Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.46 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.7437 of 2013) NANKAUNOO .Appellant Versus STATE OF U.P. ...Respondent JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 16.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in Criminal Appeal No.775 of 1981, whereby the High Court affirmed the conviction of the appellant-accused under Section 302 IPC and also sentence of imprisonment for life imposed on him.3. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is as under:- Deceased-Chhedi Lal was running a barber shop in Kurari Khurd Market. On 18.02.1981, the appellant visited the shop of Chhedi Lal and asked for a haircut. An altercation took place between the two when appellant insisted the deceased for haircut claiming preference over other customers; but the deceased- Chhedi Lal declined his demand. The appellant felt insulted and left the barber shop ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.49/2016 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.10404 of 2014) Parveen Appellant Versus The State of Haryana . Respondent ORDER Uday Umesh Lalit J.Leave granted. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 21.12.2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana in Crl. Appeal No.S-1793-SB of 2011 confirming the conviction and sentence of the appellant and one Jaswant under Sections 398 and 401 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act. On 18.12.2014 this Court was pleased to issue notice limited to the question of sentence. According to the prosecution, the police had received specific information that the appellant and one Jaswant were planning to loot passing vehicles near Agma Gas Agency Store situated in Sector 21D, Faridabad. This information was received on 09.02.2009 after 9:30 p.m. PW2 Ishwar Singh, ASI was already present in Sector 21D, Faridabad on patrol duty. On receip...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.361 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C) No.10951 of 2014) M/s Metal Seam Co. of India (P) Ltd. Appellant Vs. M/s Avadh Delicacies & Others Respondents JUDGMENT Uday U. Lalit, J.Leave granted. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 28.03.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in Writ Petition No.1840 of 1998 whereby the High Court was pleased to set-aside the orders dated 09.06.1998 and 15.06.1998 passed by the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Lucknow. The facts in the present matter are as under:- In 1956, Shed No.B-5 inclusive of appurtenant open space situated in Talkatora Industrial Estate, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the concerned shed) was allotted to M/s Surya Chemicals for establishment of a factory. Under the Hire Purchase agreement entered into between M/s Surya Chemicals and the Director of Industries on behalf of the G...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.45 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.9344 of 2014) BOBBILI RAMAKRISHNA RAJU YADAV & ORS. .Appellants Versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P. HYDERABAD, A.P. & ANR. ...Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. The present appeal assails the order dated 23.07.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No.1778 of 2010, whereby the High Court declined to quash the proceedings against appellants No.1 to 6 in C.C. No.532 of 2009 under Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 pending before Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vizianagaram.3. Brief facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as follows:- First appellant is working as an Engineer in G.E. India Technology Company at Bangalore. Appellants No.2 and 3 are the parents, appellant No.4 is widowed sister and appellants No.5 and 6 are the sister...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.354 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.7553 of 2008) State of Haryana Appellant Versus Eros City Developers Pvt. Ltd. and others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.355 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C) No.27588 of 2008) JUDGMENT Prafulla C. Pant, J.Leave granted in both the special leave petitions. These appeals are directed against judgment and order dated 21.01.2008, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Civil Writ Petition No.10611 of 2004 whereby said Court has quashed the notifications dated 08.10.2003 and 07.05.2004 issued under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, respectively, by the State of Haryana regarding acquisition of land measuring 129 kanals 14 marlas in village Lakarpur, District Faridabad. The High Court has further quashed the Award dated 05.05.2006, passed by respondent No.4 in respect of land owned by respondent No.1 Eros City Developers Pvt. Ltd., which was acquired thro...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.50 of 2016 (Arising from the SLP(Crl.) No.2082 of 2015) Surender @ Kala . Appellant Versus State of Haryana . Respondent JUDGMENT Uday U. Lalit, J.Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.12.2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing Criminal Appeal No.S-318-SB of 2004 preferred by the appellant against his conviction under Section 18 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for being in possession of 1 kg of opium without any permit or licence. According to the prosecution PW6 SI Satbir Singh was on usual patrol duty on 24.06.2002 along with other police officials at bus stand of village Bichpar, Distt Sonipat. Secret information was received by him that the appellant was selling opium and was roaming in the village in search of customers. This information was reduced to writing in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.284 OF2016(Arising out of SLP ( C) No.4639 of 2015) KASAMSHA RAMJANISHA DIWAN APPELLANT VERSUS GUJARAT STATE WAKF BOARD AND ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT KURIAN,J.Leave granted 2. The issues pertain to certain disputes with regard to the Bala Pir Trust. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is unnecessary to go into the factual matrix of the case. The learned Single Judge though was of the view that the disputes should be worked out before the Civil Court, yet remanded the matter to the Gujarat State Wakf Board. The Division Bench of the High Court as per the impugned judgment dated 01.05.2014, allowed the appeal modifying that part of the order passed by the learned Single Judge and vacated the order on remand.3. We find from the order dated 03.03.2006 in Special Civil Application No.14540 of 2004 and connected matters that the learned Single Judge had passed an interim order. The operati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.285 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.16102 OF2011 PATTABIRAM NADARGAL IYYAKIYA SANGAM & ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS N.NATESAN NADAR & ORS Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellants' main apprehension appears to be that on account of injunction granted by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Poonamallee, Tamil Nadu in the Judgment and decree dated 29.02.2008 that they may not be in a position to participate in the affairs of the society including the elections thereof of the Pattabiram Nadargal Iyyakiya Sangam.3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the other side also, we do not find any justification for the apprehension. The Trial Court only dealt with the situation prevailing as in the years 2005 to 2008. That period is over.4. It is informed that fresh elections to the Society have not been conducted so far. The Registrar of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.282 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.21956 OF2014 ARUN MANOHAR DANGE AND ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, RAIGAD, ALIBAG Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.Leave granted. The issue pertains to the determination of just compensation for the land acquired from the appellants. The dispute is in a narrow compass as to whether there should be 75% deduction for development charges. The reasons stated by the High Court in paragraph 12 of the impugned Judgment reads as follows :-"2. Now the question is what should be the deduction made for arriving at the market value of the acquired land on the basis of the market value reflected from Exhibit 32. The rate of market value reflected from Exhibit 32 is Rs. 381/- per sq. meter. The area of the acquired and is very large - 9900 sq. meters. There were no internal roads or drainage lines on the acquired land. Apart from the largene...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.283 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.7246 OF2015 SUBHASH AGARWAL & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellants approached the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in CWP No.21211 of 2014 with the following prayer :- "(a) Praying for issuance of a Writ in the Nature of Certiorari and of any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order and for quashing of the order dt. 24.06.2014 at Annexure P-18 to the extent of applicability of the 'current rates' which in the humble pleading of the petitioner are not applicable as prayed in the aforesaid pleadings. (b) Praying that the alleged acquisition proceedings u/s 6 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 may kindly be declared to have 'lapsed' & disputed land be kindly released /transferred in the name of the petitioner on the aforesaid grounds. (c) For kindly issuing a direction by holding...
Tag this Judgment!