Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1952SC343; 1953CriLJ129; [1952]1SCR1091
Mahajan, J. 1. This is a consolidated appeal by special leave from the two orders of the High Court of Judicature at Nagpur passed on the 9th March, 1950, in Criminal Revisions Nos. 152 and 153 of 1949. 2. On a complaint filed by the Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Anti-Corruption Department, Nagpur, the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 56 of 1951 (H. G. Nargundkar, Excise Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh), and the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 1951 (R. S. Patel) were tried in the court of Shri B. K. Chaudhri, Special Magistrate, Nagpur, for the offence of conspiracy to secure the contract of Seoni Distillery from April, 1947, to March 1951 by forging the tender, Exhibit P-3A, and for commission of the offences of forgery of the tender (Exhibit P-3A) and of another document, Exhibit P-24. The learned Special Magistrate convicted both the appellants on all the three charges. He sentenced R. S. Patel to rigorous imprisonment for one year under each charge and to pay fines of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1953SC437
Chandrasekhara Aiyar, J.1. This appeal is before us by virtue of special leave granted.2. There was an order of the Government of India dated 21-2-1950 referring, under Clause (c) of Sub-section (1) of Section 10, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), an industrial dispute to the Industrial Tribunal at Calcutta for adjudication. This order refers to two prior orders of the Government of India dated 13-6-1947 and 20-9-1949, which had already referred certain disputes; but we are not concerned with those prior orders now.3. The relevant terms of the present order may be set out hereunder:'AND WHEREAS a further industrial dispute has arisen after 13-6-1949 or is apprehended between the banking companies mentioned in Schedule I annexed hereto and their employees in respect of matters specified in Schedule II hereto annexed: AND WHEREAS the Central Government considers it desirable to refer the further dispute for adjudication: NOW, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Cl...
Tag this Judgment!