Court : Supreme Court of India
1. Two riparian states – Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra – of the inter-state Godavari river are principal parties in the suit filed under Article 131 of the Constitution of India read with Order XXIII Rules 1,2 and 3 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966. The suit has been filed by Andhra Pradesh (Plaintiff) complaining violations by Maharashtra (1st Defendant) of the agreements dated 06.10.1975 and 19.12.1975 which were endorsed in the report dated 27.11.1979 containing decision and final order (hereafter to be referred as “award”) and further report dated 07.07.1980 (hereafter to be referred as “further award) given by the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal (for short, ‘Tribunal’). The violations alleged by Andhra Pradesh against Maharashtra are in respect of construction of Babhali barrage into their reservoir/water spread area of Pochampad project. The other four riparian states of the inter-state Godavari river – Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SUIT No.1 OF 200.State of Andhra Pradesh Plaintiff Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Defendants WITH WRIT PETITION [C]. No.134 OF 200.WRIT PETITION [C]. No.210 OF 200.WRIT PETITION [C]. No.207 OF 200.AND CONTEMPT PETITION [C]. No.142 OF 200.IN ORIGINAL SUIT No.1 OF 200.JUDGMENT R.M. LODHA, J.Original Suit No.1 of 2006 Two riparian states Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra of the inter- state Godavari river are principal parties in the suit filed under Article 131 of the Constitution of India read with Order XXIII Rules 1,2 and 3 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966. The suit has been filed by Andhra Pradesh (Plaintiff) complaining violations by Maharashtra (1st Defendant) of the agreements dated 06.10.1975 and 19.12.1975 which were endorsed in the report dated 27.11.1979 containing decision and final order (hereafter to be referred as award) and further report dated 07.07.1980 (hereafter to be referred as further awa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
[ REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1967 OF 201.(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.20635 of 2011) State of Orissa & Ors. Appellants Vs. Sri Jagabandhu Panda Respondent WITH C.A.No.1968 OF 201.arising out of SLP(Civil) No.8676/2013 JUDGMENT M.Y.EQBAL,J.C.A.No.1967 of 2013 arising out of SLP(Civil) No.20635/2011 Leave granted.2. This appeal at the instance of State of Orissa is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.10.2010, whereby the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court refused to interfere with the order passed by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.97/2009.3. The facts of the case in brief are as under:4. The respondent was appointed pursuant to the advertisement dated 5.4.1984 on the post of Ore Dressing Engineer in Class-1 Junior Grade of the State Services in the pay scale of Rs.850-1450. The respondent in response to the appointment letter dated 2.11.1984 joined in the said service on...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
M.Y. Eqbal, J.C.A.No.1967 of 2013 arising out of SLP (Civil) No.20635/20111. Leave granted.2. This appeal at the instance of State of Orissa is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.10.2010, whereby the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court refused to interfere with the order passed by the Orissa Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.97/2009.3. The facts of the case in brief are as under:4. The respondent was appointed pursuant to the advertisement dated 5.4.1984 on the post of Ore Dressing Engineer in Class-1 Junior Grade of the State Services in the pay scale of Rs.850-1450. The respondent in response to the appointment letter dated 2.11.1984 joined in the said service on 14.11.1984. Between 18.6.1996 and 19.6.2001 he was deployed in Steel and Mines Department on certain terms and conditions, but he was to draw the salary from the Directorate of Geology. He was again deployed as officer on Special Duty in Steel and Mines Department between 10.9.2003 to 8.9.2006 on certain t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7934 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C) No.33471 of 2011) Esha Ekta Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited and others Appellants versus Municipal Corporation of Mumbai and others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.7935 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C) No.33601 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL No.7936 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C) No.33940 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL No.7937 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C) No.35402 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL No.7938 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C) No.35324 of 2011 TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.55 OF 201.JUDGMENT G. S. Singhvi, J.1. In last five decades, the provisions contained in various municipal laws for planned development of the areas to which such laws are applicable have been violated with impunity in all the cities, big or small, and those entrusted with the task of ensuring implementation of the master plan, etc., have miserably failed to perform their duties. It is highly regrettable that ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1964 OF 201.(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.24916 OF 2008.LAJJ.RAM & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & ORS. RESPONDENTS ORDER 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil Writ Petition No.14018 of 2008, dated 13.08.2008, whereby and whereunder the High Court has dismissed the aforesaid Writ Petition filed by the appellants.3. The dispute relates to acquisition of lands situated in village Lahora and Sarangpur, Chandigarh, by the respondent No.1 for the purpose of development of complex for important projects and allied purposes, i.e., Chandigarh Science Park and Institutional Area and also for regulated and planned development under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952.4. The respondent No.1 had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Ac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1843 OF 201.(SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.36931 OF 2009.STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS M/S.SYSTEMATIC CONSCOM LIMITED RESPONDENT W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.1928 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.1264 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1929 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.1268 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1930 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.1272 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1931 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.1275 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1932 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.1277 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1933 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.1279 of 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1847 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.15025 of 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1853 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.15036 of 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1851 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.15052 of 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1852 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.15053 of 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1850 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.15060 of 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1848 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.15062 of 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1849 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.15065 of 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1869 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.19369 of 2010 CIVIL APPEAL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.353 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.5663 of 2011 Ramesh Kumar Soni Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh Respondent JUDGMENT T.S. THAKUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. The short question that falls for determination in this appeal is whether the appellant could be tried by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, for the offences punishable under Sections 408, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC notwithstanding the fact that the First Schedule of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as amended by Code of Criminal Procedure (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act of 2007, made offences punishable under Sections 467, 468 and 471 of the Penal Code triable only by the Court of Sessions. The Trial Court of 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur has answered that question in the negative and held that after the amendment the appellant could be tried only by the Court of Sessions. That view has been affirmed by t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.367 OF 201.(SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CRL.)NO.1214 OF 2013.PADMALAYAN & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS SARASAN & ANR. RESPONDENTS ORDER 1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Revision Petition No.1831 of 2004, dated 11.10.2012. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has confirmed the orders passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2011, dated 11.3.2004.3. On a private complaint filed by the respondents herein for offences under Sections 141, 142, 143, 148, 149, 307, 324, 37 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('the IPC' for short), the learned Magistrate had convicted the appellants herein and had sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two years alongwith fine under Section 324 of the IPC. Being aggrieved by the said order, the accused persons had approac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTBLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1643 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C) No.22332 of 2009 State of Kerala and others Appellants Versus Sneha Cheriyan and another ..Respondents WITH C. A. No.1644 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22260 of 2009 C. A. No.1645 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22326 of 2009 C. A. NO.1646 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22558 of 2009 C. A. NO.1647 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22674 of 2009 C. A. NO.1648 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22742 of 2009 C. A. NO.1649 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22843 of 2009 C. A. NO.165O OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22404 of 2009 C. A. NO.1651 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22416 of 2009 C. A. NO.1652 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22422 of 2009 C. A. NO.1653 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22423 of 2009 C. A. NO.1654 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22393 of 2009 C. A. NO.1655 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22352 of 2009 C. A. NO.1656 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.22493 of 2009 C. A. NO.1657 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.23037 of 2009 C. A. NO.1658 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.23689 of 2009 C. A. NO.1659 OF 201.@ SLP(C) No.25745 of 2009 C. A. NO.1660 OF 201...
Tag this Judgment!