Skip to content

Will Estate At - Judgment Search Results

Nov 04 2016

Hyacintia Real Estate Developers Private Limited vs.dlf Real Estate Bu ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-04-2016

Company).2. The Transferor companies No.1 to 6and the Transferee Company, will hereinafter collectively be referred to as the Applicants.3. The registered … in connection with the scheme of amalgamation of Hyacintia Real Estate Developers Private Limited ( hereinafter referred to as the Transferor


Jan 18 2007

Max Estates Limited and anr. Vs. Malsi Estates Limited

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-18-2007

Reported in: [2008]141CompCas341(P& H); (2007)146PLR395; [2008]86SCL219(Punj& Har)

the companies and share exchange ratio on 31.07.2006 and 31.03.2006 will remain same.9. Learned Counsel for the petitioner companies has relied … (hereinafter to be referred as 'the transferor company') and Malsi Estate Limited (hereinafter to be referred as 'the transferee company').2. Malsi


Nov 30 2010

Ajit Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Arvind Estates Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-30-2010

Petition 150/2010 Page 2 transferor company Nos. 1 to 4 will be dissolved from the effective date. This order will not … Company No.1), Nexus Realtors Private Limited (Transferor Company No.2), Mandarin Estates Private Limited (Transferor Company No.3), Charul Estates Private Limited (Transferor


Dec 07 2012

Pickadali Real Estate Pvt. Ltd, Delhi/Karnal Vs. Horizon Estates Priva ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-07-2012

OF 201.th DATE OF DECISION :7. DECEMBER, 2012 Pickadali Real Estate PVT.LTD.Delhi/Karnal …. Petitioner Versus Horizon Estates Private Limited, Delhi &


Jun 22 1990

Estate of Late Gen. Sir Shankar S.S.J.B. Rana Vs. Controller of Estate ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-22-1990

Reported in: 1990(3)BomCR36; (1990)87CTR(Bom)53; [1990]186ITR578(Bom)

less and that he was entitled to refund. The question will still be whether this awareness amounts or can in law … Rs. 13,69,092 payable to the deceased was includible in the estate of the deceased, though it was received, after the deceased's


Jan 31 1989

Estate of Kisandas Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-31-1989

Reported in: [1989]178ITR259(Mad)

the affirm ative and against the accountable person. The revenue will have the cost of this reference. Counsel's fee Rs. 500. … and that was included in the principal value of the estate without any bifurcation thereof into the money-lending in which it


Apr 19 1989

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late W.S. Seshachala Gramani

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-19-1989

Reported in: (1989)77CTR(Mad)246; [1989]180ITR431(Mad)

described in the schedule hereunder written, the settlor shall and will be bound to pay regularly to the Government, Corporation of … the instance of the Revenue, under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the


Dec 13 1990

Estate of Late S.V. Rajammal (by Accountable Person S.V. Venkatasubbu) ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-13-1990

Reported in: [1992]197ITR55(Mad)

C. No. 271 of 1980, the Controller of Estate Duty will be entitled to his costs. Counsel's fee Rs. 500. … the accountable person and others. Finally, the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty included all the properties in the dutiable estate of


Feb 11 1991

Kumari Estate Workers' Union, Nagercoil Vs. Modaile Easwari Estate, Po ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-11-1991

Reported in: (1991)IILLJ500Mad

quashed and the writ petition is allowed. The Labour Court will restore the case on its file and dispose of the … workers) from doing the tapping works in the 1st respondent estate, the Government cannot make a reference to the Labour Court


Jun 28 1995

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late T.S. Srinivasa Iyer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-28-1995

Reported in: [1996]218ITR129(Mad)

'the non-applicability of Section 22 of the Estate Duty Act will not automatically result in the charge being imposed under Section … date of his death. According to the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, since, in the present case, the gift was made


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial