Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6838 OF2015(Arising from S.L.P. (C) No.26751/2013) Lloyd Electric and Engineering Limited Appellant (s) Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others Respondent (s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.: Leave granted. Whether the appellant is liable to pay Central Sales Tax (hereinafter referred to as CST) @ 2 per cent on the inter-State sales for the period 01.04.2009 to 17.06.2009 or @ 1 per cent in view of the Industrial Policy of the State, is the dispute arising for consideration in this case. It is not in dispute that as per the Industrial Policy of the State of Himachal Pradesh, the appellant had been enjoying the concessional rate in CST @ 1 per cent upto 31.03.2009. It is also not in dispute that the Cabinet had taken a policy decision to extend the period of concession upto 31.03.2013 or till the CST is phased out. Still further, it is not in dispute that the Department of Industries had, accordingly, issued a notifica...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.6813-6814 OF2015(Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.16258-16259 of 2015) MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ... APPELLANT(S) VS. AKASH EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT TRUST & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) WITH Civil Appeal No.6815/2015 @ SLP(C)No.14173/2015 JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and considered the facts of the case.3. Upon perusal of the impugned judgment delivered by the High Court, we find that the High Court has given direction to the appellant-Medical Council of India to carry out inspection of the respondent-institution within a particular time.4. In our opinion, such a direction could not have been given in view of the fact that the inspection at a belated stage is against the provisions of the Medical Council of India Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999. Moreover, in view of the law laid down by this Court in Priya Gupta Vs. St...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6812 OF2015(Arising out of SLP(C)NO.14880 of 2015) MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA ... APPELLANT(S) VS. AL MILLAT FOUNDATION TRUST & ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 28th April, 2015, in W.P.(C)No.7207/2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench at Lucknow, the appellant has approached this Court.3. We have heard the learned counsel and have perused the impugned order as well as the relevant record.4. We find that the respondents had been aggrieved by an order dated 11.07.2014 passed by the appellant-Council and therefore, the said order was challenged before the High Court. The High Court has quashed the said order by virtue of the impugned order.5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-Council that the respondents' application for grant of permission had been received on 1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8224 OF2003K. NANJAPPA (Dead) BY LRs. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS R.A. HAMEED alias AMEERSAB (Dead) BY LRs. AND ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT M.Y. EQBAL, J.: Aggrieved by the judgment and orders dated 25.6.2003 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Regular First Appeal No.201 of 1992, the appellants have preferred this appeal by special leave. By impugned judgment, High Court partly allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the trial court and decreed the suit of the plaintiff-respondents herein for specific performance as well as for recovery of possession of suit items I, II and III.2. The factual background as will appear from the trial court judgment need to be highlighted and reproduced hereunder.3. The plaintiff-respondent claimed to be the son of Late P. Abdul Rahiman Sab alias Jambusab. The late Jambusab had three wives. The first wifes son was Abdul Sakoorsab, who died in the year 1967. The...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.6689-6690 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) Nos.14244-45 of 2015) Dr. Tapas Kumar Mandal and others etc. ..Appellant(s) versus State of West Bengal and others ..Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M. Y. EQBAL, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals by special leave are directed against the Judgment and order dated 17.04.2015 passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Calcutta in A.S.T. Nos. 51 & 52 of 2015 dismissing the writ petitions preferred by the appellants against the order of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal refusing to pass an interim order and fixing the matter for final hearing.3. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellants-writ petitioners, who are all Doctors serving under the Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of West Bengal, had obtained M.B.B.S. Degree and were issued Registration Certificates from the West Bengal Medical Council in different years. All of them ar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.6691-6692 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) Nos.17176-17177 of 2013) Gurdas Singh and others etc. ..Appellant(s) versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondent(s) with CIVIL APPEAL Nos.6693-6694 OF2015(Arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos.8082-8083 of 2014) Dev Raj Kashyap and another .Appellant(s) versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M. Y. EQBAL, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals by special leave are directed against the Judgment and order dated 26.3.2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in LPA Nos.76 and 78 of 2012, whereby Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeals preferred by the appellants-teachers upholding the decision of the learned Single Judge who disposed of their writ petitions with certain directions.3. The facts of the case in brief are that various writ petitions at the instance of teachers of two of the Sanskrit Institutes at ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1134-1135 OF2015[arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 6028-6029 of 2014]. |BHADRESH BIPINBHAI SHETH |.....APPELLANT(S) | |VERSUS | | |STATE OF GUJARAT & ANOTHER |.....RESPONDENT(S) | JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.Leave granted. The appellant herein, in these appeals, challenges the validity of the judgment dated 18.07.2014 passed by High Court of Judicature at Gujarat cancelling the anticipatory bail which was granted to the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.16 of Ahmedabad City Sessions Court. Before coming to the factual narrative of a long drawn event that has taken place in respect of criminal trial pending against the appellant, we would like to state, in capsiculated manner, the circumstances under which the matter has landed up in this Court. The appellant and respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred to as the 'prosecutrix') were neighbours at the relevant time and...
Tag this Judgment!