Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10431 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.32179 OF2016]. [ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC. No.19459 OF2016]. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s) VERSUS NAFE SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No.5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.21545 of 2015.4. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.5. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.6. We make it clear that in case no fresh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10432 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C) No.4254 of 2016) PREM CHAND SHARMA APPELLANT VERSUS SHIV PRASAD AND ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1 Leave granted.2. At the time of issuing notice in the matter, having regard to the nature of disputes between two real brothers, a suggestion was made by the Court that the possibility of an amicable settlement of the disputes could be explored between the parties. 3 It is heartening to note that in the process the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre and the Settlement Agreement dated 12.05.2016 has also been drawn up. The parties, their counsel and Shri K.D.Singh, learned Mediator, Supreme Court of India have duly signed the deed. We record our appreciation for the efforts taken by the Mediator and for the cooperation given by the parties and their learned counsel.-. 2 - 4 The appeal is disposed of in ter...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 10418-10419 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P (C) Nos.30067-30068 of 2013) Pratap Singh Yadav Appellant Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority & Anr. Respondents JUDGMENT T.S. THAKUR, CJI.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals call in question the correctness of orders dated 25th September, 2012 and 26th November, 2012 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (for short, the National Commission) whereby the Commission has dismissed Revision Petition No.186 of 2011 and Review Application No.191 of 2012 in the process affirming order dated 4th October, 2010 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana (for short, the State Commission). The State Commission had in turn while setting aside the order passed by the District Forum declared that since the appellant had voluntarily surrendered the disputed plot of land and accepted the refund amount, he had cea...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 988-989 OF2016[ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CRL.) NOS.6226-27 OF2016 SHYAM PAL .APPELLANT VERSUS DAYAWATI BESOYA & ANR. ....RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT AMITAVA ROY, J.The instant appeals call in question the judgment and order dated 08.02.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Criminal Revision Petition No.403 of 2015, sustaining the conviction of the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1988 (hereafter referred to as the Act) as recorded by the Trial Court and affirmed in appeal by the District and Sessions Judge, Saket Court, New Delhi. The High Court while maintaining the substantive sentence of simple imprisonment for 10 months and fine of Rs.6,50,000/- as compensation as awarded by the Trial Court, however has reduced the default sentence from six months simple imprisonment to that of three months. The order dated 22.02.2016 rendered by the High Court declining the prayer ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2649 of 2016 SRI MAIREMBAM PRITHVIRAJ @ PRITHVIRAJ SINGH .... Appellant(s) Versus SHRI PUKHREM SHARATCHANDRA SINGH .Respondent(s) With CIVIL APPEAL No.2829 of 2016 PUKHREM SHARATCHANDRA SINGH .... Appellant(s) Versus SRI MAIREMBAM PRITHVIRAJ @ PRITHVIRAJ SINGH .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.CIVIL APPEAL No.2649 of 2016 The Appellant has filed this appeal aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court of Manipur at Imphal by which his election to the Manipur Legislative Assembly from Moirang Assembly constituency was declared as void. A Notification was issued for election to the 10th Manipur Legislative Assembly on 04.01.2012. The Appellant belonging to the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and the Respondent who was sponsored by the Indian National Congress (INC) filed their nominations within the time prescribed. There was no other nomination filed. The Respondent objected to the nomination...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10413 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.32064 OF2016]. [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC No.20164 OF2016]. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s) VERSUS AMAN & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10414 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.32065 OF2016]. [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC No.20437 OF2016]. WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10415 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.32066 OF2016]. [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC No.20526 OF2016]. WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10416 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.32067 OF2016]. [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C)......CC No.20649 OF2016]. JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No.5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.21545 of 2015...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.10353 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C) No.14912 of 2011) NAVJOT SINGH SIDHU ...APPELLANT VERSUS OM PARKASH SONI & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI,J1 Leave granted.2. The appellant before this Court is the returned candidate in the election held on 13th May, 2009 for the 02-Amritsar Parliamentary Constituency. The election was challenged in E.P. No.3 of 2009 before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The appellant, as the respondent in the Election Petition, had filed an application under Order VI rule 16 and Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for dismissal of the election petition contending that on account of deficiencies in the pleadings no triable issue(s) is disclosed to justify a regular trial of the allegations made. According to the appellant the election petition, in its entirety, had failed to disclose any cause of action whatsoever. Though some reli...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4283-4284 OF2013KAIL Ltd. (Formerly Kitchen Appliances India Ltd.) .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Kerala Represented thrgh. Jt. Commr. (Law) .... Respondent(s) JUDGMENT R.K. Agrawal, J.1) Challenge in the above said appeals is to the legality of the impugned judgments and orders dated 25.05.2010 and 16.08.2011 in ST REV No.36 of 2007 and RP No.337 of 2011 respectively rendered by a Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam.2) Factual position in a nutshell is as follows:- a) The above said appeals relate to the assessment under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (in short the KGST Act) for the year 1999-2000. KAIL Ltd.-the appellant-Company is a dealer in home appliances at Ernakulam having registered office at Bangalore. b) The issue is with regard to the tax under Section 5(2) of the KGST Act on sales turnover of home appliances for Rs. 27,27,20,230/- on the ground that the ap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6673 OF2014Satya Pal Anand Appellant Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. ..Respondents JUDGMENT A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.This appeal has been placed before a three Judges Bench in terms of order dated August 25, 2015, consequent to the difference of opinion between the two learned Judges of the Division Bench.2. Justice Dipak Misra took the view that, in the fact situation of the present case the Writ Petition filed by the appellant challenging the order passed by the Sub-Registrar (Registration) and the Inspector General (Registration) was rightly dismissed by the High Court. However, His Lordship opined that a question would still arise for consideration, namely, whether in absence of any specific Rule in the State of Madhya Pradesh, the general principle laid down in the case of Thota Ganga Laxmi & Anr. vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.[1]. would be applicable?.3. Justice V.Gopala Gowda on the other hand allow...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.213 OF2013State of Punjab & Ors. Appellants Versus Jagjit Singh & Ors. Respondents WITH |CIVIL APPEAL No.10356 OF2016|CIVIL APPEAL No.236 OF2013| |(Arising out of SLP (CIVIL).31676 CC No.15616| | |OF2011 | | |CIVIL APPEAL NO.10357 OF2016|CIVIL APPEAL No.245 OF2013| |(Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) 31677 CC No.16434| | |OF2011 | | |CIVIL APPEAL NO.10358 OF2016|CIVIL APPEAL No.246 OF2013| |(Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) No.37162 OF2012| | |CIVIL APPEAL No.10360 OF2016|CIVIL APPEAL No.247 OF2013| |(Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) No.37164 OF2012| | |CIVIL APPEAL NO.10361 OF2016|CIVIL APPEAL No.248 OF2013| |(Arising out of SLP (CIVIL) No.37165 OF2012| | |CIVIL APPEAL No.211 OF2013|CIVIL APPEAL No.249 OF2013| |CIVIL APPEAL No.212 OF2013|CIVIL APPEAL No.257 OF2013| |CIVIL APPEAL No.214 OF2013|CIVIL APPEAL No.260 OF2013| |CIVIL APPEAL No.217 OF2013|CIVIL APPEAL No.262 OF2013| |CIVIL APPEAL No.218 OF2013|CIVIL APPEAL N...
Tag this Judgment!