Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6183 OF2001Sebastiao Luis Fernandes (Dead) Through Lrs. & Ors. Appellants Vs. K.V.P. Shastri (Dead) Through Lrs. & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT V. Gopala Gowda, J.This civil appeal is filed by the appellants as they are aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the High Court of Bombay at Goa passed on 14.9.1998 by the learned single Judge in Second Appeal No.30 of 1986 raising various questions of law and grounds in support of the same. In this judgment for the sake of convenience the rank of the parties is described according to their position before the trial court. The appellants are the legal representatives of the plaintiff and the respondents are the legal representatives of the defendants. The suit was instituted by the original plaintiff in the Court of Civil Judge, Sr. Division at Quepem (hereinafter referred to as the trial court) in Civil Suit No.14091 of 1948.2. The relevant brief fa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1939 OF2004GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited (Formerly known as SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals (India) Limited) Appellant Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1940 OF2004WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1941 OF2004WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1942 OF2004AND CIVIL APPEAL NOS._10901-10902_OF2013(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS.27241-27242 OF2010 JUDGMENT R.M. LODHA,J.Leave granted in SLP(C) Nos.27241-27242 of 2010.2. This is a group of six appeals, by special leave, four arising from the judgment of the Karnataka High Court and two from the Delhi High Court.3. The two High Courts, Karnataka and Delhi, have taken diametrical opposite view on the question whether the prices fixed under the Drugs (Prices Control) Order (for short, DPCO) in respect of drugs/formulations would be operative in respect of all sales subsequent to 15 days from the date of the notification by the Government in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.224 OF2011IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.10660 OF2010Rajeshwar Singh Petitioner Versus Subrata Roy Sahara & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. We may, at the outset, point out that, at this stage, we are only examining the maintainability of this contempt petition, on which arguments have been advanced by the learned senior counsels on either side. This contempt petition has been preferred under Article 129, 142 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for short the Act) and Rule 12 of the Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975.2. Shri Ram Jethmalani, learned senior counsel appearing for the first respondent, submitted that this contempt petition is not maintainable since it has been filed without the consent of the Attorney General of India or other officer mentioned in Section 15 of the Act. Learned sen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10918 OF2013(arising out of SLP (C) No.4639 of 2010) PUTTAMMA & ORS. . APPELLANTS VERSUS K. L. NARAYANA REDDY & ANR. .RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants-claimants in motor accident case against the judgment and order dated 19th March, 2009 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore in a motor accident case being Miscellaneous First Appeal No.2344 of 2004(MV). They are not happy with the meager enhancement of compensation granted by the High Court.3. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- That Ramadas, aged about 48 years, was working as a Typesetting Assistant in Computer Section of the Mysore Printers Limited (Deccan Herald). On 27th July, 1999 at about 1.30 a.m. while he was returning home on his scooter bearing Registration No.KA03K7514on Hosur-Luskar road, ne...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2061-2062 OF2013(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 4149-4150/2011) MARY PAPPA JEBAMANI ..Appellant Versus GANESAN & ORS. ..Respondents JUDGMENT GYAN SUDHA MISRA, J.1. Leave as prayed for was granted and hence the counsel for the contesting parties were finally heard.2. The complainant/appellant (Mary Pappa Jebamani) herein has filed this appeal by way of special leave bearing SLP (Crl.) No.4149/11) against the judgment and order dated 25.2.2010 passed in Crl. R.C. (MD) No.620/2008 of Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court by which the learned single Judge while exercising his revisional jurisdiction was pleased to set aside the judgment and order dated 26.6.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Court, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputhur being the first appellate court who had been pleased to set aside the order of acquittal passed by the trial court against the accused/respondents herein ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON - REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2063 of 2013 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.7707 OF2013 Manoj @ Panu ... Appellant vs. State of Haryana ... Respondent JUDGMENT V. Gopala Gowda, J.Leave granted. The application for bail is rejected.2. This appeal is filed by the appellantManoj against the final judgment and order dated 13.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No.1357-SB of 2007 whereby the High Court has confirmed the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Bhiwani in Sessions Case No.21-RBT of 2006 dated 23.04.2007 for the offences punishable under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (I.P.C. in short) and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced the appellant-Manoj as under:- |Under Section 307, IPC |Rigorous imprisonment for a period| | |of ten years and to pay fine of | | |Rs.5000/-. In default of paymen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2013(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 23807-23808 of 2012) Lakshmana Rao Yadavalli & Anr. .....Appellants. Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOs. OF2013(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.25219-25220 of 2012) JUDGMENT1ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the Judgment delivered by the High Court of Andhra Pradeh in W.P.No.34683 of 2011 and 894 of 2012 dated 17th July, 2012, the appellants have filed these appeals.3. The facts giving rise to the present litigation in a nut-shell are as under: The appellants, Shri Lakshmana Rao Yadavalli and Shri Dunna Ramulu were desirous of being appointed as District and Sessions Judges (Entry Level) in the A.P. Higher Judicial Service and therefore, had applied for the post and they also found their names in the select list at serial nos.9 and 12 respectively.4. Before they could be appointed to the post in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.8283 of 2012) State of Rajasthan and others ... Appellants Versus M/s. Basant Agrotech (India) Ltd. ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.8288 of 2012) State of Rajasthan and others ... Appellants Versus M/s. Solaris Chemtech Industries Ltd. ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.8291 of 2012) State of Rajasthan and others ... Appellants Versus M/s. Madhyabharat Phosphate P. Ltd. ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.10815 of 2012) State of Rajasthan and others ... Appellants Versus M/s. Liberty Phosphate Ltd. ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.10816 of 2012) State of Rajasthan and others ... Appellants Versus M/s. Asian Fertilizer Ltd. ...Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.14654 of 2012) State of Rajasthan and o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5253 OF2010Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited ... Appellant versus Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and others ... Respondents With Civil Appeal Nos. 951-952 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.3298 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.3299 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.4529 of 2005 Civil Appeal Nos. 5834-5836 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.5837 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.6049 of 2005 Civil Appeal No.802 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.2731 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.2794 of 2006 Civil Appeal No.3504 of 2006 Civil Appeal Nos. 4965-4966 of 2007 Civil Appeal No.177 of 2008 Civil Appeal Nos. 598-599 of 2008 Civil Appeal No.5184 of 2010 Civil Appeal No.5873 of 2010 Civil Appeal No.6068 of 2010 Civil Appeal No.6255 of 2010 Civil Appeal No.D28298 of 2010 T.C. (C) No.39 of 2010 Civil Appeal Nos. 271-281 of 2011 JUDGMENT G.S. SINGHVI, J.1. By an order dated 6.2.2007 passed in Civil Appeal No.3298 of 2005 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Authority) v. Bha...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION1CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2048 OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.9611 of 2012) Alsia Pardhi .... Appellant(s) Versus State of M.P. & Ors. .... Respondent(s) JUDGMENT P.Sathasivam, CJI.1) Leave granted.2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 09.04.2012 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Writ Petition No.3803 of 2011 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein.3) Brief facts: (a) On 10.02.2011, at about 4 p.m., a posse of forest officials of the Betul Range, District Betul, forcibly took away one Kusum, W/o Taarbabu Pardhi and Rajnandani, D/o Ankit Pardhi, aged about 14 years, from the fish market in their jeep. When the persons present at the site tried to resist the force of the forest officials, Kusum somehow managed to jump from the jeep but the minor girl Rajnandani was whisked away by them. (b) Alsia Pardhithe appe...
Tag this Judgment!