Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) No.303 OF 201.IN WRIT PETITION (C) No.598 OF 201.Aneesh D. Lawande & Anr. Petitioners Versus The State of Goa and others Respondents ORDER As we have already disposed of the writ petition, nothing survives in the Contempt Petition and, therefore, the same is dismissed. ..J.[Anil R. Dave]. ..J.[Dipak Misra]. New Delhi; August 30, 2013....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1339 OF2013(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5120/2012) R. JAYANTHI Appellant(s) :VERSUS: STATE OF KARNATAKA Respondent(s) ORDER Leave granted.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the State of Karnataka.3. It appears that the appellant did not have proper representation when Criminal Appeal No.1200 of 2005 came to be allowed by a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court on 3rd February, 2012. This was because the case papers were transferred to another Advocate at the last moment and he did not appear when the matter was taken up. By judgment and order dated 3rd February, 2012, the order passed by the Trial Court acquitting the appellant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, has been reversed and she has been convicted and sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 7 and to undergo simple imprisonment for one year...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7704-7705 OF2013(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.19572-19573/2012) RAJIBA LOACHAN PATRO Appellant(s) :VERSUS: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) ORDER Leave granted.2. Heard Mr. P.N. Mishra, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, and the counsel for the respondents.3. This appeal seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 17.11.2011 passed by the High Court of Orissa in Writ Petition (C) No.20630 of 2010, whereby the High Court has allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.5 herein. The appellant sought review of that order by filing Review Petition No.64 of 2012 which was rejected by order dated 21.3.2012. This order is also challenged in the present appeal.4. The short facts giving rise to the filing of this appeal are this wise. The first respondent Bharat Petroleum Corporation had issued an advertisement for allotment of L.P.G. Dealership in various districts ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7324 OF 201.(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C)NO.29736 OF 2011.AKASH TR.FATHER & LEGAL GUARDIAN ... APPELLANT VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ... RESPONDENT ORDER 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Miscellaneous Appeal No.2942/2008, dated 17.05.2010. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has enhanced the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') from Rs.4,07,000/- to Rs.4,77,000/-.3. The claimants had approached the High Court for grant of compensation since the minot child had lost his both legs in a motor vehicle accident. The Tribunal, after considering the evidence on record, has come to the conclusion that the only compensation that would be payable to the child is a sum of Rs.4,07,000/- with interest.4. Aggrieved by the award so passed by the Tribunal, the appellant...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.598 OF 201.Aneesh D. Lawande & others Petitioners Versus The State of Goa and others Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.The present litigation exposits a sad sad scenario. It is sad because a chaos has crept in in the lives of some students and it is further sad as the State of Goa and its functionaries have allowed ingress of systemic anarchy throwing propriety to the winds possibly harbouring the attitude of utter indifference and nurturing an incurable propensity to pave the path of deviancy. The context is admission to Post Graduate courses in a single Government medical college at Goa. The insensitivity of the authorities administering medical college admissions was seriously decried by a three-Judge Bench in Convenor, MBBS/BDS Selection Board and others v. Chandan Mishra and others[1]. and further echoed in Medical Council of India v. Madhu Singh and others[2].. The Court in Chandan M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7279 OF 201.(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NO.22265 OF 2007.BAL GOPAL MAHESHWARI & ORS. APPELLANTS VERUS SANJEEV KUMAR GUPTA RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.Leave granted. This appeal is preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 17th September, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.44387 of 2007. By the impugned judgment, the High Court exercised its revisional jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and set aside the orders dated 31st May, 2007 and 9th January, 2006 passed by the District Judge, J.P. Nagar in S.C.C Revision No.1 of 2006 and Civil Judge, (S.D.), J.P. Nagar in Suit No.17 of 1998 respectively. Thus, defence of the respondent which was struck off by the Courts below was restored by the High Court.2. The appellants filed Suit No.17 of 1998 on 21st Se...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1301 OF 201.(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.)NO.5294 OF 2012.GULAB CHAND ...APPELLANT VERSUS PRADEEP KR. DEHALWAL AND ANR. ...RESPONDENTS ORDER 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior in Criminal Revision No.704 of 2011, dated 23.09.2011. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has set aside the order passed by the Trial Court on an application filed by the prosecution under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('the Code' for short).3. The Trial Court as well as the High Court has referred to the facts in detail. Therefore, we will only advert to the facts of the case briefly and they are as follows :- The incident occurred on 04.05.2007 at around 3.30 p.m. in the house of the Respondent No.1 -Pradeep Dehalwal, where the deceased-Nitesh succumbed to a bullet injury. Therea...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.7212-7213 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.29306-29307 of 2010) Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd. Appellant Versus Vemuganti Ramakrishan Rao & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals arise out of a judgment and order dated 7th September 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Writ Appeal No.936 of 2006 and an order dated 21st August 2009 passed in W.A.M.P. No.2901 of 2008 in W.A. No.936 of 2006 whereby the High Court has dismissed the Writ Appeal and the review petition filed by the appellant holding that the LAO/Collector, Land Acquisition having made the Award beyond the period of two years stipulated in Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act, the acquisition proceedings initiated by the authorities have lapsed.3. The appellant happens to be a Government company engaged in coal mining operations in the State of Andhra P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7306 OF2013(Arising out of SLP (C) No.20367 of 2009) I.S. SIKANDAR (D) BY LRs. ... APPELLANTS VS. K. SUBRAMANI & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT V. Gopala Gowda, J.Leave granted.2. This civil appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.12.2008 passed in Regular First Appeal No.97 of 2001 by the High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore, urging certain relevant facts and legal contentions, whereby the High Court has reversed the judgment and decree passed in the Original Suit No.2012 of 1985 dated 25.09.2000 by the X1th Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, Bangalore and has modified the decree by allowing the appeal, granting the decree for specific performance of the Agreement of Sale in favour of the respondent No.1/plaintiff in relation to the suit schedule property. Further, it has granted the decree of permanent injunction against the defendants restraining them from interfering ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7177 OF 201.(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(C)NO.13303 OF 2009.M/S.ISWARYA ASSOCIATES ...APPELLANT VERSUS THE BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS ORDER 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No.387 of 2009, dated 25.02.2009 whereby the High Court has dismissed the Writ Appeal filed by the appellant herein.3. By proceedings dated 26.12.2008, the Assistant Revenue Officer, the Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike ('the B.B.M.P.' for short), had granted temporary license/permission to the appellant herein for collection of the parking fee in a particular area. Subsequently, by its order dated 02.01.2009, the respondents have cancelled the license/ permission granted by the Assistant Revenue Officer. It is this action of the respondents which had prompted the appellant herein to approach the Writ ...
Tag this Judgment!