Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1127 OF2009C.B.I. .. Appellant Versus Karimullah Osan Khan .. Respondent JUDGMENT K. S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. We are, in this case, concerned with the legality of the order passed by the Designated Court under TADA (P) Act, 1987 for Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay, rejecting the application filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (for short CBI) under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short CrPC) for addition of the charges punishable under Section 302 and other charges under the Indian Penal Code (for short IPC) and the Explosives Act read with Section 120-B IPC and also under Section 3(2) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short TADA Act).2. The city of Mumbai and its surrounding areas witnessed a series of bomb blasts on 12.3.1993, whereby 257 persons were killed, 713 persons got injured and extensive damage to properties worth approxima...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2271 of 2011 Phula Singh ..Appellant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh .. Respondent JUDGMENT Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.l. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 24.8.2011/7.9.2011, passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Criminal Appeal No.358 of 2009 reversing the judgment and order dated 19.2.2009, passed by Ld. Special Judge, Hamirpur in Corruption Case No.1 of 2008 acquitting the appellant from the Charges under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The High Court has awarded the appellant sentence of one year RI and a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further RI for a period of six months.2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are: A. That on 20.6.2007, the appellant was working as Kanungo of the particular area and one Vakil Chand fi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO2950-2951 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 5384-5385 of 2013) Union of India Appellant VERSUS M/s. Concrete Products & Const. Co. Etc. ...Respondents JUDGMENT SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals impugn the final judgment and decree dated 21st March, 2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in OSA No.44 & 45 of 2012 and M.P. No.1 of 2012, whereby the letters patent appeals of the Union of India were dismissed. The appellant had entered into agreements with the respondents on 30th January, 1983 and 30th March, 1984 for supply of mono block concrete sleepers (in short Sleepers). The agreements were renewed from time to time under which the Union of India agreed to pay specified rates for supply of each sleeper. The agreements/contracts also provided that the rates payable shall be based on certain standard rates of principal raw materials, such as cement, High...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3034 OF2007Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal Appellant VERSUS Jagdish Chandra Singh Bora & Anr. Etc. ..Respondents With CIVIL APPEAL No.3036 OF2007JUDGMENT SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.1. These appeals have been filed by the Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal, Haridwar (hereinafter referred to as PSCU) challenging the judgment dated 2nd March, 2006 of the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital rendered in Writ Petition Nos. 149, 129, 135, 136, 137, 147, 148, 162, 169, 255, 302, 186, and 300 of 2004. By the aforesaid judgment, the High Court has given a direction to the appellant to give weightage of 10 bonus marks to the trained apprentice candidates as per the Uttaranchal Subordinate Service [Emergency Direct Recruitment (First Amendment)]. Rules, 2003 in the selection held by UPSC; and after adding 10 marks, merit list of the selected candidates be prepared and recommended for the appointmen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.239 OF2003State Bank of Patiala and another Appellants Versus Ram Niwas Bansal (Dead) through LRs. Respondents WITH TRANSFER CASE (C) No.79 OF2013JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Ram Niwas Bansal, the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents 1 to 4, the legal heirs who have been brought on record after his death during the pendency of this appeal, while posted as Accountant at the Narnaul Branch of the appellant-Bank in the Officer Cadre, was served with a charge-sheet dated 20.10.1980 for certain financial irregularities. Two supplementary charge-sheets dated 15.1.1981 and 8.1.1982 were also issued to the said officer. After explanation was offered by late Ram Niwas Bansal, the disciplinary authority appointed an Enquiry Officer who, after conducting the enquiry, submitted his report to the General Manager (Operations) of the Bank holding that certain charges had been proved, some charges had been partly proved and s...
Tag this Judgment!