Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38k definitions Court: chennai Page 10 of about 842 results (0.276 seconds)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Madurai Pandian Engineering Corporation ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1999]239ITR375(Mad)

..... [1981] 151 itr 636. it was held by the delhi high court in that case that retreading of worn out tyres to give it a new lease of life is an industrial process, and that activity of processing amounts to an industrial or manufacturing activity. it was held that for all practical purposes and in the commercial sense ..... establishment of industrial undertakings in backward areas and that object will not be well served unless a liberal interpretation is given to the terms used in the provisions of the act, which confer benefits to new industrial undertakings. counsel referred to the decision of the apex court in the case of bajaj tempo ltd. v. cit : [1992]196itr188 ..... products and residual products which emerge in the course of manufacture of goods. regarding the word 'articles', the court observed 'the word is not defined in the act or the rules. it must, therefore, be understood in its normal connotation--the sense in which it is understood in the commercial world. it is equally well to .....

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Adar Tea Products Company

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Mad)597; [2009]314ITR38(Mad); [2009]178TAXMAN126(Mad)

..... . in the same table, the words 'ventilator used with anesthesia apparatus' and the words 'ventilators other than those used with anesthesia' are used with reference to 'life saving...being...'. if we have to treat 'being' as like or including, then it was not necessary to specifically mention 'ventilators used with anesthesia apparatus' and ' ..... claimed depreciation at 100% on fluid bed drier for the assessment year 1994-95. it was allowed. the notice under section 154 of the income tax act, 1961 ('act' in short) was issued calling for the assessee's objection for withdrawal of the 100% depreciation. the assessee objected to the disallowance. the objections were ..... 114itr802(mad) [commissioner of income-tax v. arasan fertilisers (p) ltd.], the word used was 'namely'. in item 13 of the fifth schedule to the income tax act, after the word 'fertilizers', the word 'namely' was introduced. our court held that 'namely' would restrict the interpretation of the word to those types of fertilizers that .....

R. Prabhakar and Another Vs. Dr. V. Jothilakshmi

Court : Chennai

..... considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ix metropolitan magistrate has held that the respondent herein is not entitled to protection under section 18 of domestic violence act since the revision petitioners herein had not caused any domestic violence towards the respondent herein viz., dr.v.jothilakshmi . the learned magistrate ..... which, the respondent's gold jewellery were pledged for rs.3,00,000/- towards construction costs. the first petitioner's sister, viz., dr.priya's married life was not a happy one, therefore, she became jealous and joined with her mother, viz., the second petitioner herein and started harassment. the respondent had contributed ..... respect of her occupation, income and being owner of property. hence, she is always rejecting the fact that the first petitioner should lead a happy married life; with these traits in her, she left the matrimonial home after collecting all her belongings. on one occasion, the respondent lodged a false complaint before .....

S. Jayakumari and Others Vs. Madras Medical Mission, Hospital Research ...

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

..... and rs.10,00,000/- towards mental agony, loss of consortium and parental love and affection are all concerned since the complaint is filed under the consumer protection act, 1986 we cannot grant those amounts like civil court except to grant compensation for the negligence and deficiency of service. the patient was in the hospital for ..... loss of income and to pay rs.25,000/- towards costs.) a.k. annamalai, presiding judicial member complaint filed under section 12 and 17 of the consumer protection act 1986. 2. the complainant claiming directions for the payment of rs.3,00,000/- towards the medical expenses and for rs.10,00,000/- towards compensation for ..... and not having any defect in the function of renal and thereby the 1st complainant lost their bred winner husband and affection of marital life of the complainants future prospectus of the life, filed this consumer complaint claiming the reliefs as above. 4. the opposite party filed their written version by denying the allegations of the .....

M/S. Appu Hotels Limited Vs. M/S. Ion Exchange Services Ltd.

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

..... stood over till this day for consideration, this commission made the following order.) a.k. annamalai, presiding member judicial 1. the complaint filed under section 17 of the consumer protection act- 1986 : complainant is a 5 star hotel having his brand name lee royal meridian, chennai and in the hotel premises at no.1, gst road, saint thomas mount ..... which among other details in para 6 it was mentioned as already suggested the complainant failed to replace the membrane as they have already completed 3 years of life span and it is specifically mentioned that 3 persons were delay deputed for having operated and maintained the r.o plant as per the terms and conditions of ..... and from the documents of opposite party concerned it is clear that the complainant has not come forward to replace the spare parts like pressure tube, change of expired life of the membrane and to provide necessary feed of water to the level of the expectation required to give out put with standard out come of water. 9. .....

