Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 5a constitution of the national board for wild life Page 7 of about 188 results (0.132 seconds)

Kamla Kant Pandey S/O Shri Lalji Pandey Vs. State of U.P. Through Secr ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2006All92; 2006(2)AWC1503

..... 1828.79 hectare of village' pakri (district mirzapur) as reserved forest. thereafter on 10.8.1982 a notification under section 18(1) of the wild life protection act, 1972 was issued constituting kaimur wild life sanctuary consisting of several van blocks. an area of 921.8 hectare of kanach van block and an area of 1406,7 hectares of pakri van ..... question of granting permission to the petitioner for doing mining operations in accordance with the provisions of section 29 of wild life (protection ) act. his contention was that there has been reference of section 29 of the above act in the order passed by the secretary but no specific finding has been recorded on this point and the order ..... however, the writ petition is allowed to this extent that the matter of grant of permission to the petitioner under section 29 of the wild life (protection ) act is remitted to the government for reconsideration in the light of the observations made in the body of the judgment with a further direction that .....

Om Prakash Choudhary and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2005Raj18; RLW2005(1)Raj167; 2004(4)WLC388

..... has been raised in the administrative area where other buildings are already existing. it was canvassed that neither any provision of the wild life protection act, 1972 nor forest (conservation) act, 1980 have been violated by the construction of the interpretation center. it was also contended that the construction of the new interpretation ..... for the improvement of the habitat. the chief wild life warden is the only competent authority under section 33 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and the permission of the central government is not required. in spite of the fact that the chief wild life warden is the competent authority approval for construction of ..... is required for constructing interpretation center, the position can also be examined with reference to section 33 of the wildlife (protection) act, 1972. section 33 reads as follows :'the chief wild life warden shall be the authority who shall control, manage and maintain all sanctuaries and for that purpose, within the limits .....

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Forest an ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2005Mad304

..... the impugned notification dated 11.07.2001. in our opinion, the interpretation which we are taking will be in consonance with the aims and objects of the wild life protection act. as already stated above, heydon's rule of interpretation (the mischief rule) has to be applied in this case, and we have to see the mischief ..... 2001 issued by the first respondent, union of india, represented by its secretary, ministry of environment and forests, new delhi. by that notification, the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') has been amended by including various species to the schedule. the species with which we are concerned are as follows: -' part iv a - ..... sought to be rectified by the law. that mischief is stated in the statement of objects and reasons of the wild life protection act, 1972.40. the statement of objects and reasons state: -' the rapid decline of india's wild animals and birds, one of the richest and most varied in the world, has been a cause of grave .....

Moti Lal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2086

..... respect of offences under fera.7. the analysis of the provisions referred to by the learned counsel for the petitioner do not at all show that wild life (protection) act is a special law which may contain complete provisions for investigation, inquiry, search, seizure and trial and, therefore, ratio of the authority cited by ..... ca-5 to the counter-affidavit. these notifications show that the central bureau of investigation is empowered to investigate an offence under section 51 of the wild life (protection) act and its powers have been extended for investigating the offence in question namely, case crime no. 915 of 1999 of p.s. sahibabad district ghaziabad ..... .s.p.e. acton 24-1-1996 whereunder delhi special police establishment has been empowered to investigate the offences punishable under section 51 of the wild life (protection) act and also attempts, abetments and conspiracies in relation to or in connection with the aforesaid offence and any other offence or offences committed in the .....

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Commissioner and Secretary to Gov ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(1)CTC513

..... listed for hearing, a petition has been filed for raising additional ground to the following effect:the suit is barred by section 60 of the wild life protection act since the actions complained of by the plaintiff as against the defendant/state government are all one which have been taken in good faith under the powers ..... of the wild life protection act, 1972 and hence the state government and its officers have an immunity from being sued.10. a counter affidavit has been filed by the plaintiff ..... state government approved the proposal of the chief conservator of forests to notify kalkakadu reserve forest as sanctuary for wild life and accordingly a notification under section 18(1) of the wild life protection act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act) was issued declaring its intention to constitute the said forest as wildlife sanctuary. on 14.11.1976, as .....

Chandmari Tea Co. and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... without any interference.4. petitioners' grievance is that by notification dated 13-6-85 issued by the respondent no. 6 under section 35 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for short 'the act, 1972') the govt. incorporated certain areas of kanchanguri village measuring about 89.754 hectors into the kaziranga national park. though as per the said ..... . however, rights of any kind may be allowed to be continued as per section 24(2)(c) ofthe wild life (protection) amendment act, 1991 with the consultation with the chief wild life warden.23. section 19 of the act, 1972 has also been amended vide gazette of india publication dated 20-9-91 to the effect that the ..... is seen that the publication of the notification and the addition of the areas to the kaziranga national! park and burachapori sanctuary were necessary for protection of the wild life and also to improve environment and to safeguard the forest of the country. while adding the areas in question to the national park/sanctuary in .....

M. Muthuramalingam and Etc. Etc. Vs. District Forest Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2002CriLJ420

..... the petitioners were only on their voluntary confession and the same had been done in compliance with the procedures as contemplated under the tamil nadu forest act and the wild life protection act and as such, the proceedings cannot be said to be illegal.8. the learned government advocate would also incidently refer to the decision of the ..... from any person reasonably suspected of having committed any forest offence by way of compensation, while compounding the said offence.19. as per section 54 of the wild life protection act, 1972, the offence can be compounded by any officer, who is empowered to do so by the notification issued by the central government. in this case, ..... , in view of the fact that there are no materials to show that the petitioners have committed any offence either under the tamil nadu forest act or under the wild life protection act.32. this contention also, in my view, would be untenable. the case had been registered when they were caught red handed with the weapons .....

State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. Vs. Smt. Halli Devi

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2000HP113

..... to the dependants of the person killed by the wild animals as defined under wild life (protection) act, 1972. providing of such reliefs would not tantamount to admission of liability.27. in order to succeed in claiming damages under the tortious ..... attacked by a bear and had sustained the injuries. they however, denied their liability for the damages. they also admitted that killing of wild animals is prohibited under wild life (protection) act, 1972. they denied that the black bear was let loose by them. various legal objections as to the maintainability of the suit, absence ..... 26. there is no force in the contention of the learned counsel for the plaintiff. there is no provision under the wild life (protection) act, 1972, for providing of reliefs to a victim of wild animal. under the scheme ex. db, the state government decided to grant gratuitous relief to the persons sustaining injuries or .....

Madhukar Rao Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(2)MPHT445; 2000(1)MPLJ289

..... as a result of deletion of sub-section (2) of section 50 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and as an effect of the provisions of section 39(1)(d) of the said act, there exists no power with the authorities under the act of the code to release any vehicle used in the course of alleged commission of ..... him.'6. sub-section (2) of the said section has been omitted by amendment act no. 44 of 1991. original section prior to amendment reads as under :--'(2) any officer of a rank not inferior to that of an assistant director of wild life preservation or wild life warden, who, or whose sub-ordinate, has seized any trap, tool, vehicle, ..... well as individuals now can also file complaints in the courts for offences under the act. it is also proposed to provide for appointment of honorary wild life wardens and payment of rewards to persons helping in apprehension of offenders.' 4. section 2 of the act contains 'definition clauses'. sub-clause (14) defines 'government property'. it means any .....

Maheshkumar Virjibhai Trivedi and 20 ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR2006Guj35; (2006)2GLR1066

..... declared in the year 1973 and as per provisions of section-20 of the wild life protection act, 1972, after issue of notification under section-18, no right shall be acquired in, on or over the land comprised within the limits of area specified in ..... dated 17.1.2001 refusing to recognize the rights of the petitioners in the land in question as their rights were after notification under section-18 of the wild life protection act declaring the intention, means, after declaration of the sanctuary. it is required to be noted that the necessary entry with regard to the said order is ..... delay and laches. even otherwise, it is required to be noted that so far as the lands in question is concerned, it is wild ass sanctuary declared under the provisions of the wild life protection act, 1972 and necessary notifications are already issued since long. it is also required to be noted that the intention for sanctuary was already .....