Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2006)2GLR925
..... prakash chandra pathak v. state of uttar pradesh : air1960sc195 , explaining the value of precedents in criminal matters, the supreme court has made following amongst other observations in paragraph-8 of reported decision:decisions even of the highest court on questions which are essentially questions of fact, cannot be cited as precedents ..... as to whom the brown sugar was to be delivered. according to the learned additional public prosecutor, in the chargesheet itself, it is mentioned that two other accused namely: (i) khumansinh kesarsinh; and (ii) sumersinh were absconding, which would indicate that further investigation was undertaken by the investigating officer, and it ..... coffee coloured pant whereas another person had worn cream coloured lining shirt and biscuit coloured pant and was of sound physique. it may be mentioned that other particulars about two persons, who were to accompany rajendra sharma, were also given in the information. on receipt of information, pi mr. chudasama asked .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2007)2GLR1764
..... -2006, issued by respondent no. 1-committee is perused, insofar as respondent no. 2-institute is concerned, except for upholding the provisional admission of 2 other students in n.r.i. quota, no reasons are assigned whatsoever for rejecting the application of the petitioner. he, therefore, assailed the action of respondent no ..... provisional admission. that the petitioner having done everything that is required by the regulations for securing admission in n.r.i. quota, in absence of any other requirement, it was not open to respondent authorities to cancel the provisional admission, but it was incumbent upon the respondents to confirm the provisional admission in ..... and therefore, right at the stage of scrutiny, the petitioner was called upon to undertake an exercise, which was neither warranted by the regulation nor by any other law. however, to satisfy the authorities, the petitioner obtained an endorsement from the district court, surat, and presented the document and that is why respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!