Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38c functions of the authority Page 6 of about 2,526 results (5.125 seconds)

Satyapal Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2004Jhar69; [2003(4)JCR481(Jhr)]

..... and other minerals does not in any way affect the interest of labourers. the advocate general submitted that in the given situation, the authority concerned under the wild life (protection) act, has issued the present notification/order. he pointed out that it is not as if this is the only viable route. there is another route, ..... according to the petitioner, there was no justification in preventing movement of the vehicles as has been done by issuance of the said notification under the wild life (protection) act. he has also submitted that the action of preventing movement of vehicles through the said road has badly affected the people of the area and such ..... environment, the notification has been issued under section 33(b) and section 35(8) of the wild life (protection) act, 1972. it is also submitted that plying of heavily loaded vehicles through the area has caused serious threat to wild life and has restricted the movement of animals since plying of vehicles used to produce a lot of .....

Nilambar Sahu and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2004(2)BLJR1136; [2004(2)JCR178(Jhr)]

..... the rajasthan wild life animals and birds protection act, 1951 and the provisions of wild life (protection) act, 1972 observed :'the purpose of the notification declaring the area as a game reserve under the rajasthan wild animals and birds protection act, 1951; or the declaration of the area as a sanctuary under the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and ..... to go through the marine national park and sanctuary be permitted. the supreme court interpreting various provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 the forest (conservation) act, 1980 and environment (protection) act, 1986, held :'the pivotal issue, as we have already noticed, is the interpretation of section 29 of ..... that carrying on mining activities on the land which falls within the forest area and declared as wild life sanctuary will be against the provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, forest (conservation) act, 1980 and the mandate issued by the supreme court in catena of decisions including decisions referred .....

Rajendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1998Raj165; 1998(1)WLC277

..... indian craftsmen for their livelihood. the petitioner has traced out the history of wild life protection, staling there firstly the animal protection act of 1912 was promulgated which merely concerned to prevent the killing of wild birds and animals and later on for a comprehensive and practical legislation to protect the indian wild life, the present wild life (protection) act, 1972 was enacted with the statement of objects inter alia as under:'the ..... has been reflected in the statement of objects and reasons of the amendment bill as under:--'the wild life (protection) act. 1972 provides for the protection of wild animals and birds.2. in the implementation of the act over 18 years, the need for amendment of certain provisions of the act to bring them in line with the requirements of the present limes has been fell. the indian .....

Tarun Bharat Sangh, Alwar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC514; 1992Supp(2)SCC448

..... declaring the area as a game reserve under the rajasthan wild animals and birds protection act, 1951; or the declaration of the area as a sanctuary under the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and the notification dated 1-1-1975 declaring the area as a protected forest under the rajasthan forest act, 1953 is to protect the forest wealth and wild life of the area. it is, indeed, odd that the state ..... area is also notified pursuant to the notification dated 1-1-1975, under sections 29 and 30 of the rajasthan forest act, 1953, as a reserved forest. the area is again declared as a sanctuary under section 35 of the wild life protection act, 1972. the direct effect of these, it is averred, is to impose restrictions on the carrying on of any activity in .....

Magarahole Budakattu Hakku Sthapana Samithi and Others Vs. State of Ka ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1997Kant288

..... respondent company by way of lessee or otherwise was legally permissible under the provisions of (i) the wild life (protection) act, and/or (ii) the forest conservation act.re: wildlife (protection) act, 197213. let me first refer untie relevant provisions of wild life (protection) act. this act has been enacted by the parliament for protection of wild animals, birds and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental thereto. clause 21 of sec. 2 ..... of lease hold rights has been assailed by the petitioners on the ground that the same has been made in flagrantviolation of the statutory restrictions contained in the wild life protection act. 1972, and the forest (conservation) act. 1980. the propriety of the transaction has been questioned keeping in view the larger interest of the tribals residing in the forest and the apprehension that the .....

