Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38k definitions Court: orissa Page 21 of about 637 results (1.402 seconds)

Karnam Laxmipati Padmini Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1993CriLJ219; 1992(I)OLR262

..... power to grant interim release of the goods seized. he was, however, not right in treating the application filed by the petitioners under section 56 (3) of the act. the application could only be considered by him under section 451 or section 457 of the cr.p.c. however, erroneous mention of the statutory provisions in the ..... andhra pradesh v. smt. haji begum and anr.) held that the power to pass orders regarding release of the seized property lies with the authorities under the forest act and not in a court by invoking the provisions of the code of criminal procedure. this court observed that when any forest produce together with the vehicle used in ..... released them on bail. he submitted a prosecution report in the court of the sub-divisional judicial magistrate, bhubaneswar. (sdjm) under section 45 of the orissa forest act, 1972 (for short, 'the act') and rule 4 of the orissa timber and other forest produce transit rules, 1980 (for short 'the rules'). the case was registered as 2(b) c .....

Shri Gagan Behari Pradhan Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2006(1)OLR31

..... , therefore, could not be considered. further, it has been mentioned that the merit list dated 21.5.1997 was to remain valid for one year only, meaning thereby that the life of the select list would have come to an end on 21.5.1998. but the finance department vide their letter no.11172, dated 20.3.1998 imposed ban on ..... select list could not have been treated to have come to an end. the period for which the ban order was imposed was liable to be excluded from the life of the select list as it was not possible to act upon the select list, though selected candidates were available, due to ban order. therefore, we are of the view that the ..... life of the select list would be counted excluding the period for which the ban order was imposed. the case of the petitioner for appointment was to be considered immediately after .....

Satyasai Nayak Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4574

..... junagarh, dharamgarh and nuapada towns in which the students and members of the organisations have demanded drastic action against you and arrest of your two other associates, protection of girl students, police patrolling in college and school areas etc....this incident has been highlighted in different newspapers.... this incident has created a sense of fear psychosis ..... of society and undoubtedly causes fear and panic in the minds of the public at large and disturbs or affects the even tempo of life of the community, then such an act can be basis of an order of detention....after discussing the fact situation and the grounds on which the order of detention was passed ..... road with burning head/face, left side neck and left side breast. after observing your heinous crime in busy locality in broad day light the entire public life in and around the scene of crime was disrupted. people ran helter and skelter to save themselves. all the shopkeepers in the locality downed their shutters in .....

Nirmal Chandra Dash Vs. Smt.Janaki Dash @ Panda and Others

Court : Orissa

..... with another lady she was forcibly driven out of the matrimonial house for which she had to take shelter in her father s house where she is leading a life of destitute having no means to maintain her and accordingly she prayed that the petitioner s suit be dismissed with cost.8. santosh kumar dash the alleged adulterer ..... tolerating the torture meted out to her as a hindu orthodox brahmin lady. it is further alleged that the opposite party was a wreckless person and leading an amorous life to which when the petitioner protested she was severely assaulted and ultimately the opposite party drove her out of the house in the month of august, 1999 for ..... amount to denial of legitimate protection of marital rights. proof of actual adultery is not necessary and circumstantial evidence which lends to an inference of adultery is sufficient. the degree of proof need not reach certainty but it must carry a high degree of probability.11. section 13 (1) (i) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 was amended in .....

Nirmal Chandra Dash Vs. Smt. Janaki Dash @ Panda and Others

Court : Orissa

..... with another lady she was forcibly driven out of the matrimonial house for which she had to take shelter in her father s house where she is leading a life of destitute having no means to maintain her and accordingly she prayed that the petitioner s suit be dismissed with cost.8. santosh kumar dash the alleged adulterer ..... tolerating the torture meted out to her as a hindu orthodox brahmin lady. it is further alleged that the opposite party was a wreckless person and leading an amorous life to which when the petitioner protested she was severely assaulted and ultimately the opposite party drove her out of the house in the month of august, 1999 for ..... amount to denial of legitimate protection of marital rights. proof of actual adultery is not necessary and circumstantial evidence which lends to an inference of adultery is sufficient. the degree of proof need not reach certainty but it must carry a high degree of probability.11. section 13 (1) (i) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 was amended in .....

