Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2819 OF2015(Arising Out of SLP (C) No.4148 of 2011) CHARU KISHOR MEHTA ......APPELLANT VERSUS JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER, GREATER BOMBAY REGION & ORS. ......RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment and order dated 01.12.2010 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in Letters Patent Appeal No.268 of 2010 (for short "LPA") in Writ Petition No.9501 of 2009, whereby the High Court dismissed the LPA filed by the appellant and upheld the judgment and order dated 02.03.2010 passed by the learned single Judge of the High Court. For the purpose of considering the rival legal contentions urged on behalf of the parties in this appeal and with a view to find out whether this Court is required to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of the High Court, the necessary facts are briefly stated hereunder: The appellant h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7400 OF2013UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... APPELLANTS VERSUS MAJOR GENERAL SHRI KANT SHARMA & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.7338 OF2013 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7375-7376 OF2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO.7399 OF2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO.9388 OF2013 CIVIL APPEAL NO.9389 OF2013AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.96 OF2014 JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ct'), against an order of Armed Forces Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') with the leave of the Tribunal under Section 31 of the Act or leave granted by the Supreme Court, or bar of leave to appeal before the Supreme Court under Article 136(2) of the Constitution of India, will bar the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India regarding matters related to Armed Forces. Un...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.707 OF2007Edward ...Appellant :Versus: Inspector of Police, Aandimadam Police Station ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.774 OF2007Periyanagayasamy and Ors. ....Appellants :Versus: Inspector of Police, Aandimadam Police Station ....Respondent JUDGMENT Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.1. These appeals have been filed by accused persons against the judgment and order dated 16.3.2006 passed by the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No.1540 of 2002 by which the High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants. The facts of the case as narrated by the prosecution are briefly stated as under:2. The deceased Michaelraj and the accused persons were residents of the same Village in Taluk Udayarapalayam in District Perambalur. There was a land dispute between Michaelraj and the accused persons on account of which there was enmity between them. Originally, the grandmother of the deceased Michaelraj ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2224 OF2011ASHOK ...APPELLANT :VERSUS: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.This criminal appeal arises from final order and judgment dated 13 December 2010 of the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No.296 of 2010 whereby the High Court has upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused-appellant. The accused-appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli for offences under Sections 302, 201 and 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1960, for the murder of his wife Shubhangi and two daughters being Namrata and Janhavi. He was sentenced, inter alia, for life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1 lakh, and in default of payment of fine, rigorous imprisonment of five years, for offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Sentences for offence under Sections 201 and 498A of Indian Penal Code were to run concurrently. The facts of the case are th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5946-5947 OF2014KALYANI MATHIVANAN ... APPELLANT VERSUS K.V. JEYARAJ AND ORS. ... RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.6455-6456 OF2014AND CIVIL APPEAL NOS.8602-8603 OF2014 JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J These appeals have been preferred by the appellants against a common judgment and order dated 26th June, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench in Writ Petition (MD) No.11350 of 2012 and Writ Petition (MD) No.3318 of 2013. The aforesaid writ petitions were preferred by K.V. Jeyaraj and I. Ismail respondents/writ petitioners praying for issuance of a writ of quo warranto directing the appellant - Dr. Kalyani Mathivanan to show cause under what authority she continues to hold the office of the Vice- Chancellor, Madurai Kamaraj University.2. By the impugned judgment the High Court held that the appellant-Dr. Kalyani Mathivanan did not satisfy the eligibility crite...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2759 OF2015(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12858 2009) GRAH RAKSHAK, HOME GUARDS WEL.ASSO. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF H.P. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No.2760 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.16499/2013) C.A. No.2761 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.17050/2013) C.A. Nos. 2762-2764 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.17639-17641/2013) C.A. No.2765 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.18161/2013) C.A. No.2766 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.18803/2013) C.A. No.2767 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19031/2013) C.A. No.2768 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19065/2013) C.A. No.2769 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19096/2013) C.A. No.2770 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19319/2013) C.A. Nos. 2771-2772 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19454-19455/2013) C.A. No.2773 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19499/2013) C.A. Nos. 2774-2775 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19509-19510/2013) C.A. No.2776 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19537/2013) C.A. Nos. 2777-2780 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.19844-19847/2013) C.A. No.2781 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.20021/2013) C.A. Nos. 2782-2783 of 2015 (@SLP(C) No.20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.2194 OF2011Pawan Kumar @ Monu Mittal ... APPELLANT Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. ... RESPONDENTS WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 2195-2196 OF2011Rakesh Anand and Anr. ... APPELLANTS Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. ... RESPONDENTS Criminal Appeal No.2198 OF2011Shiv Kesh Giri @ Lalla ... APPELLANT Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ... RESPONDENT Criminal Appeal No.2199/2011 Devesh Agnihotri ... APPELLANT Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ... RESPONDENT Criminal Appeal No.2200/2011 Rajesh Verma ... APPELLANT Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT N.V. RAMANA, J.These appeals are directed against a common impugned judgment dated 11th February, 2009 of the High court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, by which the appeals of the appellants herein who are accused of murdering one Manjunath, were dismissed.2. Material facts of the case as per prosecution are that the father of appellant Monu Mittal (Accused No...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2822 OF2015(Arising out of SLP(C)NO.21260 OF2011 ARUNBHAI KALYANBHAI SUTARIYA ... APPELLANT VS. NUTAN NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted.2. Upon hearing the learned counsel, we have learnt that the appellant has already filed an appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal at Ahmedabad (DRT), being Securitisation Appeal No.38 of 2001, which is pending. Similarly, the Respondent-Bank has also filed an appeal before the Gujarat State Cooperative Tribunal against order dated 4th November, 2003, passed by the learned Board of Nominees at Ahmedabad in Lavad Case No.39 of 2000.3. As both appeals are pending, we would not like to entertain this appeal on merits. We direct the DRT and the Gujarat State Cooperative Tribunal to decide the appeals pending before them within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.4. During the pendency ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
'NON-REPORTABLE' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 2814-2815 OF2015(arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.33342-43 of 2014) BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. ...Appellant (s) versus SHREEKISHAN OMPRAKASH AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s).2816 OF2015(arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.24871 of 2014) YASHDEEP TREXIM PRIVATE LTD. ...Appellant (s) versus BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. (IN LIQUIDATION) AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.Y. Eqbal, J.: Leave granted.2. These appeals by Special Leave have been filed against the impugned order dated 14.8.2014 passed by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in ACO No.38 of 2014 and APOT No.230 of 2014 in CP. No.2 of 1987. By the impugned order, the Division Bench affirmed the order dated 20.2.2014 passed by the Company Judge in T.A. No.125 of 2012 on an application filed by the appellant praying for a direction to make over the money deposited with the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.37 OF2013MOHAMMED HUSSAIN WAREKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that two appeals which have been filed by the petitioner, being CCI/568/1988 and CCI/569/1988, are pending before the First Cooperative Court at Mumbai.2. We direct the said Court to dispose of the aforesaid appeals within four months from the date of intimation of this order to it.3. Till the appeals are decided, ad-interim relief granted by this Court shall continue.4. In view of the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.5. An intimation of this order be sent to the aforesaid Court forthwith. .......................J.[ ANIL R. DAVE ]. .......................J.[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]. New Delhi; March 10, 2015....
Tag this Judgment!