O.A. Varadadesigan Vs. M/S. Vayjayanthi and Another

Court : Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

..... complainants as a representative of the complainants in cc.72/2010 and 73/2010 the district forum observed that the complainant is not a consumer under the consumer protection act and as such the complaint was rejected as not maintainable. 6. the appellants contention is that for the beneficiaries of complainant mrs.p.v.rama and vyajayanthi ..... them one p.g.venkataramani has given undertaking letter on the basis of it the complainant / appellant filed a complaint directing for such payment as a relief under consumer protection act, 1986 before the district forum. in view of the provisions under sec.2 (1) (b) sub clause iv and (c) stated that he cannot be considered ..... conducted two consumer complaints in cc.no.72/2010 and cc.no.73/2010 on behalf of the complainants who are respondents in this appeal against one aviva life insurance, chennai and after having the award in favour of the complainants against which the appeals were also filed which were also conducted on behalf of the .....

Prakash Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Erode

Court : Chennai

..... offence punishable under section 506(ii) of ipc. 20. now, turning to the quantum of punishment, the trial court has imposed imprisonment for life under section 6 of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012. the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that it is excessive. the accused is a young man aged 24 years. he ..... trial court, by judgement dated 09.04.2014, convicted him under sections 5(i) r/w 6 of the protection of children from sexual offences act and section 506(ii) of ipc and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of rs.5,000/- and also to pay a sum of rs.3,00,000/- in ..... 1) the conviction of the appellant for offence under sections 6 of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 is hereby confirmed. however, the substantive sentence of imprisonment for life imposed by the trial court under section 6 of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 is reduced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years. the fine of rs .....

Gonela Krishnamurthy and anr. Vs. Kalidindi Venkateswaran (Died) and o ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1952Mad11; (1951)2MLJ366

..... good" e. g. for securing the objects referred to in clauses (b) to (c) of article 39.26. the point for determination is whether act iv of 1938 under the guise of protecting public interests places arbitrary restrictions or reasonable restrictions upon acquiring, holding and disposing of property. in chintaman rao v. the state of madhya pradesh, the phrase ..... think themselves for it because they cannot have the bast of both worlds, namely, be an agriculturist and at the same time enjoy all the amenities of urban life also. no legislature can frame definitions which in its practical working would not develop isolated flaws or reveal loop holes; for as the english proverb haa it, we ..... illustration of the principle, if the criminal law provides for the punishment of an offence any person who is guilty of the offence irrespective of his position in life or his wealth or influence will be liable to be punished in the same way as any other person guilty of the same offence. no doubt the punishment .....

Trustees of the Port of Madras Vs. Home Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1970Mad48

..... . smith, (1941) 1 all er 66 at pp. 70, 72 and 76, the question was whether the english public authorities protection act, 1893, would protect the managers of a non-provided school who were found to be a public authority under the act, from an action for damages by an invitee to an exhibition in the school, who was injured through the collapse of ..... on for the benefit of the public within the statutory powers, the applicability of the public authorities protection ordinance which is similar to the language to the english public authorities protection act was considered. true the relevant sections in the english public authorities protection act, 1895 and the singapore ports ordinance specifically contemplate protection even in respect of neglect or default in the execution of any .....

Viravan Chettiar, Represented by Ramasami Chettiar Vs. Srinivasacharia ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1921Mad168; (1921)40MLJ481

..... deceased, not only by succession, but under any title whatsoever. if the cases of assignment from the deceased's legal representatives were excluded, evasion of the act would be easy and the protection afforded to the debtor would be illusory. this question must be answered in the negative.3. it is then conceded that the plaintiff must obtain a ..... the exclusion of a divided son. the imperfect right of sons in self-acquisitions of their father which is incapable of being enforced in law during the father's life-time was thought to be sufficient on his death to create a co-parcenery so as to attract the rule of survivorship. with all respect it seems to ..... debt in such cases would therefore be a debt in which no other person had an interest during the creditor's life-time and it is difficult to see how the provisions of section 4, of the succession certificate act are inapplicable. the current of authority is in favour of the view that succession certificate is necessary.7. in venkatramana .....