Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1991SC1805; [1991(63)FLR270]; JT1991(3)SC29; 1991(2)SCALE8; (1991)4SCC136; [1991]2SCR836; 1991(2)LC275(SC); (1991)2UPLBEC958
ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. B.P. Singh and nine other teachers employed in the schools run by the Ordnance Factories at Kanpur and Muradnagar, have filed this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging their retirement from service on attaining the age of 58 years. They claim that they are entitled to have the age of superannuation fixed at 60 years instead of 58 years. 2. Mr. O.P. Sharma, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, has contended that the age of superannuation of the teachers working in the schools controlled by various departments of Government of India other than the Defence Department has been enhanced to 60 years and according to him there is no justification to single-out the teachers working in the schools run by the Ordnance Factories under the control of the Defence Department of Government of India3. Mr. Sharma has relied upon a Memorandum issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Education dated September 6, 1983 by which the age o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 1992Supp(2)SCC130
K. Jagannatha Shetty Shetty and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. The only question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the relief granted by the Central Administrative Tribunal in favour of the respondent is in accordance with the judgment of this Court in Comptroller and Auditor General of India v. K.S. Jagannathan1. The relevant portion of the judgment reads: (SCC pp. 705-06, para 40)“For Part II examination of the Subordinate Accounts Service Examination (Ordinary)and all subsequent Part II examinations of the Subordinate Accounts Service Examination (Ordinary) held hereafter until today there will be a relaxation of 25 marks in all for candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, that is, this relaxation will cover not only the pass marks to be given in the aggregate but will be inclusive of the pass marks to be given in each individual paper so that the total number of marks covered by such relaxation will not exceed 25. The respondents a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 1991(2)Crimes855(SC); II(1991)DMC366SC; JT1991(1)SC33; (1991)3SCC451; [1991]2SCR821
P.B. Sawant, J.1. Leave is granted. Appeal is taken on board for final hearing by consent of parties.The 1st appellant and the Ist respondent were married at Tirupati on February 27, 1975. They separated in July 1978. The 1st appellant filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County Missouri, USA. The 1st respondent sent her reply from here under protest. The Circuit Court passed a decree for dissolution of marriage on February 19, 1980 in the absence of the Ist respondent.2. The 1st appellant had earlier filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in the sub-Court of Tirupati being O.P. No. 87/76. In that petition, the 1st appellant filed an application for dismissing the same as not pressed in view of the decree passed by the Missouri Court. On August 14, 1991 the learned sub-Judge of Tirupati dismissed the petition.3. On November 2. 1981, the 1st appellant married the 2nd appellant in Yadgirignita. Hence, 1st respondent filed a criminal complai...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 1991(2)Crimes842(SC); JT1991(3)SC63; 1991(2)SCALE29; (1991)3SCC562; [1991]2SCR839
B.C. Ray, J.1. Special leave granted. Arguments heard.2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated July 17, 1990 passed by the High Court of Orissa in Criminal Revision No. 382 of 1986 dismissing the revision and affirming the concurrent findings of the courts below. The prosecution case in short is that on 19th March, 1983 at about 7 p.m. while the victim girl Srimanthini Samal (P.W.2) was going to the house of Rama Samal, for study, the appellant Gagan informed her that the other appellant Prafulla and others had tied her tutor Rabi Babu in a nearby mango grove and her father was present there. Having believed the version of the appellant Gagan, her agnatic uncle, she accompanied him and ultimately the appellants forcibly took her to a lonely house in hills where she was made to sit on a chair and the appellant Gagan forcibly threshed in her mouth a liquor bottle and she was made to drink the liquor. Thereafter both the appellants after having undr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1992SC1618; 1992CriLJ2330; 1991(2)Crimes847(SC); JT1991(3)SC30; 1991(2)SCALE9; 1991Supp(2)SCC101; 1991(2)LC449(SC)
ORDERS. Ratnavel Pandian, J1. This Special Leave Petition is directed against the Order of the Designated Court, Delhi dated 3.6.91 rejecting the application for regular bail to Mool Chand Shah, the petitioner herein and in the alternative releasing him on interim bail.2. The petitioner is an accused in FIR No. 53 of 1991 of Chandni Mahal Police Station, Delhi registered under Sections 3 and 4 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and under Section 8(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act (FERA). The prosecution is as follows.3. The petitioner is an unauthorised dealer illegally dealing in foreign exchange-commonly known as Hawala transaction and he has been instrumental in transferring huge sums received from different sources to the members of militant outfits of Jammu and Kashmir for use in terrorist and disruptive activities. It is stated that on receipt of a secret information, a trap was laid by Delhi police on 25.3.1991 resulting in the app...
Tag this Judgment!