Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6082 OF 200.Nirma Industries Ltd. & Anr. ...Appellants VERSUS Securities & Exchange Board of India ...Respondent JUDGMENT SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR,J.1. This statutory appeal is filed under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as the SEBI Act) against the order dated 5th June, 2008 (impugned order) passed by the Security Appellate Tribunal (SAT) whereby SAT has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants impugning the direction contained in the communication dated 30th April, 2007 of SEBI (SEBI order). By the aforesaid order, the request of the appellants for withdrawal of an offer to acquire the equity shares of Shree Ram Multi Tech Limited (SRMTL) under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (Takeover Code/Takeover Regulation) has been rejected. Facts :2. On 22nd March, 2002, the Promoters (including f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 2 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.729 OF 201.3 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5946 of 2012 Central Bureau of Investigation .... Appellant(s) Versus V. Vijay Sai Reddy .... Respondent(s) JUDGMENT P. Sathasivam, J.1) Leave granted. 2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 13.06.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No.4387 of 2012, whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)- the appellant herein seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondent herein. Brief facts:3. On the orders of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition Nos. 794, 6604 and 6979 of 2011 dated 10.08.2011, the CBI, Hyderabad, on 17.08.2011, registered a case being R.C. No.19(A)/2011-CBI-Hyderabad dated 17.05.2011 under Sections 120-B read with Sections 409, 420 and 477-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in sho...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.730 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.3404 of 2013) Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy .... Appellant(s) Versus Central Bureau of Investigation .... Respondent(s3. JUDGMENT P.Sathasivam, J.1) Leave granted. 2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 24.01.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No.8750 of 2012 in R.C. 19(A)/2011-CBI- Hyderabad, whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein for grant of bail. 3) The only question posed for consideration is whether the appellant- herein has made out a case for bail. Brief facts:4. (a) On the orders of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition Nos. 794, 6604 and 6979 of 2011 dated 10.08.2011, the Central Bureau of Investigation (in short the CBI), Hyderabad, registered a case being R.C. No.19(A)/2011-CBI-Hyderabad dated 17.08.2011 un...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4539 OF 201.(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.30300 of 2011) ANAMIKA ROY Appellant(s) VERSUS JATINDRA CHOWRASIYA AND OTHERS Respondent(s) M.Y. EQBAL, J.: Leave granted.2. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 10.2.2011 passed by learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court in S.A. No.342 of 2007, whereby the second appeal filed by the defendant-respondents was allowed, the judgments and decrees of the courts below were set aside and the matter was remitted to the trial court after expressing the view that considering the provisions of Section 13(4) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 it is a duty cast upon the Court to consider whether the requirement of the plaintiff could be satisfied by evicting the defendant from a part only of the suit property, plaintiff-appellant has preferred this appeal by special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The trial court and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.747 OF 201.(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.4336 (Crl.M.P.No.3518/2013) P. Ramaswamy ...Appellant Versus State (U.T.) of Andaman & Nicobar Islands Respondent ORDER 1. Delay condoned. The application for impleadment is allowed.2. Leave granted.3. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 13/07/2012 passed in Criminal Appeal No.1/2011 and the judgment and order dated 10/12/2012 passed in CRA Nos. 11, 12 & 17/2012 by the High Court of Calcutta. By the impugned order dated 13/07/2012 passed in Criminal Appeal No.1/2011 the High Court converted the conviction of the appellant from Section 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, the SC & ST Act) to Section 354 of the IPC. The High Court, accordingly, partly allowed the appeal by modifying the sentence imposed by the trial c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1450 OF 200.Kumar .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Tamil Nadu .... Respondent(s) 2 JUDGMENT P.Sathasivam,J.1) This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23.04.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No.792 of 2007 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein and confirmed the order of conviction and sentence dated 30.07.2007 passed by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, in Sessions Case No.56 of 2004. 2) Brief facts: (a) The marriage of Vijayalakshmi (the deceased) and Thiruselvam was solemnized on 06.09.2001 at Murugan Nagar, Zerinakadu, Yercaud, Tamil Nadu. After the marriage, she was staying at her matrimonial home in a joint family consisting of her husband, Krishnan (father-in-law), Chellammal (mother-in-law) and Kumar-the appellant/accused, brother-in-law of the deceased. After...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
P. Sathasivam, J.1) Leave granted.2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 08.10.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No. 6732 of 2012 in R.C. 19(A)/2011-CBI-Hyderabad, whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein for grant of bail.3) The only question posed for consideration is whether the appellant-herein has made out a case for bail.Brief facts:4) On the orders of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition Nos. 794, 6604 and 6979 of 2011 dated 10.08.2011, the Central Bureau of Investigation (in short “the CBI”), Hyderabad, registered a case being R.C. No. 19(A)/2011-CBI-Hyderabad dated 17.08.2011 under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 409 and 477-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(c) and (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short “the PC Act”) agains...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
P. Sathasivam, J.1) This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 23.04.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No. 792 of 2007 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein and confirmed the order of conviction and sentence dated 30.07.2007 passed by the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, in Sessions Case No. 56 of 2004.2) Brief facts:(a) The marriage of Vijayalakshmi (the deceased) and Thiruselvam was solemnized on 06.09.2001 at Murugan Nagar, Zerinakadu, Yercaud, Tamil Nadu.After the marriage, she was staying at her matrimonial home in a joint family consisting of her husband, Krishnan (father-in-law), Chellammal (mother-in-law) and Kumar-the appellant/accused, brother-in-law of the deceased. After one year of the marriage, a baby girl was born out of the said wedlock.(b) It is the case of the prosecution that after the birth of the girl child, the deceased was harassed and tortur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
P. Sathasivam, J.1) Leave granted.2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 24.01.2013 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No. 8750 of 2012 in R.C. 19(A)/2011-CBI-Hyderabad, whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein for grant of bail.3) The only question posed for consideration is whether the appellant- herein has made out a case for bail.Brief facts:4) (a) On the orders of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition Nos. 794, 6604 and 6979 of 2011 dated 10.08.2011, the Central Bureau of Investigation (in short “the CBI”), Hyderabad, registered a case being R.C. No. 19(A)/2011-CBI-Hyderabad dated 17.08.2011 under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 409 and 477-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(c) and (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short “the PC Act”) a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
M.Y. Eqbal, J.Leave granted.2. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 10.2.2011 passed by learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court in S.A. No.342 of 2007, whereby the second appeal filed by the defendant-respondents was allowed, the judgments and decrees of the courts below were set aside and the matter was remitted to the trial court after expressing the view that considering the provisions of Section 13(4) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 it is a duty cast upon the Court to consider whether the requirement of the plaintiff could be satisfied by evicting the defendant from a part only of the suit property, plaintiff-appellant has preferred this appeal by special leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The trial court and the first appellate court had passed decree for eviction against the defendant/tenant in respect of the entire suit premises in question.3. The litigation between the parties started on the filing of Title Suit No.66 of 1993 by the plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment!