Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 38c functions of the authority Court: mumbai Page 11 of about 176 results (0.056 seconds)

Mar 31 2009 (TRI)

Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited, Mumbai and Another Vs. Shri Mu ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

..... actually it was not so as mentioned in sec.2(1)(oo) of consumer protection act, 1986. therefore, the forum below rightly allowed the complaint and passed an award in favour of the complainant. we are finding no substance in the appeal preferred by the pepsico ..... rightly took cognizance of the complaint and held that it was defective drink offered for sale to the general public as mentioned in sec.2(1)(f) of consumer protection act, 1986. it was certainly a spurious goods claimed to be genuine but ..... goods which was hazardous to life and safety and which was being offered for sale to the general public in contravention of the standards relating to the safety of such goods under any law for the time being in force. so, there was contravention of clause 5 and 6 of sec.2(1)(c) of consumer protection act and therefore the forum below .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2016 (HC)

Dr. Mahesh Vijay Bedekar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... deserves to be noted here. the noise pollution rules have been framed in exercise of powers under sections 5 and 25 of the environment protection act. section 15 of the environment protection act contains provisions regarding the penalty. under sub-section (1) of section 15, it is provided that a person who fails to comply with ..... authorities while planning development activity such as preparation of development plan shall take into consideration all aspects of noise pollution as a parameter of quality of life to avoid noise menace and to achieve the objective of maintaining the standards in respect of noise. needless to add that while sanctioning a development plan ..... the draft development plans, the municipal corporations are under an obligation to take into consideration all aspects of noise pollution as a parameter of quality of life to avoid noise menace and to achieve the objective of maintaining the ambient air quality standards in respect of noise. we are dealing with the submission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2016 (HC)

Adarsh Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. A Society registered under Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

..... state governments and union territory administrations shall ensure adherence to these regulations and violations, if any, shall be subject to the provisions of the environment (protection) act, 1986. 141. paragraph 4 thereof deals with the procedure for monitoring and enforcement and reads thus, 4. procedure for monitoring and enforcement: the ..... / marine parks, sanctuaries, reserve forests, wildlife habitats, mangroves, corals / coral reefs, areas close to breeding and spawning grounds of fish and other marine life, areas of outstanding natural beauty / historical / heritage areas, areas rich in genetic-diversity, areas likely to be inundated due to rise in sea level ..... parks, sanctuaries, reserve forests, wildlife habitats, mangroves, corals / coral reefs, areas close to breeding and spawning grounds of fish and other marine life, areas of outstanding natural beauty/historical/heritage areas, areas rich in genetic-diversity, areas likely to be inundated due to rise in sea level consequent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2015 (HC)

Dimple Jatin Khanna @ Dimple Rajesh Khanna @ Dimple Khanna and Others ...

Court : Mumbai

..... , 9th court, bandra, mumbai, bearing c.c. no. 25/dv/2012 filed by respondent no.1 under section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') 3. petitioner no.1 mrs. dimple jatin khanna @ dimple rajesh khanna and petitioner no.2 mrs. twinkle rajiv bhatia in writ ..... harm caused by the respondents and to compensate for loss caused due to forcible and illegal eviction from the residence and the resultant mental agony, anguish, danger to life, health and impairment of the health, injury and damages suffered by the complainant; (ii) directing the respondents to pay to the complainant an amount of rs.50 ..... name of the appellant. no evidence is forthcoming, in this case, to show that the respondent had caused any harm or injuries or endangered the health, safely, life, limb or wellbeing, or caused any physical or sexual abuse on the appellant, except that he did not maintain her or continued with the relationship. alienation of affection .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2015 (HC)

Pushpalata Sohanlal Sharma Vs. Smt. Brij Madanlal Sharma and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... goes no further to prove any title of brij and madanlal. 99. the court is not required to see the case of unlawfully occupied possession. the court cannot protect possession unlawfully occupied. any length of such possession cannot advance its quality. even to acquire title by prescription, the possession must be shown to be enjoyed for the ..... accordingly in two separate cases areva t and d india ltd. vs. mr. r govindrajan and ors., 2010(3) all mr 140 and h r irani vs. life insurance corporation of india and anr., 2010 (2) all m r, the onus of a noticee under sections 4 and 5 of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants ..... accommodation, brij's father uttamchand sharma offered to finance separate accommodation for brij and himself in the year 1970. they had negotiations with garware through advocate v. a. phadke acting as common solicitor for both parties. garware demanded rs.99,000/- for the suit premises. mr. phadke was to reduce and settle the purchase price. mr. phadke .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2016 (HC)