Jagmohan @ Mohar Singh Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT522; 2001(59)DRJ746

..... of detention of jai chand namely dd no.28/2000 ps darya ganj, dd no.26-a/2000 ps darya ganj, dd no.15-a/2000 ps darya ganj under wild life protection act, 1972. petitioner was involved in the case of killing of pawan gulati with fire arm on 19th august, 1996 for which case fir no.853/96 under section 392 ..... bad.the activities of the petitioner were such which affected the tempo of the society.as already pointed out above when the petitioner was arrested he was found violating the wild life act as he was wearing a necklace studded with tiger nail.he was also in possession of mobile phones, cash, blank signed cheques, two undated signed stamp papers.these documents ..... a necklace studded with tiger nail which was in blatant disregard of the law.he thus created an atmosphere of terror and fear in the area and made the life of the people difficult to live in peace.his criminal activities thus were prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.21. mr.harjinder singh contended that facts of fir .....

Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC7; 2007(148)LC7(Delhi); 2009(235)ELT60(Del)

..... this clandestine trade is abetted by illegal practices of poaching which have taken a heavy toll of our wild animals and birds. the stocks declared by the traders at the commencement of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 are still used as a cover for such illicit trade. attempts to acquire the declared stocks of ..... has a direct bearing on the issue involved in the present writ petition and reads as follows:amendment act 28 of 1986 - statement of objects and reasons - the wild life (protection) act 28 of 1972 provides for the protection of wild animals and birds and for matters connected therewith or ancillary thereto. 2. under the scheme of the ..... act, trade or commerce in wild animals, animal articles and trophies within the country is permissible and is regulated .....

Biresh Kumar Singh Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... of state until and unless there is trial and finding reached by the competent court that the property was used for committing an offence under wild life (protection) act, therefore, the impugned order be set aside and the aforesaid vehicle be ordered to be released on supurdginama. learned counsel for the applicant ..... different than the instant case. in that case, the offences were registered under wild life protection act. in that case, the main question for consideration was that whether withdrawal of power of interim relief conferred on authorities under the act (wild life protection act) can be construed as taking away such power of magistrate as criminal court ..... 2013 against the driver for the offence punishable under sections 27, 29, 39 and 51 of the wild life (protection) act alleging that he was unauthorisedly transporting the sand from the protected area, i.e., son ghariya wild life sanctuary, sidhi. the vehicle was seized by the police and officer of forest department. since the .....

All India Mobile Zoo Owners and Animal Welfare Association Vs. U.O.i a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2000Delhi449

..... also explains that as regard animals, the possession and holding of which was not illegal under the wild life (protection) act, 1972, but were surrendered to the authorities, the petitioner may submit its claim to the chief life warden of the respective states for compensation giving their respective values. learned counsel for the petitioner submits ..... of ex-gratia compensation as well as for compensation for the animals, which were surrendered but holding and possession of which were not prohibited under the wild life act. the writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.8. the above order will also dispose of connected writ petition bearing nos. 2531/95 ..... learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the challenge to the order, rejecting the recognition of their mobile zoos under section 38(h) of the wild life act, had failed, petitioners were left with no other alternative but to surrender the animals. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this has been so .....

Dr. T. Patanjali Sastry, President, Environment Centre Vs. Chairman, A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALT315

..... habitations and their maintenances by providing sufficient number of vents for the roads existing at the time of notification of kolleru wild life sanctuary u/s 18 of wild life (protection) act, 1972 without permitting new roads and culverts;(7) right to maintain existing water courses and drains necessary to avert submersion ..... of notification, fishing in traditional method is permitted without causing environment hazard till the government acquires such private lands under the provisions of the wild life protection act. the right to do traditional agriculture without using pesticides and chemicals is also permitted. the encroachment activities are directed to be removed forthwith. ..... society, sanjaya gandi fishermen co-operative society, srungavarappadu of krishna district will be cancelled. the claimants are not entitled to any compensation under wild life (protection) act, 1972 as they were assigned the lands by the government on free of land value;(11) d-form pattas to the extent of ac .....