Court : Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Jaipur
..... . can such an individual contributing to the cghs be said to be a "consumer" of medical facilities available in a government hospital, within the meaning of the consumer protection act? does the payment by way of a regular monthly contribution constitute "consideration"? the fact that the cghs contribution does not cover the full cost of the hospital facilities provided ..... s.k.m. lodha, president: (1) these are five connected appeals under sec. 15 of the consumer protection act, 1986 (for short "the act") arising out of a common order dated 17.10.89 passed in different five complaints. they were heard together and we consider it proper to dispose them ..... of rajasthan and others (first appeal no. 2 of 1989, decided on december 15,1989), as under: - "..in enacting the statute the intention of parliament was to provide protection and relief to your categories of consumers namely; (i) persons who have suffered loss or damage as a result of any unfair trade practice adopted by any trader; (ii) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Jaipur
..... lodha, president: (1) shankar birmiwal has filed this complaint against the opposite-parties on 16.10.89 under sec. 12 read with sec. 17 of the consumer protection act. 1986 ("the act" herein) for various reliefs. the complainant who is a practising lawyer gave a bid on 29.7.87 in the auction of a plot which was held by ..... the contract in the civil court." (4) in view of this finding the writ petition was dismissed with no order as to costs. (5) in consumer unity and protection centre v. nadiad muncipality and others (original petition no. 7/88 decided on may 10, 1989 by the national commission) the complaint was permitted to be withdrawn on ..... complainant was unsuccessful before the jda, tribunal and in the high court still he can pursue his remedy by filing the complaint before the authority established under the act. we have bestowed our most anxious and thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the complainant. it may be recalled that jda, tribunal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Jaipur
..... determining whether he would like to accept the risk. in this judgement, regulation 2(1)(d) of the insurance regulatory and development authority (protection of policy holders interest) regulation, 2002 has been referred which defines the word material to mean and include all important, essential and relevant information in the context of ..... have been cured fully. we have also called for the instructions of the insurance corporation wherein the minimum waiting period has been prescribed for various diseases during which life policies are not issued. for stone in kidney, the minimum waiting period is 12 months after cure or six months after operation. when the policies were obtained ..... new india assurance co. ltd. 2009 (iv) cpj 8, hon'ble the supreme court has held that the term material fact is not defined in the act and therefore it has been understood in general terms to mean as any fact which would influence the judgement of a prudent insurer in fixing the premium or .....
Tag this Judgment!