Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.798 OF2015PROF. N.K. GANGULY APPELLANT Vs. CBI NEW DELHI RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.799/2015 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.800/2015 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.801/2015 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.930/2015 AND CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1537/2015 (Arising Out of SLP (Crl) No.9838 of 2015) (@ SLP (Crl) CRL. M.P. NO.9612 of 2015) JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Delay condoned. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Crl)Crl.M.P. No.9612 of 2015. These appeals arise out of the common judgment and order dated 27.05.2013 passed in Application Nos. 480 of 2013, 41206, 40718, 41006 and 41187 of 2012 and judgment and order by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated and order 07.10.2014 passed in Application No.277KH of 2014 in Special Case No.18 of 2012 by the learned Special Judge, whereby the High Court dismissed the applications filed by the appellants herein under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereina...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5212-5220 OF2007M/S. STATE BANK OF PATIALA APPELLANT THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3185 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.3383 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.3764 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.3766 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.13465 OF2015[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.13359 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL NO.3380 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.3763 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.13464 OF2015[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.13357 OF2015 CIVIL APPEAL NO.4008 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4322 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4987 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4988 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4990 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4991 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4992 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4993 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4994 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4995 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4996 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4997 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.4986 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.5328 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.3381 OF2015CIVIL APPEAL NO.3382 OF2015JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. Leave grant...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE [ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.13407 OF2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.29959/2013) B. Radhakrishnan ...Appellant(s) VERSUS The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.13409 OF2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.30038/2013) K. Padmaraj ...Appellant(s) VERSUS The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are filed against the common final judgment and order dated 02.07.2013 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in W.A. Nos.398 and 399 of 2013 whereby the High Court allowed the appeals filed by the respondents herein and set aside the common order dated 13.09.2010 of the learned Single Judge in W.P. Nos. 9527 and 9528 of 2006 by which the appellants writ petitions were allowed.3. In order to appreciate the issue involved in these appeals, which lie in a narrow compass, few relevant facts need mention infra.4. Mr. B. Radhakrishnan and Mr. K. Padmaraj...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF2014Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH . PETITIONER VERSUS STATE GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY . RESPONDENT JUDGMENT N.V. RAMANA, J.This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is filed by one Dr. Ram Lakhan Singh, an incumbent of Indian Forest Service (1969 Batch, U.P. Cadre) who rendered services to the respondent State and Government of India in various positions for about 35 years till his retirement. The main contention of the petitioner is that he was illegally detained by the respondent authorities after implicating him in false vigilance cases and dishonouring the High Courts directions. Because of the malicious, willful and contemptuous acts of the State and clear abuse of legal process, he and his family members had to suffer a great ordeal of mental agony and heavy financial loss besides being defamed in the society. Hence, he prayed this Court to expres...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 13448 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.9833 of 2015) PAWAN KUMAR AGARWALA ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS GENERAL MANAGER-II & APPOINTING AUTH. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER Leave granted. This appeal by special leave is filed by the appellant as he is aggrieved of the judgment and order dated 26.11.2014 passed by the Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court at Guwahati in Writ Appeal No.192 of 2014 holding that there was no negligence on the part of the respondent (appellant herein) in disbursing the loan and he had taken appropriate steps, however, the other Manager of that Branch, who has been found guilty and levied with lesser penalty, therefore, the minor penalty would visit the respondent (appellant herein). Accordingly, the Division Bench of the High Court modified the penalty of dismissal to one of reduction of one increment for one year and further directed the appellant t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9190-9191 OF2015(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 21952-53 of 2014) Vishwanath Dadu Gurav Since deceased through LRs & others Appellants Versus Dattatray Ganapati Gurav Respondent JUDGMENT Prafulla C. Pant, J.These appeals are directed against order dated 14.3.2012 whereby the High Court of Judicature at Bombay has dismissed the Writ Petition No.2576 of 2003, affirming the order dated 17.10.1997, passed by the Third Additional District Judge, Kolhapur, in Regular Civil Appeal No.124 of 1991. Appellants have further challenged order dated 7.1.2014 passed by the High Court whereby Review Petition Stamp No.33147 of 2012 (in Writ Petition No.2576 of 2003) is dismissed. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the papers on record. Briefly stated, one Chandrabai, issueless widow, resident of Khochi, Taluka Hatkanangale, District Kolhapur, died on 2.12.1984. She was owner of certain properties in the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.13353 OF2015(arising out of SLP(C)No.26311 of 2015) VNS College of Physical Education and Management Studies and others Appellant(s) versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others Respondent(s) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) No.674 OF2015Devi Ahilya Asaskiya Siksha Mahavidyalayin Sanchalak Sangh Petitioner(s) versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others Respondent(s) CIVIL APPEAL Nos.13355-13357 OF2015(arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 28803-28805 of 2015) Preston College and others etc. Appellant(s) Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others Respondent(s) JUDGMENT | | |M.Y. Eqbal, J.: | Leave granted.2. Heard Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants/writ petitioner and Mr. Arjun Garg, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.3. In all these applications the appellants/petitioner, private recognized institutions are aggrieved by the impugned orders passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE [ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.13368 OF2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.26131/2013) Parvaiz Ahmad Parry ...Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 10.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu in L.P.A. No.102 of 2012 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein while upholding the judgment dated 12.11.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court in SWP No.2699 of 2010.3. In order to appreciate the issues involved in the appeal, which lie in a narrow compass, few relevant facts need mention infra.4. The appellant completed B.Sc. with Forestry as one of the major subjects from Garhwal University, Uttarakhand in the year 2001. Thereafter he also completed his M.Sc.(Forestry) from the same University in the year 20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5102 OF2006Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani Appellant(s) versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondent(s) JUDGMENT | | |M.Y. Eqbal, J.: | This appeal by special leave is directed against order dated 13.7.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court. Dismissing Letter Patents Appeal preferred by the appellant against the order of the learned Single Judge who dismissed his writ petition and confirmed the orders passed by the State Minister for Revenue in the proceeding R.T.S.3402/ Pra.kra.309/L-6 dated 18th October, 2002.2. It is the appellants case that his father Shri Nawoosingh Panjumal Panjwani was a displaced person who migrated from Pakistan to India during the period of partition and the appellants family while in Pakistan was having agricultural land over there admeasuring 4 acres 10 gunthas. After migration, the family took shelter at Refugee Camp of Pimpri, Pune in Maharash...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.375 OF2007Jupudy Pardha Sarathy Appellant(s) versus Pentapati Rama Krishna and others Respondent(s) JUDGMENT | | |M.Y. Eqbal, J.: | This appeal by special leave is directed against order dated 21.9.2006 passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, who allowed the appeal preferred by Defendant no.1 and set aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court in the original suit preferred by the appellant.2. The only question that needs consideration in this appeal is as to whether the High Court is correct in law in interpreting the provisions of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') in arriving at a conclusion that the widow of the deceased P. Venkata Subba Rao acquired an absolute interest in the property by the operation of Section 14 of the Act.3. The undisputed facts are that the said suit property originally belonged to one P. Venkata Subba Rao, wh...
Tag this Judgment!