Will Estate At - Judgment Search Results
Hyacintia Real Estate Developers Private Limited vs.dlf Real Estate Bu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-04-2016
Company).2. The Transferor companies No.1 to 6and the Transferee Company, will hereinafter collectively be referred to as the Applicants.3. The registered … in connection with the scheme of amalgamation of Hyacintia Real Estate Developers Private Limited ( hereinafter referred to as the Transferor
Max Estates Limited and anr. Vs. Malsi Estates Limited
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-18-2007
Reported in: [2008]141CompCas341(P& H); (2007)146PLR395; [2008]86SCL219(Punj& Har)
the companies and share exchange ratio on 31.07.2006 and 31.03.2006 will remain same.9. Learned Counsel for the petitioner companies has relied … (hereinafter to be referred as 'the transferor company') and Malsi Estate Limited (hereinafter to be referred as 'the transferee company').2. Malsi
Ajit Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Arvind Estates Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2010
Petition 150/2010 Page 2 transferor company Nos. 1 to 4 will be dissolved from the effective date. This order will not … Company No.1), Nexus Realtors Private Limited (Transferor Company No.2), Mandarin Estates Private Limited (Transferor Company No.3), Charul Estates Private Limited (Transferor
Pickadali Real Estate Pvt. Ltd, Delhi/Karnal Vs. Horizon Estates Priva ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-07-2012
OF 201.th DATE OF DECISION :7. DECEMBER, 2012 Pickadali Real Estate PVT.LTD.Delhi/Karnal …. Petitioner Versus Horizon Estates Private Limited, Delhi &
Estate of Late Gen. Sir Shankar S.S.J.B. Rana Vs. Controller of Estate ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-22-1990
Reported in: 1990(3)BomCR36; (1990)87CTR(Bom)53; [1990]186ITR578(Bom)
less and that he was entitled to refund. The question will still be whether this awareness amounts or can in law … Rs. 13,69,092 payable to the deceased was includible in the estate of the deceased, though it was received, after the deceased's
Estate of Kisandas Vs. Controller of Estate Duty
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-1989
Reported in: [1989]178ITR259(Mad)
the affirm ative and against the accountable person. The revenue will have the cost of this reference. Counsel's fee Rs. 500. … and that was included in the principal value of the estate without any bifurcation thereof into the money-lending in which it
Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late W.S. Seshachala Gramani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-19-1989
Reported in: (1989)77CTR(Mad)246; [1989]180ITR431(Mad)
described in the schedule hereunder written, the settlor shall and will be bound to pay regularly to the Government, Corporation of … the instance of the Revenue, under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the
Estate of Late S.V. Rajammal (by Accountable Person S.V. Venkatasubbu) ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-13-1990
Reported in: [1992]197ITR55(Mad)
C. No. 271 of 1980, the Controller of Estate Duty will be entitled to his costs. Counsel's fee Rs. 500. … the accountable person and others. Finally, the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty included all the properties in the dutiable estate of
Kumari Estate Workers' Union, Nagercoil Vs. Modaile Easwari Estate, Po ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-1991
Reported in: (1991)IILLJ500Mad
quashed and the writ petition is allowed. The Labour Court will restore the case on its file and dispose of the … workers) from doing the tapping works in the 1st respondent estate, the Government cannot make a reference to the Labour Court
Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late T.S. Srinivasa Iyer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-28-1995
Reported in: [1996]218ITR129(Mad)
'the non-applicability of Section 22 of the Estate Duty Act will not automatically result in the charge being imposed under Section … date of his death. According to the Assistant Controller of Estate Duty, since, in the present case, the gift was made
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »