Skip to content


Supreme Court of India Court December 2016 Judgments Home Cases Supreme Court of India 2016 Page 1 of about 71 results (0.037 seconds)

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

Chief Controller, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Co, Ltd. Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. NOS.9-10/2016 IN & CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4859-4860/2015 CHIEF CONTROLLER, TAMIL NADU GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS T.T. INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)/ APPLICANT(S) JUDGMENT1 It is not in dispute that the appeals on identical issues have been dismissed maintaining the award of simple interest @ 10% per annum on the amount outstanding against the appellant, as ordered by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity.2. Therefore, these appeals are also dismissed.3. The I.As stand disposed of. .......................J.[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]. .......................J.[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]. NEW DELHI; DECEMBER16 2016....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Kanta Bahri and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.12247 OF2016[ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.37154 OF2016 [ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC. NO.15525 OF2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS KANTA BAHRI & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No.5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.21545 of 2015.4. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.5. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.6. We make it clear tha...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Lajinder Singh and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.12248 OF2016[ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.37156 OF2016 [ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC. NO.24058 OF2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS LAJINDER SINGH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.12249 OF2016[ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.37157 OF2016 [ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC. No.24539 OF2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SANJAY AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No.5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.21545 of 2015.4. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.5. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, the appellant is given a period of one year t...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Ajay Singh and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.12239 OF2016[ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.37153 OF2016 [ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC. NO.24113 OF2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS AJAY SINGH AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No.5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.21545 of 2015.4. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.5. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.6. We make it clear th...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

Sarvani and Ors. Vs. Municipal Board, Navalgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.12257 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.1827 OF2015]. SARVANI AND ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS MUNICIPAL BOARD, NAVALGARH Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case and considering that the husband of Appellant No.1 died while in service, we are of the view that interest of justice would be met if one time compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs) is given in full and final settlement of all the claims in respect of the service rendered by the late husband of the first appellant. Ordered accordingly.3. The amount, as above, shall be paid within a period of four weeks from today.4. With the above observations and directions, the appeal is disposed of.5. It is made clear that in case the amount, as above, is not paid within the stipulated time, Appellant No.1 shall be entitled to interest at the rate of 18% from th...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

C.I.T and Anr Vs. M/S Yokogawa India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8498 OF2013C.I.T. & ANR. APPELLANT(s) VERSUS M/S YOKOGAWA INDIA LTD. RESPONDENT(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 8496/2013, 8497/2013, 8502/2013, 8508/2013, 8511/2013, 8512/2013, 8514/2013, 8516/2013, 8517/2013, 8520/2013, 8925/2013, 8926/2013, 8928/2013, 8788/2012, 8790/2012, 8534/2013, 8563/2013, 8564/2013, 8923/2013, 8924/2013, 8930/2013, 8931/2013, 8232/2015, 9253/2015, CIVIL APPEAL No.12253/2016 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.36441/2013), CIVIL APPEAL No.12252/2016 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.36442/2013), CIVIL APPEAL No.12205/2016 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.977/2014), CIVIL APPEAL No.12207/2016 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.2328/2014), CIVIL APPEAL No.12250/2016 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.10261/2014), CIVIL APPEAL No.12254/2016 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.8391/2015), CIVIL APPEAL No.12206/2016 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.13840/2015), CIVIL APPEAL No.12251/2016 (arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.18157/201...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

Lalita Ramesh Lase and Ors. Vs. Jairaj Kantilal Sonawala and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION S.L.P. (CIVIL) No.10706 OF2014LALITA RAMESH LASE & ORS. ....PETITIONERS VERSUS JAIRAJ KANTILAL SONAWALA & ORS. .RESPONDENTS WITH SLP(C) No.24080/2014 SLP(C) No.22322/2015 SLP(C) No.23092/2014 SLP(C) No.28382/2014 SLP(C) No.18491/2014 SLP(C) No.594/2015 SLP(C) No.28380/2014 SLP(C) No.22327/2015 SLP(C) No.22329/2015 SLP(C) No.28367/2014 SLP(C) No.28324/2014 SLP(C) No.18495/2014 SLP(C) No.18033/2015 SLP(C) No.36132/2014 SLP(C) No.22328/2015 S.L.P.(C)...CC No.11227/2014 SLP(C) No.28393/2014 SLP(C) No.28363/2014 SLP(C) No.21992/2015 SLP(C) No.28417/2014 SLP(C) No.632/2015 SLP(C) D. No.10476/2015 SLP(C) No.23099/2014 SLP(C) No.28391/2014 SLP(C) No.28396/2014 SLP(C) No.22315/2015 SLP(C) No.28316/2014 SLP(C) No.18490/2014 SLP(C) No.28381/2014 SLP(C) No.22332/2015 SLP(C) D. No.22563/2015 SLP(C) No.22326/2015 SLP(C) No.18492/2014 SLP(C) D. No.22559/2015 SLP(C) D No.1206/2014 JUDGMENT AMITAVA ROY, J.1. Delay condoned.2. The pro...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

State Bank of India Vs. Santosh Gupta and Anr. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12237-12238_OF2016[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS.30884-30885 OF2015 STATE BANK OF INDIA APPELLANT VERSUS SANTOSH GUPTA AND ANR. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12240-12246_OF2016[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS.30810-30815 & 30817 OF2015 [SLP (CIVIL) NOS.30810-30817 OF2015 STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS ZAFFAR ULLAH NEHRU AND ANR. ETC. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.Leave granted.1. The Constitution of India is a mosaic drawn from the experience of nations worldwide. The federal structure of this Constitution is largely reflected in Part XI which is largely drawn from the Government of India Act, 1935. The State of Jammu & Kashmir is a part of this federal structure. Due to historical reasons, it is a State which is accorded special treatment within the framework of the Constitution of India. This case is all about the State of Jammu & Kashmir vis`-a-vis` the Union ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.906/2016 Vivek Narayan Sharma Petitioner(s) Vs. Union of India Respondent(s) WITH W.P.(C) Nos.908/2016,913/2016,916/2016, WP D.No.37946/2016, W.P.(C) No.929/2016, W.P.(C)No.930/2016, 943/2016,W.P.(Crl.) No.162/2016, W.P.(C) No.951/2016,952/2016,953/2016,954/2016,958/2016,957/2016,T.P.(C)No.2018- 2022/2016,W.P.(C)No.971/2016,972/2016, SLP No.35356/2016, T.P.(C)No.2030- 2038/2016, W.P.(C)No.978/2016, W.P.(C)D.No.40114/2016,W.P.(C) No.944/2016, SLPNo.35805/2016,W.P.(C)No.996/2016,997/2016, T.P.(C)No.1958-1967/2016 & T.P.(C)No.1982-1996/2016, W.P.(C) Nos. 1006/2016, 1008/2016, 1009/2016, 1010/2016, 1011/2016 and SLP(C) No.36757/2016 ORDER Writ Petitions are admitted. Issue notice on the Writ Petitions, special leave petitions and other applications. The respondents may file reply affidavit within six weeks. Rejoinder, if any, within three weeks thereafter. We have heard the lear...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2016 (SC)

Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Vs. Gtl Infra. Ltd. and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5360-5363 OF2013AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION APPELLANT(s) VERSUS GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENT(s) WITH C.A. No.5364/2013, C.A. No.5365/2013, C.A. Nos. 6385-6387/2013, C.A. Nos. 6737-6738/2013, C.A. No.6739/2013, C.A. Nos. 6836-6926/2013, C.A. Nos. 7865-7894/2013, C.A. No.8114/2013, C.A. No.8115/2013, C.A. No.8116/2013, C.A. No.8117/2013, C.A. No.12209/2016 @ SLP(C) No.362/2014, C.A. Nos. 2854-2855/2014, C.A. No.12211/2016 (arising out of SLP(C) No.12567/2014), C.A. No.12212/2016 (arising out of SLP(C) No.21521/2014), C.A. No.12213/2016 (arising out of SLP(C) No.22653/2014), C.A. Nos. 12214-12215/2016 (arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 29803- 29804/2014), C.A. No.12216/2016 (arising out of SLP(C) No.29765/2014), C.A. No.12217/2016 (arising out of SLP(C) No.31442/2014), C.A. No.12218/2016 (arising out of SLP(C) No.31986/2014), C.A. No.12220/2016 (arising out of SLP(C) No.24053/2014), C.A. ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //