Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.242 OF2014(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.8387 of 2013) Dasan Appellant Versus State of Kerala & Anr. Respondents JUDGMENT (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. In this appeal, judgment and order dated 17/1/2012 passed by the Kerala High Court confirming the appellants conviction under Section 326 of the Penal Code is under challenge. We have granted application for impleadment of Uddesh who was examined as PW-2 as he had suffered grievous injury at the hands of the appellant. He is, therefore, party to the present appeal.3. The appellant is original Accused 1. He was tried along with seven others by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Thrissur in Criminal Complaint No.23 of 1997 for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 326 read with Section 149 of the Penal Code. Learned Magistrate convicted the appellant for offence punishable u...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.760 OF2005REVUTAPPA APPELLANT Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA RESPONDENT JUDGMENT (SMT.) RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.1. This appeal is forwarded to this Court by the Jail Authorities. It is directed against the judgment and order dated 8/10/2012, passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in Criminal Appeal No.1721 of 2001, whereby the High Court confirmed the judgment of the Sessions Court convicting the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 506, 201 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code and sentencing him, inter alia, to life imprisonment.2. The prosecution story could be shortly stated. Complainant Siddakka was married to the appellant, five years prior to 25/8/2000 i.e. from the date of the incident. After the marriage, the appellant started suspecting Siddakkas fidelity and when she gave birth to a male child, he told her that the child is not of his lineage...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.896 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.21303 OF2013 SANJAY KUMAR APPELLANT Vs. ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been filed against the final impugned judgment and order dated 21.03.2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in MAC Appeal No.549 of 2007, urging various legal grounds and contentions for further enhancement of compensation in the case of a motor accident involving the appellant whereby the High Court enhanced the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Delhi (in short the Tribunal) by [pic].1,52,336/- to a total sum of [pic].6,35,808/-. The Tribunal had awarded compensation of [pic].4,83,472/- under various heads along with 7% interest per annum from the date of filing of the petition till the date of realization of payment.3. The brief facts of the case are given hereunder: The appellant, Sanjay ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.897 OF2014[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.30515 of 2013]. Anand Agro Chem India Ltd. .. Appellant(s) -vs- Suresh Chandra & Ors. .. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT C. NAGAPPAN, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the interim Order dated 31.7.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Petition no.14936 of 2013 whereby the Division Bench rejected the prayer of the appellant to stay the arrest of the Directors and occupiers of the appellant company.-.3. The facts in nutshell are as follows. Respondents 1 to 3 supplied sugarcane to the sugar mill of the appellant in the year 2007-08, for which the appellant has not paid the price in spite of several representations made by the respondents 1 to 3 herein. This led to the filing of Writ Petition in Writ-C no.14936 of 2013 by respondents 1 to 3 seeking for issuance of the Writ of Mandamus directing the appellant herein...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.877 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30283 of 2008) Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. Appellants Versus Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.878 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30455 of 2008) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.879 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30470 of 2008) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.880 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30467 of 2008) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.881 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30465 of 2008) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.882 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30469 of 2008) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.883 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30543 of 2008) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.884 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30546 of 2008) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.885 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) No.30548 of 2008) AND CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 886-894 OF2014(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 15847-15855 of 2010) JUDGMENT R.M. LODHA, J.Delay condoned in S.L.P. (C) Nos.15847-15855 of 2010. Leave granted.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.895 OF2014(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.34978 of 2010) World Sport Group (Mauritius) Ltd. Appellants Versus MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Respondent JUDGMENT A. K. PATNAIK, J.Leave granted.2. This is an appeal against the order dated 17.09.2010 of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Appeal (Lodging) No.534 of 2010. Facts:3. The facts very briefly are that on 30.11.2007 the Board of Control for Cricket in India (for short BCCI) invited tenders for IPL (Indian Premier League) Media Rights for a period of ten years from 2008 to 2017 on a worldwide basis. Amongst the tenders submitted, the bid of World Sports Group India (for short WSG India) was accepted by BCCI. By a pre-bid arrangement, however, the respondent was to get the media rights for the sub-continent for the period from 2008 to 2010. Accordingly, on 21.01.2008 BCCI and the respondent entered into a Media Rights License Agree...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL N. 836 OF2014(@ out of SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.36738/2012) Dipak Babaria & Anr. Appellants Versus State of Gujarat & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT H.L. Gokhale J.Leave Granted.2. This appeal by Special Leave seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 30.8.2012 rendered by a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court dismissing Writ Petition (PIL) No.44 of 2012 filed by the appellants herein. The Writ Petition had various prayers, but essentially it sought to challenge the permission granted by the Collector, Bhuj, to sell certain parcels of agricultural land situated in district Kutch, which were said to have been purchased earlier by the respondent No.4 herein, one Indigold Refinery Limited of Mumbai, for industrial purpose in favour of respondent No.5 i.e. one Alumina Refinery Limited, Navi Mumbai, as being impermissible under the provisions of the Gujarat (earlier Bombay prior to th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7084 OF2005|M/s Mamta Surgical Cotton | | |Industries, Rajasthan |..Appellant(s) | Versus |Assistant Commissioner | | |(Anti-Evasion), Bhilwara, Rajasthan |..Respondent(s) | WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7085-7093 of 2005 |M/s Mamta Surgical Cotton | | |Industries, Rajasthan |..Appellant(s) | Versus |Assistant Commissioner | | |(Anti-Evasion), Bhilwara, Rajasthan |..Respondent(s) | WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7094-7097 OF2005|M/s Mamta Surgical Cotton | | |Industries, Rajasthan |..Appellant(s) | Versus |Assistant Commissioner | | |(Anti-Evasion), Bhilwara, Rajasthan |..Respondent(s) | ORDER1 These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Sales Tax Revision No.932 of 2002 and connected matters, dated 23.01.2003. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has opined that surgical cotton is a commercially different commodity from cotton an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.142 OF2006Viplav Sharma Petitioner Versus Union of India and others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.349 OF2009WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NOs.30, 152, 156, 177, 191, 194 and 217 OF2010AND WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.119 OF2011ORDER K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, learned senior counsel appearing for some of the Deemed Universities, raised a preliminary objection in accepting the Prof. Tandons report, which recommended de-notifying the Deemed University status to 44 institutions. Learned senior counsel submitted that none of the procedures enumerated in the draft 2008 Regulations or 2010 Regulations, or the statutory procedures laid down in the UGC Act, have been followed by the Committee. Learned senior counsel also submitted that under the UGC Act, no power is conferred on the Central Government to constitute such a Committee, overlooking the Universities Grant Commission.2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5601-5602 OF2007M.D. JACOB ... APPELLANT VS. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE LTD. & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, J.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company.2. The appellant was a victim of road accident on 27th July, 1997. On account of several serious injuries including amputation of complete left hand, severe injuries in head, dislocation of bones in hip and both knees and severe injuries in foot, the Doctor assessed his disability at 100%.3. The appellant preferred a claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Chennai and sought compensation of Rs.26,00,000/- (rupees twenty six lacs). The Claims Tribunal allowed a claim for Rs.14,20,000/- (rupees fourteen lacs and twenty thousand only) vide judgment dated 9.8.2000 rendered in M.C.O.P. No.3365 of 1997. The claim allowed on different heads includes: i) Loss ...
Tag this Judgment!