) of the 2 Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisiti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.17535 OF2017UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MAJ.GEN. MANOMOY GANGULY, VSM .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.Respondent herein belongs to the Army Medical Corps. He is the Major General and aspires to become Lieutenant General (Lt. Gen.), which is next higher rank in his cadre. First Special Promotion Board (SPB), for this purpose was held on 20th January, 2016 but he was not empanelled to the rank of Lt. Gen. by the said Board. His statutory complaint there against was partially redressed whereby an assessment of the Technical Officer (TO) in his Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of 2014 was expunged. This entitled him to fresh screening by Review SPB which held its meeting on 21st March, 2017. However, even Civil Appeal No.17535 of 2017 Page 1 of 17 Review SPB did not empanel him for the promotional rank. After exhausting departmental remedies in the form of statutory compla...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2781-2790 OF2010M/S. SRD NUTRIENTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE GUWAHATI .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.812 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1730-1731 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL No.5173 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4611 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NO.4596 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.2987 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.5175 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.2988 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3981-3983 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2651-2660 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL No.8322 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8323-8324 OF2010Civil Appeal Nos. 2781-2790 of 2010 & Ors. Page 1 of 30 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5927-5929 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3735-3750 OF2011CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5022-5023 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.4597 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4598 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4599 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4600 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4601 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4602 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4603 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4604 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4605 OF2010CIVIL APPEAL No.4...
Tag this Judgment!