Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.697 of 2011 Chaitanya Prakash Audichya . Appellant Versus C.B.I. . Respondent JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. This appeal by Special Leave challenges the judgment and order dated 06-12-2010 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2010 by which the High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The case of the prosecution was that PW1 Chandra Shekhar Bandari was sole proprietor of M/s JCS Associates, which firm was undertaking construction work for governmental agencies. The firm was awarded two contracts in March 2003 by Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Betul, Goa and it was mandatory requirement to have a licence from the office of the Assistant Labour Commissioner, (Central) Vasco. PW1 therefore applied for requisite licence...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1035 OF2008DEPOSIT INSURANCE & CREDIT GUARANTEE CORPORATION ... APPELLANT VERSUS RAGUPATHI RAGAVAN & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1116, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, 1931, 1932, 1934 AND1935OF2009 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5333, 5334, 5335, 5336 AND53375339 OF2012 JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Judgment dated 20th November, 2006 delivered in Writ Appeal No.261 of 2006 by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has been challenged in the main appeal. For the sake of convenience, we have considered facts of the main case for deciding the common issues which are involved in all these appeals.2. The appellant, who has approached this Court, was not a party to the litigations before the High Court, but has been constrained to approach this Court as the direction given by the learned Single Judge as well as by the Division Bench of the High Court in the aforestated writ appeal affec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON- REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.731 OF2007OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED ...APPELLANT (S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ... RESPONDENT (S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs.729 OF2007 733 OF2007 736 OF2007 737 OF2007 738 OF2007 740 OF2007 741 OF2007 6008 OF2007 6016 OF2007 6023 OF2007 925 OF2008 1239 OF2008 1240 OF2008 1514 OF2008 1515 OF2008 1516 OF2008 1517 OF2008 1518 OF2008 1519 OF2008 1520 OF2008 1521 OF2008 1522 OF2008 1523 OF2008 1524 OF2008 1527 OF2008 1528 OF2008 1529 OF2008 1531 OF2008 1532 OF2008 1533 OF2008 1535 OF2008 2008 OF2008 2012 OF2008 4321 OF2008 7226 OF2008 7227 OF2008 7230 OF2008 2794 OF2009 2795 OF2009 2796 OF2009 2797 OF2009 1722 OF2010AND CIVIL APPEAL No.6174 OF2010JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. The issue that arise for consideration in this group of appeals is common and may be summarized as follows. Whether the amounts paid by the ONGC to the non-resident assessees /foreign companies for providing ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.697 of 2011 Chaitanya Prakash Audichya . Appellant Versus C.B.I. . Respondent JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. This appeal by Special Leave challenges the judgment and order dated 06-12-2010 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2010 by which the High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The case of the prosecution was that PW1 Chandra Shekhar Bandari was sole proprietor of M/s JCS Associates, which firm was undertaking construction work for governmental agencies. The firm was awarded two contracts in March 2003 by Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Betul, Goa and it was mandatory requirement to have a licence from the office of the Assistant Labour Commissioner, (Central) Vasco. PW1 therefore applied for requisite licence...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4909 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.14256 OF2014 Rahul Yadav & Anr. ... Appellants Versus M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others ... Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2. The appellant is the owner in possession of the premises being land measuring 2571 sq. yards on Rewari-Palwal-Delhi Road, Rewari and Khewat No.1139/941, Khatauni No.1380, Rectangle No.117, Kila No.2412/2 (2-0), Khewat No.1125/930 mm, Khautani No.136 mm, Rectangle No.117, Kila No.24/211 (1-9), Rectangle N. 150, 6/80 share Le. 6 maria out of Kila No.411 (4-0) total measuring Kanal 5 marla in 3 kittas thereabouts. The respondent no.1, namely, Indian Oil Corporation (for short, the Corporation) issued an advertisement in the newspaper on 6.10.2000 for retail outlet dealership in the state of Delhi and Haryana for which the appellant applied and was selected. Letter of intent was issued in his favour on 6.7.2001. It was stipulated in the sai...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1123 OF2015[Arising out of SLP(C) No.321 OF2015 State of Rajasthan and Ors. ... Appellants Versus Mahendra Nath Sharma ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.1124 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.342 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL No.1126 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.461 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL No.1127 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.72 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.649 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1129 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.1008 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1131 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.1155 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1132 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.1159 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1133 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.1220OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1134 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.1327 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1135 OF2015(@ SLP(C) No.1411 OF2015 JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.The respondents were working on different posts of Lecturers, Librarians and PTIs, who retired prior to 1.1.2006. It is not in dispute that all of them were appointed in different years from 1950 to 1976 and all of them retired between 1991 to 2004. It i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.836 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.7082 of 2014) The State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Q Branch C.I.D.,Tirunelveli Range, Tamil Nadu Appellant(s) VERSUS Mariya Anton Vijay Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.837 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.)No.7099 of 2014) The State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Q Branch C.I.D., Thoothukudi Appellant(s) VERSUS Dudinik Valentyn Captain of Vessel & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.(1) Leave granted. (2) These appeals are filed by the State against the common final judgment and order dated 10.07.2014 passed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in Crl. R.C.(MD)No.204 of 2014 and Crl. O.P. (MD) No.6719 of 2014 whereby the High Court partly allowed the criminal revision case and the criminal original petition filed by the accused persons. (3) The relevant facts giving rise to these appeals though have been set out in gr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1506 of 2009 Kamla Kant Dubey . Appellant Versus State of U.P. & Others .... Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2409 of 2009 State of U.P. . Appellant Versus Basant Lal Dubey and others . Respondents JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. These appeals by special leave challenge the judgment and order dated 15.05.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Reference No.6/2008 and in Criminal (Capital) Appeal No.3588 of 2008 acquitting the respondents accused of the charges under Sections 302 read with 34 IPC.2. According to the case of the prosecution:- A) One Brahmadeen Dubey owned lands in District Mirzapur in State of Uttar Pradesh. Under two sale deeds, he sold two parcels of land admeasuring 10 bighas and 6 bighas to Rama Kant Dubey and Sushil Kant Dubey respectively. Two registered deeds in this behalf were executed on 02.02.1993. However, it came to the notice that there was...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 4914-15 OF2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) Nos.603-604/2015) Quantum Securities Pvt. Ltd. & Others Appellant(s) VERSUS New Delhi Television Ltd. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) Leave granted2) These appeals are filed against the Interim Order dated 26.02.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Contempt Petition (L) No.105 of 2013 in Notice of Motion (L) No.1553 of 2013 in Suit (L) No.677 of 2013 and Interim Order dated 31.10.2014 in Contempt Petition No.29 of 2014 in Notice of Motion No.488 of 2014 in Suit No.284 of 2014.3) The facts of the case, which lie in a narrow compass, however, need mention in brief to appreciate the issue involved in these appeals.4) The appellants are the defendants whereas the respondent is the plaintiff.5) The respondent (plaintiff) has filed one suit being Civil Suit (L) No.677 of 2013 (renumbered as Civil Suit No.284/2014) against the appell...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1743/2009 State of J&K . Appellant Versus Wasim Ahmed Malik @ Hamid and another. . Respondents. JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. This Appeal under section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) challenges the judgment and order dated 02.03.2009 passed by the third Additional Sessions Judge i.e. the Designated Court under the Act in File No.26/Challan, acquitting the respondents of the offences under sections 3 and 4 of the Act, section 120-B read with sections 302, 307 and 34 of Ranbir Penal Code and sections 4 and 5 of the Explosives Substances Act, 1908 arising out of FIR No.12 of 1995.2. On the occasion of celebration of Republic Day on 26.01.1995 at about 10:20 a.m. in Maulana Azad Memorial Stadium, Jammu, General KV Krishna Rao, Governor of Jammu and Kashmir was addressing a huge gathering of about 40,000 people including high...
Tag this Judgment!