Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1987SC1399; JT1987(2)SC477; 1987LabIC995; (1988)ILLJ41SC; 1987(1)SCALE937; (1987)3SCC10; [1987]3SCR115
1. In these appeals by special leave and in the Special Leave Petition the dispute relates to the seniority of erstwhile Officers Grade-II and the Probationary/Trainee Officers in the Grade-I of the State Bank of India.2. In the lower level, the State Bank of India had two categories of officers, namely. Officers Grade-I and Officers Grade-II; the function of the former was managerial and that of the latter supervisory. The conditions of service of these two categories of officers were, admittedly, governed by the State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules, hereinafter referred to as 'the 1975 Rules'.3. The 1975 Rules were not framed under the rule making power of the Government, as conferred by Section 49 of the State Bank of India Act, but under Section 43 of the Act, Sub-section (1) of which provides that the State Bank may appoint such number of officers, advisers and employees as it considers necessary or desirable for the efficient performance of its functions, and det...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1987SC1550; JT1987(2)SC339; 1987(1)SCALE919; (1987)3SCC258; [1987]3SCR146; 1987(2)LC283(SC)
A.P. Sen, J.1. This is an application made by one T.V. Choudhary, a Member of the Indian Administrative Service, under suspension, for recalling the Court's orders dated May 5, 1986 and August, 11, 1986 passed in Special Leave Petition No. 14045 of 1985.2. We shall first deal with the Special Leave Petition of E.S. Reddy, a member of the Indian Administrative Service belonging to Andhra Pradesh cadre and who worked as the Vice-Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Andhra Pradesh Mining Corporation. It is directed against a judgment of the division Bench of the High Court dated October 18, 1985 reversing the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge dated September 2, 1985 and dismissing his petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. By the writ petition, the petitioner had called in question the validity of an order of the State Government of Andhra Pradesh dated February 11, 1985 placing him under suspension under Sub-rule(1) of Rule 13 of the Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Cl...
Tag this Judgment!