Prafulla Kumar Samal Vs. Union of India

Court : Orissa

..... of rs. 6,968/was reimbursed by the railway authorities. on account of physical disability, the appellant was taken out of employment as a constable in the railway protection force and was accommodated in an inferior post of care taker carrying less salary, perks, privileges and promotional prospectus. the appellant thereafter filed a claim petition, being o ..... of part iii of the schedule to these rules. though this is too little a compensation for the disablement with which he will spend the rest of his life that is all that is admissible to him under law. we find that he is a matriculate and was working as a constable which comes under group c ..... .a. no.37 of 1998, under the provisions of railways act, 1989, as amended before the railway claims tribunal, 3 bhubaneswar bench, bhubaneswar claiming compensation of rs. 3,20,000/- as provided in item no.17 of part- .....

The State (at the Instance of the S.D.M. Titiagarh) Vs. the Editor, Pr ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1955Ori36; 1955CriLJ547

..... court of india and the high courts are the courts of record, and it is essential for the administration of justice and protection of individuals that the courts should be able to punish summarily acts of contempt, because in the words of blackstone 'this power is an inseparable attendant upon every superior tribunal.' 8. mr. ..... or the other, such publication is bound to react on the minds of the witnesses and jurors. if such publications emanate from persons exercising high influence in public life, they may, in certain circumstances, also overawe the magistracy. therefore, in our opinion, the publications by a person with the knowledge that a proceeding is imminent ..... lordship, the right of freedom of speech was only subject to the fourteenth amendment of the constitution which provides that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of the law. his lordship further pointed out that in the case before them there was no direction by the legislature .....

Bira Naik and anr. Vs. Mahanta Sidhakamal Nayan Ramanuj Das

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1951Ori300

..... mtgee had special advantage by reason of his position as mtgee. in acquiring them. in the madras case, it was pointed out that section 90, trusts act, affords protection against the mortgaged properties being gold at a disadvantage & prevents certain persons from taking advantage of their position to secure a benefit to themselves in derogation of ..... a mtgea. has now been embodied by schedule 0, trusts act, 1882, in a wider rule dealing with acquisition by tenants for life, co-owner, mtgees & other qualified owners. it was argued before the board that section 63, t. p. act, goes farther than section 90, trusts act, & that the mtgor, would the entitled to treat subordinate ..... the mtgee. which are in the nature of a trust. chapter ix of the indian trust act deals with certain obligations in the nature of a trust & section 90 provides against any advantage gained by qualified owners such as, tenant for life, co-owner, mtgee. & the like. the conditions under which the advantage gained by such .....

Subarna Bissoiani Vs. Arjuno Bissoi

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1951Ori337

..... itself that she was driven away by krishno within about three months of her marriage with him & also that krishno had died since (prior to her coming under the protection of bhagaban, see evidence of p. w.5). it is not shown that; in this caste the remarriage of a divorced woman or of a widow is prohibited ..... is nothing more than mere opinion which, to be admissible, must be the opinion of persons having special means of knowledge & expressed by conduct according to schedule 0, evidence act. further it is doubtful whether under that section, evidence of non-existence of relationship is admissible. (see the instructive judgment in chandulal v. bibi rhatemonnessa, a. i. r ..... son, the exeroutant of the document, being dead, his statement that the deft, is his legally married wife, is clearly admissible under section 82, cl (5), evidence act. it is not suggested that there was any dispute at the time with reference to which the pltf.'s son made a tendentious statement in favour of the deft. this .....

Dolgobinda Rath Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1958Ori224; 1958CriLJ1211

..... . 3, at the earlier stage had stated that she was driven out of the house by her mother, but that does notmean that she had permanently went out of the protection of her guardians.reliance was sought to be placed on a case reported in r.w. valliant v. h. eleazer, air 1926 cal 407 (b), where the learned judges held ..... however, the fact being that the age of the girl was not more than 14 years even the consent of the girl does not make any material difference and the act of co-habitation would constitute the offence under section 375, indian penal code. some argument was sought to be advanced that p.w. 3 did not say anything about the ..... is no doubt a surer test for determining age. but i am not aware of any such tests having been conducted anywhere in india, particularly in orissa. nonetheless courts have acted on the opinion of the doctors, arrived at without conducting any ossification tests and based on other factors as indicated above.'i respectfully agree with the above decision and hold .....