Prakash Gobindram Ahuja Vs. Ganesh Pandharinath Dhonde and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... learned single judge has, then, in para no.30 of its judgment, proceeded to sum up the legal position as follows:- (a) section 52 of the tp act provides adequate protection to the parties from transfers pendente lite and such transferees are neither required to be impleaded nor can claim impleadment. they cannot even resist execution proceedings. (b) ..... pendent lite cannot claim impleadment, cannot be read as a binding precedent. 32. the learned single judge then proceeded to decide whether section 52 of the tp act provides adequate protection to the parties from transfer pendent lite and was pleased to hold that the first part of clause (a) of paragraph no.30 in kachhi properties decision ..... at the cost of repetition, it has to be pointed out that the hon'ble judge deciding pralhad's case also agreed that section 52 of the tp act could provide protection to the plaintiff. the observation of the hon'ble judge that the transfer pendente lite is not held to be illegal or void is correct, but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2016 (HC)

Sarika Mahendra Sureka Vs. Mahendra and Another

Court : Mumbai

..... profounder principle of women's right as concomitant of human rights . (emphasis supplied) 67. thus, when the very object of enactment of d.v. act is to protect the right of married woman in the shared household irrespective of to whom such house belongs and when the very concept of her right of residence being linked ..... from the shared household or any part of it by the respondent save in accordance with the procedure established by law . 45. section 18 of the act deals with protection orders which the magistrate may, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person, and the respondent, pass from time to time. in favour of ..... failed to consider these aspects and especially the appellant s right of residence in her matrimonial home, which is recognized under the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as, d.v. act ). as a result, the impugned order of the trial court has resulted into miscarriage and failure of justice to the appellant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2016 (HC)

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Through the Municipal Commiss ...

Court : Mumbai

..... dated 4 november 2013, the moef disposed off the show cause notice dated 25 july 2013 by issuing several directions under section 5 of the environmental (protection) act, 1986 (epa). the mcgm claims that all the directions contained in the order dated 4 november 2013, (except the impugned directions concerning demolition of compound ..... the aforesaid directions moef has passed a final order dated 4 november 2013. the moef has also given certain directions under section 5 of the environment (protection) act 1986 being directions (a) to (f) at paragraph 5 in its order dated 4 november 2013. it appears that after passing the final order ..... national parks/marine parks, sanctuaries, reserved forests, wildlife habitats, mangroves, corals/coral reefs, areas closed to breeding and spawning grounds of fish and other marine life, areas of outstanding natural beauty/historical/heritage areas, areas rich in genetic diversity, areas likely to be inundated due to rise in sea level consequent upon global .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2001 (HC)

M.V. sea Success I Vs. Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and I ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR537

..... -parties having printed clause making it mandatory for a vessel to have a valid protection and indemnity cover to buttress his argument that protection & indemnity club cover/marine insurance is necessary within the meaning of section 5 of the act of 1861. mr. rebello relied upon the judgment in caterpill finance v. alential ..... indemnify the members against certain liabilities which are not covered by ordinary form of policy, such as, liabilities for claims by members of the crew, for life salvage, for the loss or damage to goods carried on their ships, for wreck removal, for damage to piers, jetties etc., some associations also ..... far reaching as it caters to the eventualities in respect of the seamen liabilities, passenger liabilities and third party liabilities attending to the complement, stowaways, supernumeraries, life salvage and persons in distress and also liabilities arising as a result of collision, damage to the ships, damage to property, pollution, wreck removal, towage etc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2010 (HC)

Mrs.Sabah Sami Khan. Vs. Adnan Sami Khan.

Court : Mumbai

..... an effort at settlement even in cases relating to the shared residence or the matrimonial home of the parties for which protection or residence orders are claimed under sections 18 and 19 of the d.v. act if that is the subject-matter of the petition before the family court. various reliefs may be granted thereunder. this ..... or mental, to the aggrieved person.explanation i.- for the purposes of this section,-(i) physical abuse means any act or conduct which is of such a nature as to cause bodily pain, harm, or danger to life, limb, or health or impair the health or development of the aggrieved person and includes assault, criminal intimidation and ..... relevant part of section 3 of the d.v. act runs thus:-3. definition of domestic violence. for the purposes of this act, any act, omission or commission or conduct of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it-(a) harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or wellbeing, whether mental or physical, of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //