Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1864 OF2011Somabhai Gopalbhai Patel Appellant versus State of Gujarat Respondent JUDGMENT C. NAGAPPAN, J.This appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 14.2.2011 passed by the learned single Judge of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad whereby it has confirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21.3.1997 passed by the learned Special Judge, Banaskandha at Palampur in Special Case No.215 of 1992, wherein the Special Judge had convicted the appellant- accused for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and further convicted him under Section 13(d)(i)(ii)(iii) read with Section 13(2) of the said Act and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2055 of 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.4656 of 2011]. KAILASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL & ANR. ..... APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred against the Order dated 2nd May, 2011 of the High Court of Judicature of Allahabad declining to quash the proceedings against the appellants under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.3. The case of the complainant in the FIR registered on 4th May, 2010 in the Bhelupur Police Station at Varanasi is that her marriage was solemnised on 30th April, 2005. Her brothers who lived abroad gave lot of dowry and cash in the marriage but her family could not fulfil more demands raised by the elder brother of her husbands father, who was the head of the joint family on account of which family members...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.667 of 2011 GUL SINGH @ GULIYA & ORS. ..... APPELLANTS VERSUS STATE OF M.P. & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the conviction and sentence of the appellants under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the murder of Mishribai for which they stand sentenced to life imprisonment apart from conviction and sentence of appellant Gul Singh @ Gulia under Section 376 IPC and conviction of appellants for other offences as appearing from the operative part of the order of the trial Court and the High Court which is clear from the impugned Judgment of the High Court as follows :The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 07/10/1999 of the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Indore, passed in Session Trial No.331/1998 by which the appellants have been convicted under Sections 366, 368 read with Section 3...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1362 OF2010DILAWAR SINGH & ORS. Appellants Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.826 OF2010STATE OF HARYANA .. Appellant Versus BALKAR SINGH & ORS. ..Respondents AND CRIMINAL APPEAL No.830 OF2010CHANDA SINGH .. Appellant Versus RANBIR SINGH & ORS. ..Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Appellants Dilawar Singh (A-1), Yash Pal (A-3) and Shamsher Singh (A-7) in Criminal Appeal No.1362/2010 challenge the legality of their conviction for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and the sentence of life imprisonment and imposition of fine of Rs.5,000/- each and also challenge their conviction for the offence punishable under Section 148 IPC and sentence of imprisonment for two years. Being aggrieved by the acquittal of Balkar Singh (A-4), Ranbir Singh (A-6) and Charan Singh (A-8), State of Haryana and Chanda Singh father of the deceas...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.400 OF2010K. SARAVANAN KARUPPASAMY & ANR. .Petitioners Versus STATE OF TAMILNADU & ORS. ..Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking a writ of mandamus to initiate an independent investigation preferably by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or Special Investigation Team (SIT) into the incident of alleged beating of students of Dr. Ambedkar Government Law College, Chennai on 12.11.2008 by some miscreants so that criminal proceedings could be initiated against the guilty police personnel as well as the other persons responsible for the said incident.2. Brief facts which led to the filing of the writ petition are as follows:- A group of students of Dr. Ambedkar Law College, Chennai belonging to Thevar Community is said to have pasted posters and pamphlets inside the college premises in connection with the birthday celebrations of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2056 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.553/2011) EDMUND S LYNGDOH Appellant Versus STATE OF MEGHALAYA Respondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 2057-58 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2203-2204/2011) DEVA PRASAD SHARMA Appellant Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ...Respondent JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2203-2204/2011 are filed challenging the judgment of the Gauhati High Court confirming the conviction of the appellant-first accused (Deva Prasad Sharma) under Section 420 IPC, 120B IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short the P.C. Act) and enhancement of the sentence imposed on him. Fourth accused (Edmund S. Lyngdoh) has preferred SLP (Crl.) No.553/2011 challenging the reversal of his acquittal and assailing the conviction under Section 420 IPC read with Section 120B IPC.3. Deva Prasad Sharma (A-1) di...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2358 of 2010 MUNNA ... APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF M.P. ... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the conviction and sentence of the appellant for offences under Sections 450 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for which the appellant stands sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years under both heads but the sentences are to run concurrently, apart from being sentenced to pay fine.2. Case of the prosecution as per FIR is that on 19th April, 1993, when the prosecutrix (PW1 was sleeping in her house at 1.00 A.M., the appellant along with co-accused Sahab Singh @ Mutta entered the house of the prosecutrix and both of them committed rape on the prosecutrix and then fled away. They were carrying knife which was shown to the prosecutrix to threaten her if she raised alarm. The prosecutrix narrated the incident to her husband and lodged Firs...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2051 of 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.1235 of 2012]. STATE OF M.P. .APPELLANT VERSUS SHIVSHANKAR ..... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment dated 10th July, 2008 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No.292 of 2005 altering the conviction of the respondent from Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to 304 Part-I of the IPC reducing the sentence from life imprisonment to rigorous imprisonment for seven years while upholding the sentence to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to undergo two years further rigorous imprisonment.3. The case of the prosecution is that on 2nd March, 1999 after celebration of Holi festival, sugar cakes (Batase) were being distributed in front of the house of the complainant by Ramlachhin Gurjar (PW10. Complainant Rems...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.2352-2354 OF2008SRIHARI (DEAD) THROUGH LR. SMT. CH.NIVEDITHA REDDY .APPELLANT VERSUS SYED MAQDOOM SHAH & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT PRAFULLA C.PANT,J.1. All these three appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 21.4.2005 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in A.S.M.P. No.11880 of 2004, A.S.M.P. No.1098 of 2005 and A.S.M.P. No.1099 of 2005 (moved in A.S. No.734 of 1991) whereby the High Court exercising powers under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (hereinafter referred as the Code), has allowed the applications, and directed that the preliminary decree passed in A.S. No.734 of 1991, be amended allotting and dividing half share of Syed Makdoom Shah (defendant No.11) and Syed Hussain Shah in the suit schedule property in addition to 1/4th share of legal heirs of plaintiff Khadar Nawaz Khan (since dead) and 1/4th share of the legal heirs of defendant Feroz...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8750 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.540 of 2009) |COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX | | |(CENTRAL)-I, NEW DELHI |..APPELLANT(S) | | | | |VERSUS | | |VATIKA TOWNSHIP PRIVATE LIMITED |..RESPONDENT(S) | W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.8764 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.1362 of 2009) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8762 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.1339 of 2009) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8773 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.19319 of 2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8763 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.1342 of 2009) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8755 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.31528 of 2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8775 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.22444 of 2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8779 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.27162 of 2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8780 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.27413 of 2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8774 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.20855 of 2008) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8765 OF2014(arising out of SLP (C) No.4769 of 2009) CIVIL APPEAL NO.8760 OF20...
Tag this Judgment!