Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38c functions of the authority Page 13 of about 2,526 results (0.105 seconds)

Ningombam Ranjit Singh and anr. Vs. Smt. Yumnam Premila Devi

Court : Guwahati

..... only be taken by the court only on the complaint of a statutory officers i.e. officers mentioned in section 55 of the wild life protection act, 1972, the magistrate could take cognizance of an offence for the said offence on the complaint made by the said statutory officers even if the police officer is ..... the language employed in sub-section (4). it is apparent that if the facts reported to the police disclose both cognizable and non-cognizable offences, the police would be acting within the scope of its authority in investigating both the offences as the legal fiction enacted in sub-section (4) provides that even a non cognizable case shall, in ..... was not empowered to investigate the offence. the enquiry was an integrated one, being based on the same set of facts. even if the offence under the essential commodities act may be cognizable, the police officer would be competent to include it in the charge-sheet under section 173 with respect to a cognizable offence. in ram krishna v. .....

Ratansi Mulji Vs. Vinod Ratilal Gandhi and Another

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2766

..... in the case of state of bihar v. murad ali khan : 1989crilj1005 . in that case, the supreme court was concerned with an offence under the wild life (protection) act, 1972, which the high court had quashed on the ground that the quality of evidence before the trial court was such that it was unlikely to result ..... properly may be put to jeopardy for nothing. the liberty and property of any individual are sacred and sacrosanct and the court zealously guards them and protects them.'it very clearly emerges from this decision that in an appropriate case, the high court would be justified in interfering even at the stage of investigation ..... is set out in balck's law dictionary, fifth edition, page 865, which is as follows :-- 'management -- government, control, superintendence, physical or manual handling or guidance, act of managing by direction or regulation, or administration, as management of family, or of household, or of servants, or of great enterprises, or of great affairs.' 16. dealing .....

Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and anr. Vs. Sachala Majhi

Court : Orissa

Reported in : II(2005)ACC695; 2006ACJ1428; [2005(105)FLR47]; 2005(I)OLR137

..... code, 1979 as quoted in the judgment of the commissioner, workmen's compensation, the duty of a forest guard is to see that the provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 and rules framed thereunder are observed and to put a stop to illegal shooting and trapping. he is also required to patrol the forest to prevent offences ..... show that he comes under the definition of 'workmen' under the amended provision and therefore the petition filed claiming compensation was not maintainable.6. after amendment of the act, the word 'forestry' has been inserted as item no. xxix in schedule-ii and prescribes that whoever is employed in horticulture operation, forestry, bee keeping or farming ..... the claimant, on the other hand, submitted that as per the decision of this court the deceased has to be treated as a workman as defined under the act and he having died in course of employment, his wife is entitled to the claim. in respect of the appeal filed by the claimant, learned counsel appearing .....

Panchi Nath Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2006CriLJ361; RLW2006(2)Raj1357; 2005(4)WLC790

..... civil judge (jr. divn.) & judicial magistrate, kishanganj, district baran, whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced under section 9, schedule-ii 2/51 of the wild life protection act, 1972 to one year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of rs. 300/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo for one month rigorous imprisonment. ..... sufficient and delay ought to have been condoned, but the learned appellate court committed an illegality in dismissing the application under section 5 of the limitation act as well as appeal itself being barred by period of limitation.4. learned public prosecutor opposes the revision petition.5. i have considered the rival ..... petition and set aside the impugned judgment dated 30-6-2005 passed by the district & sessions judge, baran. the application under section 5 of the limitation act filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the district & sessions judge, baran is allowed. the matter is remanded back to .....

Dr. Satish JaIn Etc. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1172

..... officers of the orissa state forest department) alleging that they had falsely implicated him for offences under the orissa forest act, 1972 and the wild life (protection) act, 1972. he further alleged that being not content with the said illegal acts, they seriously assaulted him thereby committing offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 325, 506 and 386 read with ..... a large quantity of ivory was seized from the complainant and he could not produce any material to justify the possession thereof. according to them, the acts of search, seizure and arrest were done in pursuance of their official duty and they could not be proceeded against without necessary sanction as contemplated under section ..... and misappropriation of the amount as indicated above. as such no offence is made out under section 406 i. p. c.12. wrongful or illegal act of cheating may give again rise to a criminal action when it is clear from the complaint or shown statements that essential ingredients are made out. from .....

Union of IndiA. Vs. Hassan Ali Khan, and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 4 deals with offences under the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956, and paragraph 5 deals with offences under the prevention of corruption act, 1988. the learned asg submitted that the facts of ..... amp; psychotropic substances act, 1985. the learned asg submitted that, on the other hand, para b is divided into five paragraphs. paragraph 1 deals with offences under the indian penal code, while paragraph 2 deals with offences under the arms act, 1959. paragraph 3 deals with offences under the wild life (protection) act, 1972, paragraph ..... with which the respondent no.1 had been dealing, attracted the attention of the revenue department and on investigation conducted under the foreign exchange management act, 1959, (fema), show cause notices were issued to the respondent no.1 for alleged violation of sections 3a and 4 thereof for acquiring and .....

A.S.Dhanapal Vs. the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative

Court : Chennai

..... 1977 s.c. 536 = (1977) 90 l.w. 102 s.n.)), section 20(1) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 (vide a.k.roy .. vs.. state of punjab (a.i.r. 1986 s.c. 2160)) and section 55 of the wild life protection act, 1972 (vide state of bihar .. vs .. murad ali khan (a.i.r. 1989 sc 1) as mandatory. recently, ..... while analysing the negative language employed to the proviso to section 33(2)(b) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, the hon'ble supreme court has held that it is ..... therein was allowed to retire on 30.6.1993 on attaining the age of superannuation. after his retirement, based on the inspection, surcharge notice under section 87 of the act was issued. though, reply was submitted to the said notice, authority confirmed the demand and the appeal filed by the petitioner therein before the special tribunal was also dismissed. .....

State of Orissa and Others Vs. Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC1868; JT1995(3)SC662; 1995(2)SCALE900; 1995Supp(2)SCC686; [1995]3SCR639

..... air (1961) sc 549, concluded the matter and the state legislature was denuded of its powers to enact any law on the subject. it is thereafter, orissa cess act, (act 2 of 1962), as amended, was enacted, and it came up for consideration before this court in orissa cement ltd. v. state of orissa : [1991]2scr105 . ..... irrespective of the lease area.4. during the course of arguments, it was fairly agreed by all parties that if the orissa rural employment, education and production act, 1992 (orissa act 36 of 1992) as amended, is without legislative competence, it is unnecessary to adjudicate upon the other points raised before the high court and reiterated before us ..... mahanadi coalfields ltd., a government company, in whom the lands in question vests in accordance with section 11 of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957 (central act 20 of 1957), and union of india are the respondents in the main appeal. in the other appeals, the consumers of coal who purchase coal from .....

Centre for Environment Law, Wwf-i Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... various conventions including convention on biological diversity (cbd) and also for proper implementation of iucn, cites etc., and the provisions of the wild life (protection) act, bio-diversity act, forest conservation act etc. in the light of articles 48a and 51a(g), the government of india has laid down various policies and action plans ..... sansar chand v. state of rajasthan, (2010) 10 scc 604 held that all efforts must be made to implement the spirit and provisions of the wild life (protection) act, 1972; the provisions of which are salutary and are necessary to be implemented to maintain ecological chain and balance. the stockholm declaration, the declaration of ..... that no reliable information was furnished to support the view regarding adequacy of prey base at kuno. shri divan also referred to section 12 of the wild life (protection) act and submitted that the translocation should be to an alternative suitable habitat. kuno, according to the learned senior counsel, is not a suitable .....

Wild Life Protection Society, Hyderabad Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD346; 2002(2)ALT555

..... india, we are of the opinion that the 1st respondent-state of andhra pradesh has taken all precautionary measures to protect wild life animals and for enforcement of the provisions of the wild life protection act, 1972 under the scheme of development of national parks and sanctuaries, project tiger, project elephant. the government of india ..... financial constraints and that the central government has also provided financial assistance to the state government for effective enforcement of the provisions of the wild life protection act, 1972 under the scheme of development of national parks and sanctuaries project tiger, project elephant and that the amount released so far under ..... writ of mandamus to the respondents: (a) to effectively enforce the provisions of the wild life protection act of 1972 by providing additional measures and precautions to prevent such gory incidents in future in all the places of wild life habitat; (b) to direct the respondents to conduct a judicial enquiry into the .....